On 03.01.2012 21:42 meekerdb said the following:
On 1/3/2012 12:24 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 02.01.2012 21:32 meekerdb said the following:
On 1/2/2012 12:24 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 02.01.2012 07:01 meekerdb said the following:
...
Everett's MWI is based on QM which does assume a
On 1/4/2012 10:55 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 03.01.2012 21:42 meekerdb said the following:
On 1/3/2012 12:24 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 02.01.2012 21:32 meekerdb said the following:
On 1/2/2012 12:24 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 02.01.2012 07:01 meekerdb said the following:
...
On 1/4/2012 3:03 PM, meekerdb wrote:
In the MW interpretation there is no collapse, but there is a split
into (almost) orthogonal worlds or each person splits into
orthogonal minds. These are just projections onto different
quasi-classical subspaces corresponding to different measurement
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 9:53 PM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.comwrote:
Sure, our belief in simulations can make them seem quite realistic to us.
That doesn't make them real though.
And so simulators join a long long long list of things that you say are not
real. If X contradicts your
On 1/4/2012 9:29 PM, John Clark wrote:
It's [the brain] nothing like a computer which drops the contents of RAM
as soon
as electricity is cut off
As anyone who has ever used a flash drive could tell you not all RAM acts that
way.
Anyone who's hit their head really hard can tell
5 matches
Mail list logo
