On 28 May 2013, at 19:23, meekerdb wrote:
On 5/28/2013 9:04 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 28 May 2013, at 01:53, meekerdb wrote:
On 5/27/2013 2:18 PM, John Mikes wrote:
Bruno:
do you indeed exclude the other animals from being
selfconcious? or - having a logic on their own level? Or any
On 29 May 2013, at 00:10, John Mikes wrote:
Evgenyi, you write very 'deep' and 'smart things.
One bothers me:
..the neurological substrates that generate consciousness.
first the anthropocentric sound (neurological?) and then the
unidentified term of Ccness.
In this same post (cf Russell
On 28 May 2013, at 19:27, Richard Ruquist wrote:
Bruno,
In my model which you have already said is not comp,
all the computational histories happen in a mindspace
and only one of them become physical.
Yes, that is what makes it into a non-comp theory, a bit like Bohm's
hidden variable
On 29 May 2013, at 06:59, Kim Jones wrote:
On 29/05/2013, at 2:04 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
You don't need language to feel the hotness of a fire.
Bruno
You don't need language to feel the effect of music.
Good point.
Language is the greatest barrier to
On 29 May 2013, at 08:33, meekerdb wrote:
On 5/28/2013 11:13 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 28 May 2013, at 19:23, meekerdb wrote:
On 5/28/2013 9:04 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 28 May 2013, at 01:53, meekerdb wrote:
On 5/27/2013 2:18 PM, John Mikes wrote:
Bruno:
do you indeed exclude the
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 2:37 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
If you want to communicate why should I need to search at all? And if
even Google doesn't know what the hell Bpp is then it's ridiculous to
expect your readers to know what you're talking about.
Come on, John. Search
Brent: after lots of back-and-forth you wrote:
*...I don't see the analogy. I don't think consciousness can be negative,
or even that it can be measured by one dimension. All-or-nothing would
be a function that is either 1 or 0. If you can be conscious of red and
green, then I'd say you are
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del%27s_incompleteness_theorems#Construction_of_a_statement_about_.22provability.22
2013/5/29 John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 2:37 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
If you want to communicate why should I need to search at
On 29 May 2013, at 17:47, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del%27s_incompleteness_theorems#Construction_of_a_statement_about_.22provability.22
2013/5/29 John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 2:37 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
If you
On 5/29/2013 12:38 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 29 May 2013, at 08:33, meekerdb wrote:
On 5/28/2013 11:13 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 28 May 2013, at 19:23, meekerdb wrote:
On 5/28/2013 9:04 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 28 May 2013, at 01:53, meekerdb wrote:
On 5/27/2013 2:18 PM, John
This is fun!
http://youtu.be/EJsD-3jtXz0?t=24m16s
It exist!
--
Onward!
Stephen
I apologize in advance for the gross errors that this post
and all of my posts will contain. ;-)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To
On 5/29/2013 9:52 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 29 May 2013, at 18:37, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 29 May 2013, at 17:47, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6del%27s_incompleteness_theorems#Construction_of_a_statement_about_.22provability.22
2013/5/29 John Clark
12 matches
Mail list logo
