Hi Prof. Standish
Thanks so much for the offer. I actually hunted the paper down from a link in
the original springer resource you posted. Some of it flies over my head, but
not all of it, so I'll persevere...
ISTM that you are implicitly assuming that these replicating
hypercycles only
On 8/8/2013 8:10 PM, chris peck wrote:
Hi Prof. Standish
Thanks so much for the offer. I actually hunted the paper down from a link in the
original springer resource you posted. Some of it flies over my head, but not all of it,
so I'll persevere...
ISTM that you are implicitly assuming that
Hi Brent
But random mutations *don't* result in catastrophe. Your body has hundreds
of cells with
copying errors in their DNA. Of course only those in gametes can get passed to
progeny.
But even gamete DNA can have copying errors without catastrophic results.
When youre talking about
It probably also depends a bit what you mean by Darwinian. If you mean
by that the central dogma is satisfied, then no - prebiotic evolution
probably did not satisfy the central dogma, so variants like
Larmarkianism may well be possible.
BTW, even anthropic selection from a large number of extant
4 matches
Mail list logo
