On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 3:30 AM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12 November 2013 14:04, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com wrote:
Every science whose conclusions have effects in politics has a high risk
of being manipulated. In the URSS and here. From Anthropology to long term
Hi Telmo
There maye have been a hint of sarcasm in my comment, to be honest. I don't
think we will better the scientific method, although we may be able to
improve how we implement it, as it were - the human part of the equation.
But I'm glad I stimulated your interesting comments, anyway!
--
2013/11/12 meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
On 11/11/2013 5:04 PM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
Every science whose conclusions have effects in politics has a high risk
of being manipulated. In the URSS and here. From Anthropology to long term
Meteorology to everything in the middle. The one that
2013/11/12 LizR lizj...@gmail.com
On 12 November 2013 14:04, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com wrote:
Every science whose conclusions have effects in politics has a high risk
of being manipulated. In the URSS and here. From Anthropology to long term
Meteorology to everything in the
On 12 Nov 2013, at 03:38, LizR wrote:
On 12 November 2013 14:14, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 11/11/2013 4:29 PM, LizR wrote:
On 12 November 2013 13:03, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 11/11/2013 3:39 PM, LizR wrote:
On 12 November 2013 09:37, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
On 12 Nov 2013, at 04:35, LizR wrote:
On 12 November 2013 16:03, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 11/11/2013 6:38 PM, LizR wrote:
Benjamin Button lived his life in reverse.
Oh, right, like the guy in Martin Amis' Time's Arrow (itself a
rip off from An Age by Brian Aldiss).
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 10:36 AM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Telmo
There maye have been a hint of sarcasm in my comment, to be honest.
I suspected as much, but wanted to babble anyway :)
I don't
think we will better the scientific method, although we may be able to
improve how we
So what would you suggest as a replacement? The scientific method is, to
paraphrase Winston Churchill on democracy, the worst system we have apart
from all the others we've tried.
Following your analogy. when the the media, and the politicians
of majority parties form a coalition to defend their
On 12 Nov 2013, at 04:44, meekerdb wrote:
Experience may be like that; everything has 'experience', it's just
not human experience and when you stop having human experience
you're dead.
Why? If by dying we remember being something different from human, I
would still feel like I am
On 12 Nov 2013, at 06:23, Chris de Morsella wrote:
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com [mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com
] On Behalf Of Bruno Marchal
Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 7:43 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Our Demon-Haunted World
On 11 Nov
To spudboy:
Reason alone does`n move to anything, not even to knowledge. If you think
that your passions are bad for looking for the truth, you are wrong. What
you must say is that some passions are an obstacle for other higher
passions, for example the passion of using the reason to reach the
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 7:14 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
Benjamin Button lived his life in reverse.
So I'll ask you the same thing I asked Quentin, what's you inference from
the fact you, and every body you've ever heard of died before reaching age
150?
That observation is
Also, I found this related thread on QTI, archived by James Higgo, which
took place on this list many years ago:
http://higgo.com/qti/rplaga.htm
Jason
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 7:14 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
2013/11/12 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
On 12 Nov 2013, at 11:54, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
So what would you suggest as a replacement? The scientific method is, to
paraphrase Winston Churchill on democracy, the worst system we have apart
from all the others we've tried.
Following your
I agree and understand, Alberto, with your elegy.
Mitch
-Original Message-
From: Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com
To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tue, Nov 12, 2013 6:42 am
Subject: Re: Our Demon-Haunted World
To spudboy:
Reason alone does`n move to
Climategate a Fox News generated tempest in a teacup. Much ado about stupid
human behavior in order to keep the focus off of the salient facts that
global mean temperatures have been rising (within the backdrop of natural
weather cycles, such as the El Nino oscillation); that global mean sea
On 11/12/2013 2:37 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Both with Comp and with Everett-QM we have lost that unique theoretical evidence,
because our best current explanation (comp, or QM) makes that mind-brain identity non
sensical.
I don't see anything about QM that makes mind is what a brain does
On 11/12/2013 2:50 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 12 Nov 2013, at 04:35, LizR wrote:
On 12 November 2013 16:03, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
mailto:meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 11/11/2013 6:38 PM, LizR wrote:
Benjamin Button lived his life in reverse.
Oh, right, like the
On 11/12/2013 2:55 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 12 Nov 2013, at 04:44, meekerdb wrote:
Experience may be like that; everything has 'experience', it's just not human
experience and when you stop having human experience you're dead.
Why? If by dying we remember being something different
On 11/12/2013 4:14 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 12 Nov 2013, at 11:54, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
So what would you suggest as a replacement? The scientific method is, to paraphrase
Winston Churchill on democracy, the worst system we have apart from all the others
we've tried.
Following
On 11/12/2013 7:19 AM, Jason Resch wrote:
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 7:14 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
mailto:meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
Benjamin Button lived his life in reverse.
So I'll ask you the same thing I asked Quentin, what's you inference from
the fact
you, and
On 11/12/2013 10:24 AM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2013/11/12 meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net mailto:meeke...@verizon.net
On 11/12/2013 7:19 AM, Jason Resch wrote:
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 7:14 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
mailto:meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
Benjamin
2013/11/12 meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
On 11/12/2013 10:24 AM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2013/11/12 meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
On 11/12/2013 7:19 AM, Jason Resch wrote:
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 7:14 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
Benjamin Button lived his life in
On 11/12/2013 11:15 AM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2013/11/12 meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net mailto:meeke...@verizon.net
On 11/12/2013 10:24 AM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2013/11/12 meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net mailto:meeke...@verizon.net
On 11/12/2013 7:19 AM, Jason Resch
2013/11/12 meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
On 11/12/2013 11:15 AM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2013/11/12 meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
On 11/12/2013 10:24 AM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2013/11/12 meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
On 11/12/2013 7:19 AM, Jason Resch wrote:
On Mon, Nov 11,
You said it: the calentological comunity, acting as a single entity, denied
their data. to scientists with different points of view. That is not
science. that is a sectarian organization that, because are working with
public funding are breaking not only the law and the decency, but the last
bit
On 11/12/2013 11:30 AM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2013/11/12 meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net mailto:meeke...@verizon.net
On 11/12/2013 11:15 AM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2013/11/12 meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net mailto:meeke...@verizon.net
On 11/12/2013 10:24 AM, Quentin Anciaux
On 11/12/2013 11:53 AM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
You said it: the calentological comunity, acting as a single entity, denied their data.
to scientists with different points of view.
But they didn't. They only discussed it and noted that some of the data didn't belong to
them but had been
Thus said, because there are eternal laws, there are eternal truths. For
the materialists, Konrad Lorenz said something extraordinarily profound
that connect two universes of knowledge: The Kantian apriori of knowledge
have been inserted in our brain/mind/soul by evolution in the form of
2013/11/12 meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
On 11/12/2013 11:30 AM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2013/11/12 meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
On 11/12/2013 11:15 AM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2013/11/12 meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
On 11/12/2013 10:24 AM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2013/11/12
So you say that because the data was finally available against their will,
they are good scientists that welcome the challenges and the scientific
method? : Their practices tell absolutely the contrary. And the fact that
their data leaked out is not in their merit, in the contrary. All what you
On 11/12/2013 12:23 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
This is ASSA, and I find that absurd, there is no absolute probability of being alive,
probability is only meaningful between two moments...
But there's a probability of being alive at time t in the future, and that can become
arbitrarily small,
2013/11/12 meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
On 11/12/2013 12:23 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
This is ASSA, and I find that absurd, there is no absolute probability of
being alive, probability is only meaningful between two moments...
But there's a probability of being alive at time t in the
On 11/12/2013 12:30 PM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
So you say that because the data was finally available against their will, they are good
scientists that welcome the challenges and the scientific method?
They were not compelled, they agreed to provide the data after discussing whether there
2013/11/12 meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
On 11/12/2013 12:23 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
This is ASSA, and I find that absurd, there is no absolute probability of
being alive, probability is only meaningful between two moments...
But there's a probability of being alive at time t in the
On 13 November 2013 05:19, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com wrote:
And the fact is that there are plenty of energy and materials everywhere.
The only lacking resource is the inteligence and ingenuity of more people
to learn to use them.
That at least you have got right.
--
You
On 11/12/2013 12:45 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2013/11/12 meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net mailto:meeke...@verizon.net
On 11/12/2013 12:23 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
This is ASSA, and I find that absurd, there is no absolute probability of
being
alive, probability is only
On 13 November 2013 06:40, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
I knew you didn't live on this planet or care for it's future.
Quite clearly - I have my own dirt to attend to ignores the existence of
the commons we all share in. If Alberto wants to move to Mars then fine, he
is no longer
2013/11/12 meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
On 11/12/2013 12:45 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2013/11/12 meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
On 11/12/2013 12:23 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
This is ASSA, and I find that absurd, there is no absolute probability of
being alive, probability is only
As human beings they were reluctant to provide hard earned data to those
who had proved to mere critics - like you - with no interest but to spread
doubt.
Can ever have been a more clear confession of sectarianism ? Doubt about
what? about what yours affirm that is truth and must be taken as
On 11/12/2013 1:02 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2013/11/12 meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net mailto:meeke...@verizon.net
On 11/12/2013 12:45 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2013/11/12 meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net mailto:meeke...@verizon.net
On 11/12/2013 12:23 PM, Quentin Anciaux
Brent, try cruising Wikipedia. I don't know of any biologist or physician, that
didn't approve of this nonsense. I am not aware of anyone speaking out
authoritatively, as a scientist that opposed eugenics. Maybe you can, but I
don't recall anyone on the hero side. Whether is was pro-birth
2013/11/12 meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
On 11/12/2013 1:02 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2013/11/12 meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
On 11/12/2013 12:45 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2013/11/12 meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
On 11/12/2013 12:23 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
This is ASSA,
On 11/12/2013 1:36 PM, spudboy...@aol.com wrote:
Brent, try cruising Wikipedia. I don't know of any biologist or physician, that didn't
approve of this nonsense. I am not aware of anyone speaking out authoritatively, as a
scientist that opposed eugenics. Maybe you can, but I don't recall anyone
Indeed. I look at things a bit different, perhaps. then yourself. I see it, us,
as being set against obliteration versus existence.
Mitch
-Original Message-
From: Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com
To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tue, Nov 12, 2013 3:12
On 11/12/2013 1:37 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2013/11/12 meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net mailto:meeke...@verizon.net
On 11/12/2013 1:02 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2013/11/12 meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net mailto:meeke...@verizon.net
On 11/12/2013 12:45 PM, Quentin Anciaux
Probably both, if my reading of history books about this time. Which I am using
as a reminder that we need to be cautious about how to react to this, AGW might
be completely true, but I am worried that world socialists, and a cadre of
billionaire supporters want this for other reasons then to
How the people of Iceland solved their debt crisis:
They said, wait a minute. We didn't cause this problem.
The govt and the bankers caused ity.
So they threw the bankers and other causers of the debt into jail.
Hmmm. Sounds tempting.
- Roger Clough
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_-BJgwWx57U#
2013/11/12 meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
On 11/12/2013 1:37 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2013/11/12 meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
On 11/12/2013 1:02 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2013/11/12 meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
On 11/12/2013 12:45 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2013/11/12
Good move. But they are still in debt
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
How the people of Iceland solved their debt crisis:
They said, wait a minute. We didn't cause this problem.
The govt and the bankers caused ity.
So they threw the bankers and
Every one of the perhaps inifinite copies of you will grow old and die in
less than 150 years.
There is no quantum immortality
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/11/12 meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
On 11/12/2013 1:37 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
Liz wrote: (and I try to interject my remarks in plain lettering)
*Sequence is determinative because that's how the universe works. *
I would say: how WE explain the workings of the universe (- rather
Multiverse).
* Tomorrow, and tomorrow, and tomorrow, creeps in this petty pace from day
to day,
On 11/12/2013 1:57 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
So *you* Quentin Anciaux (incidentally, how do pronounce that?) don't
necessarily
continue. It is just that there is a continuation of 1p POVs. So we're
down to the
question of what constitutes a 1p POV.
I know what is my own,
2013/11/12 meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
On 11/12/2013 1:57 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
So *you* Quentin Anciaux (incidentally, how do pronounce that?) don't
necessarily continue. It is just that there is a continuation of 1p POVs.
So we're down to the question of what constitutes a 1p
2013/11/13 Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com
2013/11/12 meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
On 11/12/2013 1:57 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
So *you* Quentin Anciaux (incidentally, how do pronounce that?) don't
necessarily continue. It is just that there is a continuation of 1p POVs.
So
2013/11/12 Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com
Every one of the perhaps inifinite copies of you will grow old and die in
less than 150 years.
There is no quantum immortality
Well it's cool asserting things... but you should develop more, all I'm
saying is that if MWI is true, the argument
On 13 November 2013 10:55, spudboy...@aol.com wrote:
if you want us to give up the bad, dirty, power, then please provide a
clean, affordable, abundant substitute. Faster, please.
The Sun, of course. Produces millions of times more power than we need.
Trouble is the fossil fuel industry
Sounds like a good start. Throw them in jail and confiscate their assets.
Free the 32 trillion!
On 13 November 2013 11:04, Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com wrote:
Good move. But they are still in debt
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 4:55 PM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
How the
On 13 November 2013 10:30, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
But that's part of what bothers me about this idea. How
crippled/brain-damaged can you be and still count as a continuation? Are
there degrees of continuation? If so, why can't the degrees asymptote to
zero?
That bothers me
On 13 November 2013 11:12, Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com wrote:
Every one of the perhaps inifinite copies of you will grow old and die in
less than 150 years.
There is no quantum immortality
A pretty bold statement. I don't see that the laws of physics require this
- there must be a
Le 12 nov. 2013 22:53, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net a écrit :
On 11/12/2013 1:37 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2013/11/12 meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
On 11/12/2013 1:02 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
2013/11/12 meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
On 11/12/2013 12:45 PM, Quentin Anciaux
On 13 November 2013 11:16, John Mikes jami...@gmail.com wrote:
Liz wrote: (and I try to interject my remarks in plain lettering)
*Sequence is determinative because that's how the universe works. *
I would say: how WE explain the workings of the universe (- rather
Multiverse).
Yes of
On 13 November 2013 11:22, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 11/12/2013 1:57 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
So *you* Quentin Anciaux (incidentally, how do pronounce that?) don't
necessarily continue. It is just that there is a continuation of 1p POVs.
So we're down to the question of
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 11:15 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 11/12/2013 2:37 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Both with Comp and with Everett-QM we have lost that unique theoretical
evidence, because our best current explanation (comp, or QM) makes that
mind-brain identity non
On 11/12/2013 3:49 PM, LizR wrote:
On 13 November 2013 10:55, spudboy...@aol.com mailto:spudboy...@aol.com
wrote:
if you want us to give up the bad, dirty, power, then please provide a
clean,
affordable, abundant substitute. Faster, please.
The Sun, of course. Produces millions of
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 11:45 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 11/12/2013 2:55 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 12 Nov 2013, at 04:44, meekerdb wrote:
Experience may be like that; everything has 'experience', it's just not
human experience and when you stop having human experience
2013/11/13 LizR lizj...@gmail.com
On 13 November 2013 10:55, spudboy...@aol.com wrote:
if you want us to give up the bad, dirty, power, then please provide a
clean, affordable, abundant substitute. Faster, please.
The Sun, of course. Produces millions of times more power than we need.
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com wrote:
Every one of the perhaps inifinite copies of you will grow old and die in
less than 150 years.
There is no quantum immortality
I guess that settles it.
Jason
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
On 11/12/2013 4:13 PM, LizR wrote:
On 13 November 2013 11:22, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net mailto:meeke...@verizon.net
wrote:
On 11/12/2013 1:57 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
So *you* Quentin Anciaux (incidentally, how do pronounce that?) don't
necessarily continue. It is
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 5:57 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13 November 2013 11:12, Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com wrote:
Every one of the perhaps inifinite copies of you will grow old and die in
less than 150 years.
There is no quantum immortality
A pretty bold statement. I
On 11/12/2013 4:59 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 11:45 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
mailto:meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 11/12/2013 2:55 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 12 Nov 2013, at 04:44, meekerdb wrote:
Experience may be like that;
On 11/12/2013 5:14 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 5:57 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com
mailto:lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13 November 2013 11:12, Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com
mailto:yann...@gmail.com wrote:
Every one of the perhaps inifinite copies of you will
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 7:18 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 11/12/2013 4:59 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 11:45 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 11/12/2013 2:55 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 12 Nov 2013, at 04:44, meekerdb wrote:
Experience
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 7:20 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 11/12/2013 5:14 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 5:57 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 13 November 2013 11:12, Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com wrote:
Every one of the perhaps inifinite copies of
On 11/12/2013 5:27 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
There is a continuation from being anesthetized to waking up from anesthesia.
Did you leave out a no? There is a continuation, but not of consciousness.
Would you say the same true for an amnesiac being anesthetized?
I think so. An amnesiac is
On 13 November 2013 14:09, Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.comwrote:
Every one of the perhaps inifinite copies of you will grow old and die in
less than 150 years.
There is no quantum immortality
I guess that settles
Simple. Shooting yourself with a gun or whatever means you use to end your
life in one universe does not guarranttee that you do not grow in all other
universes. Unless the laws of physics differ across the multiverse, which I
understand to be incorrect, your copies will grow old and die in every
On 12 November 2013 22:56, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com wrote:
This is laughable. Not a SINGLE article against human warming was
publised in the main scientific magazines and you said that the process was
perverted by the deniers? I have no option but to think that you believe
en
On 13 November 2013 16:19, Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com wrote:
Simple. Shooting yourself with a gun or whatever means you use to end your
life in one universe does not guarranttee that you do not grow in all other
universes. Unless the laws of physics differ across the multiverse, which I
As I see it, the problem is connecting atmospheric disaster events to
global warming.
I have been looking for such a connection in the scientific literature and
even in AGW blogs w/o success.
Before going into physics I was an undergraduate student of mechanical
engineering.
In our fluid dynamic
My email service does not allow me to interleave comments.
Regarding your reply, the laws of biophysics does MANDATE growing old and
dying.
I think the more advanced understanding of the multiverse is that
incredibly unlikely things do not happen.
As I recall the argument was based on
On 11/12/2013 7:28 PM, LizR wrote:
On 13 November 2013 16:19, Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com
mailto:yann...@gmail.com wrote:
Simple. Shooting yourself with a gun or whatever means you use to end your
life in
one universe does not guarranttee that you do not grow in all other
On 13 November 2013 16:51, Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com wrote:
My email service does not allow me to interleave comments.
Well in that case maybe you could cut and paste the relevant quote. There
was an awful lot of text after your comment, I still have no idea what you
were replying to.
On 13 November 2013 17:03, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 11/12/2013 7:28 PM, LizR wrote:
On 13 November 2013 16:19, Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com wrote:
Simple. Shooting yourself with a gun or whatever means you use to end
your life in one universe does not guarranttee that
On 11/12/2013 8:08 PM, LizR wrote:
On 13 November 2013 17:03, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net mailto:meeke...@verizon.net
wrote:
On 11/12/2013 7:28 PM, LizR wrote:
On 13 November 2013 16:19, Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com
mailto:yann...@gmail.com wrote:
Simple. Shooting
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 8:12 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 11/12/2013 5:27 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
There is a continuation from being anesthetized to waking up from
anesthesia.
Did you leave out a no?
It was intentional, I meant there is a continuation, as in subjectively
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 9:19 PM, Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com wrote:
Simple. Shooting yourself with a gun or whatever means you use to end your
life in one universe does not guarranttee that you do not grow in all other
universes. Unless the laws of physics differ across the multiverse,
On 11/12/2013 9:38 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 8:12 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
mailto:meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 11/12/2013 5:27 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
There is a continuation from being anesthetized to waking up from
anesthesia.
Did you
On 13 November 2013 17:20, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 11/12/2013 8:08 PM, LizR wrote:
On 13 November 2013 17:03, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 11/12/2013 7:28 PM, LizR wrote:
On 13 November 2013 16:19, Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com wrote:
Simple. Shooting
89 matches
Mail list logo
