What is Science?

What it says in the tin... not a trick question. Cheers, Telmo. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

Re: Does GR tell us why anything moves?

On 3/7/2018 5:39 AM, agrayson2...@gmail.com wrote: *Thanks for your time and effort, but I don't think you understand my* *question. Suppose a test particle is restrained spatially, say in * *the Sun's gravitational field. When released, it starts to move (toward * *the Sun). How does GR

Re: Death creeps through the brain as a “spreading wave” of silence and inactivity

> On 3 Mar 2018, at 00:16, Brent Meeker wrote: > > > > On 3/2/2018 2:36 PM, Dirk Van Niekerk wrote: >> It looks as if individual neurons keep firing and small local (< 4mm) neural >> networks remain intact during general anesthesia (at least due to propofol). >>

Re: Does GR tell us why anything moves?

On Wednesday, March 7, 2018 at 2:17:15 AM UTC-5, Russell Standish wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 09:18:46PM -0800, agrays...@gmail.com > wrote: > > > > > > They follow from the principle of conservation of momentum, also > > > sometimes known as Newton's first law. > > > > > > > Can

Re: INDEXICAL Computationalism

On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 1:27 AM, Brent Meeker wrote: > > > On 3/5/2018 11:49 PM, Telmo Menezes wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 1:37 AM, Brent Meeker wrote: > > On 3/5/2018 9:14 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote: > > "Could" implies a question about

Re: Disclosure Project

Speaking for myself (and I'm guessing others) - I could care less. I care enough to respond to this, but only because I find this style of participation to be annoying as fuck. Nobody is going to take your bait. I'm guessing you know that, so this amounts to a bluff. Put up or shut up. > *But,

Re: Disclosure Project

On Wednesday, March 7, 2018 at 8:33:39 AM UTC-5, Terren Suydam wrote: > > Speaking for myself (and I'm guessing others) - I could care less. I care > enough to respond to this, but only because I find this style of > participation to be annoying as fuck. Nobody is going to take your bait. >

Re: Disclosure Project

If you're not bluffing, then what is holding you back from just holding forth on your "very good model"? Just put it out there and let people respond. That's how this thing works. You don't need an invitation. I doubt it's all that relevant to this list, but that hasn't stopped people before...

Re: Disclosure Project

On Wednesday, March 7, 2018 at 8:49:11 AM UTC-5, agrays...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, March 7, 2018 at 8:33:39 AM UTC-5, Terren Suydam wrote: >> >> Speaking for myself (and I'm guessing others) - I could care less. I care >> enough to respond to this, but only because I find this

Re: Disclosure Project

On Wednesday, March 7, 2018 at 9:33:25 AM UTC-5, Terren Suydam wrote: > > If you're not bluffing, then what is holding you back from just holding > forth on your "very good model"? Just put it out there and let people > respond. That's how this thing works. You don't need an invitation. I