[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> You all seem to assign to "measure" a soul-like quality as if measure had any
> value, as if it is "good" to maximize measure, as if measure has an
> objective, and absolute existence.. like the Ether.
>
> I believe that in fact, the probability of observing an eve
>
> On 18 xxx -1, Marchal wrote:
> > Jacques M. Mallah wrote:
> > >> Russell Standish wrote:
> > >> I still don't see what measure has to do with conciousness!
> > > That is the problem.
> > I don't see that either.
> > The measure is defined on the set of computations and gives the
> > relati
On 18 xxx -1, Marchal wrote:
> Jacques M. Mallah wrote:
> >> Russell Standish wrote:
> >> I still don't see what measure has to do with conciousness!
> > That is the problem.
> I don't see that either.
> The measure is defined on the set of computations and gives the
> relative probability of
On Mon, 16 Aug 1999, Russell Standish wrote:
[Jack wrote]
> > What I am trying to do is to look at the consequences of the
> > claims made by the quantum suicide camp. The claim is that consciousness
> > 'flows into' possible continuations of oneself and is, in effect,
> > conserved as long a
4 matches
Mail list logo
