On Tuesday, September 3, 2002, at 02:21 PM, scerir wrote:
> Tim May:
> I don't have a comprehensive theory of time,
> but I am very fond of "causal time."
>
> Sometimes we read papers saying there is now
> experimental evidence that quantum phenomena
> are "a-causal" or
Tim May:
I don't have a comprehensive theory of time,
but I am very fond of "causal time."
Sometimes we read papers saying there is now
experimental evidence that quantum phenomena
are "a-causal" or "non-causal" or "out-of-time".
See, in example, these recent papers
h
I'll say a few words on my personal journey in math.
On Tuesday, September 3, 2002, at 08:46 AM, Osher Doctorow wrote:
> One confusing point, I think, is the tendency of many mathematical
> logicians
> to identify with algebra and in fact to claim that their field is a
> branch
> or outgrowt
From: Osher Doctorow [EMAIL PROTECTED], Tues. Sept. 3, 2002 8:26AM
It also depends on the logic that one chooses (e.g., Lukaciewicz/Rational
Pavelka and Product/Goguen and Godel fuzzy multivalued logics - see P. Hajek
Metamathematics of Fuzzy Logics, Kluwer: Dordrecht 1998 for an excellent
exposi
"Stephen Paul King" wrote:
>
> > >I only have the vaguest hand waving reasoning at this time but let me
>> >try to make my case as to why I asked that question. If we identify
>MATTER
>> >with the notion of a "physical system" simulatable by Comp, following
>along
>> >the line that D. Deutsch
Title: Re: Rucker's Infinity and the
Mind
George Levy wrote in part:
Beautiful post, Hal. I have read and
reread Rudy Rucker's "Infinity and the Mind" four or five
times. This is such a rich book that I enjoy it everytime. His
explanation of the infinite always leaves me in awe.
I share the j
At 23:07 -0700 2/09/2002, Tim May wrote:
>You say you prefer continuity and connectednessthis all depends
>on the topology one chooses. In the microcircuit case, the natural
>topology of circuit elements and conductors and clock ticks gives us
>our lattice points. In other examples, set co
7 matches
Mail list logo
