Re: Tegmark's TOE & Cantor's Absolute Infinity

2002-09-23 Thread Tim May
On Monday, September 23, 2002, at 11:34 AM, Hal Finney wrote: > I have gone back to Tegmark's paper, which is discussed informally > at http://www.hep.upenn.edu/~max/toe.html and linked from > http://arXiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9704009. > > I see that Russell is right, and that Tegmark does identify >

Enormous Body of *Evidence* For Analysis-Based TOES

2002-09-23 Thread Osher Doctorow
From: Osher Doctorow [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mon. Sept. 23, 2002 12:32PM I refer readers to http://www.superstringtheory.com/forum, especially to the String - M Theory - Duality subforum of their Forum section (membership is free, and archives are open to members, and many of my postings are in the ar

Re: Tegmark's TOE & Cantor's Absolute Infinity

2002-09-23 Thread Hal Finney
I have gone back to Tegmark's paper, which is discussed informally at http://www.hep.upenn.edu/~max/toe.html and linked from http://arXiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9704009. I see that Russell is right, and that Tegmark does identify mathematical structures with formal systems. His chart at the first link ab

Re: Tegmark's TOE & Cantor's Absolute Infinity

2002-09-23 Thread Hal Finney
Russell Standish writes: > [Hal Finney writes;] > > So I disagree with Russell on this point; I'd say that Tegmark's > > mathematical structures are more than axiom systems and therefore > > Tegmark's TOE is different from Schmidhuber's. > > If you are so sure of this, then please provide a descri

New edition of ``Fields´´

2002-09-23 Thread Saibal Mitra
The new edition of Siegel's textbook ``Fields´´ can be downloaded from:   http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-th/9912205   Saibal