On Monday, September 23, 2002, at 11:34 AM, Hal Finney wrote:
> I have gone back to Tegmark's paper, which is discussed informally
> at http://www.hep.upenn.edu/~max/toe.html and linked from
> http://arXiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9704009.
>
> I see that Russell is right, and that Tegmark does identify
>
From: Osher Doctorow [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mon. Sept. 23, 2002 12:32PM
I refer readers to http://www.superstringtheory.com/forum, especially to the
String - M Theory - Duality subforum of their Forum section (membership is
free, and archives are open to members, and many of my postings are in the
ar
I have gone back to Tegmark's paper, which is discussed informally
at http://www.hep.upenn.edu/~max/toe.html and linked from
http://arXiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9704009.
I see that Russell is right, and that Tegmark does identify mathematical
structures with formal systems. His chart at the first link ab
Russell Standish writes:
> [Hal Finney writes;]
> > So I disagree with Russell on this point; I'd say that Tegmark's
> > mathematical structures are more than axiom systems and therefore
> > Tegmark's TOE is different from Schmidhuber's.
>
> If you are so sure of this, then please provide a descri
The new edition of Siegel's textbook ``Fields´´ can be
downloaded from:
http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-th/9912205
Saibal
5 matches
Mail list logo