RE: The Time Deniers and the idea of time as a "dimension"

2005-07-19 Thread "Hal Finney"
Physicist Max Tegmark has an interesting discussion on the physics of a universe with more than one time dimension at http://space.mit.edu/home/tegmark/dimensions.html , specifically http://space.mit.edu/home/tegmark/dimensions.pdf . In the excerpts below, n is the number of space dimensions and m

RE: The Time Deniers and the idea of time as a "dimension"

2005-07-19 Thread Jesse Mazer
chris peck wrote: Thats why I make an appeal to something more intuitive. The A List as concieved by McTaggart may lead to incoherence, but nevertheless, we are embedded in the present. To meddle with its order is to conjure up paradox. Reality can not be like that. But are you just expres

Re: The Time Deniers and the idea of time as a "dimension"

2005-07-19 Thread Stephen Paul King
Hi Chris, Thank you for a very interesting discussion of McTaggart's ideas, frankly after reading Huw Price's "Time's Arrow and Archimedes' Point,", I abandoned any hope of them being useful. My current favorite contender for an model of time is that of a perpetually ongoing computation; th

RE: The Time Deniers and the idea of time as a "dimension"

2005-07-19 Thread chris peck
Hi Stephen; Once again thanks for your comprehensive reply, Ive got a reply for one bit of it so far: > [SPK] > 'Does a "history"" include values that can be associated with either of > McTaggart's A or B series?' > [CP] > There is a strong argument to suppose it can be. The B series seems to