Re: Artificial Philosophizing

2006-02-07 Thread daddycaylor
Georges wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So Bruno says that: a) I am a machine. b) ...no man can grasp all aspect of man Tom says that to philosophize is one aspect of humanness that is more than a machine (i.e. simply following a set of instructions). Jef and Brent say that we are machines

Re: Artificial Philosophizing

2006-02-07 Thread Quentin Anciaux
Hi Tom, Le Mardi 7 Février 2006 18:03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit : If we truly are machines, then by definition we should be able to (in theory) figure out the list of instructions that we follow. But wouldn't this be grasping all aspects of ourselves? If not, then what part of ourselves

Re: Artificial Philosophizing

2006-02-07 Thread Jef Allbright
On 2/7/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So Bruno says that: a) I am a machine. b) ...no man can grasp all aspect of man A and b above both make sense to me. Jef and Brent say that we are machines who (that?) philosophize. I'll agree that was implied by my statement. I