We are all playing the game of 'Eternity' ;) I have uploaded to the
list my final version of the top-level 'solution' to the puzzle of
eternity. (Revised yet again but this one is the very last -
promise).
The page is my domain model for all reality at the highest possible
level of
On 20/08/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 19, 11:17 pm, Giu1i0 Pri5c0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Marc welcome back! I had not seen you here for months.
No. That's because after the terrible insults levelled at me by some...
Surely not on this list!
--
Stathis
On Aug 20, 9:26 pm, Stathis Papaioannou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20/08/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 19, 11:17 pm, Giu1i0 Pri5c0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Marc welcome back! I had not seen you here for months.
No. That's because after the terrible insults
On 20/08/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now consider sentient agent motivations (and remember the analogy with
the physics argument I gave above).
*Consider an agent with a set of motivations A
*Consider the transition of that agent to a different set of
motivations B (ie
Le 19-août-07, à 08:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
On Aug 19, 12:26 am, Stathis Papaioannou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This all makes sense if you are referring to the values of a
particular entity. Objectively, the entity has certain values and we
can use empirical means to determine
I searched in vain for
http://marc.geddes.googlepages.com/MCRT_ClassDiagram.html
The page you have requested could not be found. (404)
As an explanation of the meaning of eternal truth etcetera, this
to me seems redolent of Douglas [of blessed memory] Adams'
God's last words to His/Her
On Aug 21, 3:10 am, Mark Peaty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I searched in vain
forhttp://marc.geddes.googlepages.com/MCRT_ClassDiagram.html
The page you have requested could not be found. (404)
As an explanation of the meaning of eternal truth etcetera, this
to me seems redolent of Douglas
On Aug 20, 10:01 pm, Bruno Marchal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, that's not what I'm referring to. I'm referring to 'Abstract
Universals' - Platonic Ideals that all observers with complete
information would agree with.
Even in the restricted arithmetical Platonia, no observer can have
On Aug 20, 9:45 pm, Stathis Papaioannou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20/08/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now consider sentient agent motivations (and remember the analogy with
the physics argument I gave above).
*Consider an agent with a set of motivations A
On Aug 20, 10:01 pm, Bruno Marchal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le 19-août-07, à 08:07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
But apparently, like Chalmers, you seem to dismiss even the possibility
of comp. OK?
Sorry, I meant to say in previous post that my version property is NOT
quite the same as
10 matches
Mail list logo
