On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 07:56:21PM -0700, Greg Egan wrote:
>
> Hi Russell, thanks very much for your reply.
>
> It's possible that I'm arguing at cross-purposes here, because I
> gather that the whole reason for this list is to discuss models of the
> universe that are very different from standa
Hi Russell, thanks very much for your reply.
It's possible that I'm arguing at cross-purposes here, because I
gather that the whole reason for this list is to discuss models of the
universe that are very different from standard cosmology, but I hope
you won't mind if I pursue a defence of my spec
Hi Greg, and welcome to the list. Your ears must be burning - you have
often been talked about here, always in a good light!
On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 09:28:07PM -0700, Greg Egan wrote:
>
> On Jun 13, 9:25 am, Russell Standish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure his application of Bayes
Hi Stathis, hi Greg,
Le 14-juin-08, à 10:35, Stathis Papaioannou a écrit :
> 2008/6/14 Greg Egan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> The context in which I was discussing this at the N-Category Café is
>> the claim by some cosmologists that we ought to favour A-type
>> cosmological theories in which clas
2008/6/14 Greg Egan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The context in which I was discussing this at the N-Category Café is
> the claim by some cosmologists that we ought to favour A-type
> cosmological theories in which class 2 observers like us, with a clear
> Darwinian history, will not be outnumbered (ove
5 matches
Mail list logo
