On 14 Dec 2008, at 03:30, A. Wolf wrote:
One of the reasons I rarely post to this list is that many people here
seem trapped in an eternal series of meaningless essentialistic
debates.
Who ? Where ? How? (I hope you are alluding to the materialists here).
Nothing objective or
On 13 Dec 2008, at 18:27, John Mikes wrote:
Bruno wrote:
...I am not my body - I am not my brain --
I can change everything and anything I want about me and still
remain me ergo I am an immaterial something: probably a number or
a very long bitstring which can, like any data, be
On 12 Dec 2008, at 23:38, ronaldheld wrote:
Bruno:
I am uncertain that this was answered.
You are starting with mathematics,
Not really. I am starting with the real world. I assume you have a
brain disease and that your doctor proposed to you an artificial
digital, supposedly
Hi Kim,
On 13 Dec 2008, at 02:27, Kim Jones wrote:
Isn't it great that we may soon be able to capture the soul to
disk You could have a Catholic soul, try an Islamic soul, reboot
as a Buddhist - any religion you want
I am not sure someone will say yes to a doctor who propose an
Dear Anna,
I think this is the first time I reflect to your post and I found them
reasonable, well informed. You wrote:
..*some subjective experience of personhood or* being *that we all share*,
and each of us presumably experiences *something* like that.
I emphasize the 'something': who knows
..*some subjective experience of personhood or* being *that we all
share*,
and each of us presumably experiences *something* like that.
I emphasize the 'something': who knows if we experience (share?) the same
feeling? The words we use to describe it are not more relevant than
describing
A. Wolf wrote:
..*some subjective experience of personhood or* being *that we all
share*,
and each of us presumably experiences *something* like that.
I emphasize the 'something': who knows if we experience (share?) the same
feeling? The words we use to describe it are not more relevant
A. Wolf wrote:
..*some subjective experience of personhood or* being *that we all
share*,
and each of us presumably experiences *something* like that.
I emphasize the 'something': who knows if we experience (share?) the same
feeling? The words we use to describe it are not more relevant
On 15/12/2008, at 2:16 PM, Colin Hales wrote:
An ability to deny self-awareness as a marker of self awareness. You
can use this as a logical bootstrap to sort things out.
I like it!
cheers
colin hales
Anyone remember George Levy? Here is what he said about this:
..this only proves
9 matches
Mail list logo
