Hi Kim and all,
On 23 Dec 2008, at 11:50, Kim Jones wrote:
Bruno,
things are starting to hang together in my new digital brain (bright
yellow)
Good.
you wrote the plan:
---
A) UDA (Universal Dovetailer Argument)
1) I explain that if you are a machine, you
Bruno and Kim,
enjoyable discours by two math.-ly impaired minds (excuse me Kim!) - I met
several youngsters (up to 70 y.o.) who simply had no 'pitch' to math - yet
were good smart artists, even business(wo)men, parents and technicians (not
so with politicians, they are not what I call 'smart').
On 24 Dec 2008, at 16:41, Günther Greindl wrote:
Kim, Bruno,
Not at all. You have already done the first and last leap of faith of
the reasoning when accepting the digital brain at the first step. I
am
aware that you are not aware of that, because in the reply you seem
to
believe
Bruno,
I agree with Gunther about the two types of machine. The broader
machine is any system that can be logically described-- a system that
is governed by rules and has a definite description. Such machines are
of course not necessarily computable; oracle machines and so on can be
logically
4 matches
Mail list logo
