Hi Abram:
My sentence structure could have been better. The Nothing(s) encompass no
distinction but need to respond to the stability question. So they have an
unavoidable necessity to encompass this distinction. At some point they
spontaneously change nature and become Somethings. The
If Quantum Immortality (QI) is true, then we can ask the question what
is the TYPICAL history for an immortal. The typical history (or the
typical time/space trajectory) would be the path most of the immortals
take (and remember that in QI all of us are immortals)
For each immortal history its
kla...@bkpsecurity.com wrote:
If Quantum Immortality (QI) is true, then we can ask the question what
is the TYPICAL history for an immortal. The typical history (or the
typical time/space trajectory) would be the path most of the immortals
take (and remember that in QI all of us are
Why shouldn't a more natural process prevent Alice from doing this
experiment with the lottery? Something far more probable than winning the
million which does not let this quantum trick happen? This would be similar
to the reasoning you applied to the quantum suicide. It could be much more
4 matches
Mail list logo
