On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 8:38 PM, David Nymandavid.ny...@gmail.com wrote:
In COMP, the 'mechanism and language of dreams' is
posited to be those elements of the number realm and its operators
that are deemed necessary to instantiate a 'universal TM' (i.e. one
that - assuming CT to be true - is
On 17 July, 08:08, Rex Allen rexallen...@gmail.com wrote:
But taking a more platonic view, abstract concepts also exist. And if
this is so, could we not just as well say that our conscious
subjective experience is formed from particular configurations of
these platonically existing
Hi David,
I comment your post with an apology to Kim and Marty, then I make a
comment to Marty, and then I comment your (very nice) post.
Kim, Marty, I apologize for my bad sense of humor. Rereading some
post, I realize some nuance in the tone does not go through mailings.
Please indulge
Bruno,
Be assured that I still fully intend to follow the logic of UDA as
far as I can. And I'm grateful for your frequent efforts to suggest its meaning
in words and to explain why words alone are inadequate. I wonder if you could
clarify your use of the term supervene in the
2009/7/17 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be:
You are correct about truth and provability. You may have insisted a bit
more on the first person/third person important , and still unsolved, to be
sure, relationship, and the first person indeterminacy which follows. You
certainly motivate me to
Marty,
Be assured that I still fully intend to follow the logic
of UDA as far as I can. And I'm grateful for your frequent efforts
to suggest its meaning in words and to explain why words alone are
inadequate. I wonder if you could clarify your use of the term
supervene
6 matches
Mail list logo
