2009/7/28 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be:
Now, the question why this 1-OM and not that other one, is like the
questions:
- why do I feel myself in W, and not in M which is very natural for the
one going out at W.
- why do I feel myself in M, and not in W which is very natural for the
Ronald,
On 28 Jul 2009, at 12:51, ronaldheld wrote:
Bruno:
I meant the mathematical formalism you are teaching us. When we
eventually get to the UDA steps, I wil be better able to do that
assessment.
OK.
Note that the first 6 steps have already be done recently, with Kim,
and even
2009/7/28 John Mikes jami...@gmail.com:
Hi John
I really do not expect from you to give adequate replies to all these
questions - it would make the grandkids of our grandkits scientifically
unemployed but you have unusual solutions and ideas and it may be
interesting to tape your mind..
SOLUTIONS
OK. I give the solution of the exercises of the last session, on the
cartesian product of sets.
I recall the definition of the product A X B.
A X B= {(x,y) such that x belongs to A and y belongs to B}
I gave A = {0, 1}, and B = {a, b}.
In this case, A X B = {(0,a), (0,
On 28 Jul 2009, at 20:06, Brent Meeker wrote:
David Nyman wrote:
2009/7/28 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be:
snip
David Nyman wrote:
However I have a wacky intuition: despite the platonic criterion of
co-existence, 1-person experience of the temporal dynamism (i.e.
sequentiality) of the
On 29 July, 17:32, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
Gosh, David, you are a champion for the difficult questions.
Merci maitre, but I really only meant this rhetorically! On behalf of
the One I assume that the cavalcade would be the preferable
alternative. I like your answer though.
David Nyman wrote:
...
In my various ramblings, I've tried to cut the whole Gordian knot of
what can coherently be said to exist, and within this the whole debate
on materialism, panpsychism, mind-body hard problems, causal closure
of the physical, etc. by a simple expediency which then
Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 28 Jul 2009, at 20:06, Brent Meeker wrote:
David Nyman wrote:
2009/7/28 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be:
snip
David Nyman wrote:
However I have a wacky intuition: despite the platonic criterion of
co-existence, 1-person experience of the temporal dynamism (i.e.
2009/7/29 Brent Meeker meeke...@dslextreme.com:
What do you make of Hume's observation, When I enter most intimately into
what
I call myself, I always stumble on some particular perception or other, of
heat
or cold, light or shade, love or hatred, pain or pleasure. I can never catch
9 matches
Mail list logo
