Re: Arguably The World's Greatest Woman

2009-11-14 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 14 Nov 2009, at 01:33, Brent Meeker wrote: Why should we use the term God in the sense of those who clearly have confused science with temporal authoritative argument? Because that's what most people who use the term mean. And if we tell them we're agnostic about God Who them? Which

Re: Arguably The World's Greatest Woman

2009-11-14 Thread John Mikes
Bruno, you navigate into perillous waters. Your statements are extremely smart and applicable - to a certain limit, at which they vanish into undecidedness. You chose arithmetic thinking as your anchor to firmness - it is your choice and it works for you. It does not work for me: I am still in

Re: Arguably The World's Greatest Woman

2009-11-14 Thread Brent Meeker
Bruno Marchal wrote: On 14 Nov 2009, at 01:33, Brent Meeker wrote: Why should we use the term God in the sense of those who clearly have confused science with temporal authoritative argument? Because that's what most people who use the term mean. And if we tell them we're agnostic about

Re: Arguably The World's Greatest Woman

2009-11-14 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 14 Nov 2009, at 22:33, Brent Meeker wrote: Bruno Marchal wrote: On 14 Nov 2009, at 01:33, Brent Meeker wrote: Why should we use the term God in the sense of those who clearly have confused science with temporal authoritative argument? Because that's what most people who use the term

Re: Arguably The World's Greatest Woman

2009-11-14 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 14 Nov 2009, at 17:48, John Mikes wrote: Bruno, you navigate into perillous waters. I know, but that is the fun. Life and everything interesting apperas on the border of the non controlable. Your statements are extremely smart and applicable - to a certain limit, at which they

Re: Arguably The World's Greatest Woman

2009-11-14 Thread Brent Meeker
Bruno Marchal wrote: On 14 Nov 2009, at 22:33, Brent Meeker wrote: Bruno Marchal wrote: On 14 Nov 2009, at 01:33, Brent Meeker wrote: Why should we use the term God in the sense of those who clearly have confused science with temporal authoritative argument?