Hi Bruno Marchal
Indeed, we can not code for [1p]. But we need not abandon
itr entirely, as you seem to have done, and as cognitive
theory has done. We can replace [1p] by its actions -
those of perception, in which terms are relational (subject: object).
You seem to deal with everything
Hi Stephen P. King
I don't recall ever finding a mistake in Leibniz's metaphysics, although
there is a serious shortcoming in not completely defining what a
substance is. How far down the scale of maginification must or can
or should one go ?
Leibniz seems to invite study, as he appearsd to
On 12/5/2012 5:15 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Stephen P. King
I don't recall ever finding a mistake in Leibniz's metaphysics,
Dear Roger,
I found his need to appeal to God to solve the PEH problem to be a
big mistake, but at least he had a good excuse and did work out many of
the needed
On Saturday, December 1, 2012 6:19:51 AM UTC-5, rclough wrote:
The final solution - How comp could work in the brain
Peirce is known to have borrowed some ideas from Locke,
the most likely one being Locke's philosophy of mind,
namely that the mind is a blank slate and that all
Hi Richard Ruquist
You still don't understand inextended variables. Since 1p
is inextended (it involves consciousness), 1p has no size,
so it could include an infinite number of universes.
[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
12/5/2012
Forever is a long time, especially near the end. -Woody
Roger does not understand my argument that the monads of string theory
are effectively inextended despite they being uniformly distributed
throughout the universe at a density of 10^90/cc because each monad
maps the entire universe instantly and they collectively form a BEC.
In addition they
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 9:24 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
a observer who did not want to play games and honestly wanted to convey
the maximum amount of information would NOT say from a first person view I
saw W or M. And I meant that me would say I saw M AND me would say
I saw W.
Hi Craig Weinberg
As I said, the numbers of comp are converted to analog form signals
and interfaced to the brain. The numbers in time are essentially
waveforms, even if they are pretty erratic. You output the numbers
through a f/2 filter as voltages and supply those to the brain.
[Roger
Hi Richard Ruquist
You still don't understand. You're confusing the map
(the monads, which you can think of as ideas or information)
with the territory (physical space).
It is the corporeal bodies of substances that the monads refer to,
not the monads themselves, are distributed in space,
Hi Stephen P. King
God isn't artificially inserted into L's metaphysics,
it's a necessary part, because everything else (the monads)
afre blind and passive. Just as necessary as the One is to Plato's metaphysics.
[Roger Clough], [rclo...@verizon.net]
12/5/2012
Forever is a long time,
Hi Bruno,
I found the quote I had been searching for:
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/kant-mind/
Kant thought that transcendental arguments were a priori or
yielded the a priori in all three ways. Nonetheless, at the heart of
this method is inference to the best explanation. When
Hi Bruno,
Another quote I can't find is one to the effect that
For every complex problem one can usually find simple
solutions that are almost always wrong.
This is the case with modern cognitive science:
1) It ignored Descartes' two substance (mind and brain)
solution to the mind/brain
Mapping refers to the perception of the monads.
The string theory monads exist in space
but have properties that effectively
put them outside of spacetime.
They are not simply ideas
if string theory is correct.
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Richard
L's monads have perception.
They sense the entire universe.
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Stephen P. King
God isn't artificially inserted into L's metaphysics,
it's a necessary part, because everything else (the monads)
afre blind and passive.
On 04 Dec 2012, at 14:43, Telmo Menezes wrote:
Dear Bruno,
FYI: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/06/080602160845.htm
15 people is not a serious sample, and then, to make it illegal you
have to compare with the long-term effect of other activities
(alcohol, breathing air in
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 1:51 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wheeler%27s_delayed_choice_experiment:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wheeler%27s_delayed_choice_experiment
If the experimenters know which slit it goes through, the photon will
behave as a
On 12/5/2012 10:53 AM, John Clark wrote:
Yes that other photon could give which-way information and if it still exists when its
twin hits the photographic plate (or electronic detector) no interference pattern will
form. But if quantum erasure is used to destroy the which-way information the
Hi Roger,
This is the case with modern cognitive science:
1) It ignored Descartes' two substance (mind and brain)
solution to the mind/brain problem in favor of treating
both substances as material.
A common criticism of dualism is the problem of interaction. If mind is
outside the
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com wrote:
Hi Roger,
This is the case with modern cognitive science:
1) It ignored Descartes' two substance (mind and brain)
solution to the mind/brain problem in favor of treating
both substances as material.
A common
Hi Richard,
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com
wrote:
Hi Roger,
This is the case with modern cognitive science:
1) It ignored Descartes' two substance (mind and brain)
On Wednesday, December 5, 2012 12:41:22 PM UTC-5, rclough wrote:
Hi Richard Ruquist
You still don't understand. You're confusing the map
(the monads, which you can think of as ideas or information)
with the territory (physical space).
It is the corporeal bodies of substances that
On 12/5/2012 12:45 PM, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Stephen P. King
God isn't artificially inserted into L's metaphysics,
it's a necessary part, because everything else (the monads)
afre blind and passive. Just as necessary as the One is to Plato's
metaphysics.
Dear Roger,
OK, it is just that
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com wrote:
Hi Richard,
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com
wrote:
Hi Roger,
This is the case with modern
On 12/5/2012 1:01 PM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
L's monads have perception.
They sense the entire universe.
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Roger Cloughrclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Stephen P. King
God isn't artificially inserted into L's metaphysics,
it's a necessary part, because everything
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 7:51 PM, Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.net wrote:
On 12/5/2012 1:01 PM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
L's monads have perception.
They sense the entire universe.
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Stephen P. King
God isn't
On Wednesday, December 5, 2012 1:41:43 AM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
On 12/4/2012 9:14 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Tuesday, December 4, 2012 6:27:42 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
On 12/4/2012 12:32 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Tuesday, December 4, 2012 2:52:25 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
On 12/5/2012 5:17 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Wednesday, December 5, 2012 1:41:43 AM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
On 12/4/2012 9:14 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Tuesday, December 4, 2012 6:27:42 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
On 12/4/2012 12:32 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On
On 12/5/2012 3:51 PM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
Hi Roger,
This is the case with modern cognitive science:
1) It ignored Descartes' two substance (mind and brain)
solution to the mind/brain problem in favor of treating
both substances as material.
A common criticism of dualism is
On 12/5/2012 8:17 PM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
I thought we had already agreed that the string monads formed a Stone
space in which the monads were totally distinctive.and therefore
disconnected. It then becomes a Boolean algebra but at a vastly
smaller scale than the atomic scale.
Dear Richard,
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.net wrote:
On 12/5/2012 8:17 PM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
I thought we had already agreed that the string monads formed a Stone
space in which the monads were totally distinctive.and therefore
disconnected. It then becomes a
On 12/5/2012 10:05 PM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
Monads are not strings.
They are compactified dimensions
and much smaller than strings
which really are waves or fields.
If monads were really outside of spacetime
they would not influence anything in spacetime.,
Dear Richard,
What are
On Wednesday, December 5, 2012 8:51:36 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
On 12/5/2012 5:17 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Wednesday, December 5, 2012 1:41:43 AM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
On 12/4/2012 9:14 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Tuesday, December 4, 2012 6:27:42 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
On
On Wednesday, December 5, 2012 12:35:33 PM UTC-5, rclough wrote:
Hi Craig Weinberg
As I said, the numbers of comp are converted to analog form signals
and interfaced to the brain. The numbers in time are essentially
waveforms, even if they are pretty erratic. You output the numbers
33 matches
Mail list logo
