Hi John,
On 14 Apr 2013, at 00:10, John Mikes wrote:
Bruno, I stand corrected (redface): I had a closed mind for NDE
considered only as the observable experience on the 'patient' in a
dying-like situation.
Your airplane-example opened my eyes: it may refer to experiences
when someone (a
This is thread is completely off-topic, but anyway:
The evolutionary roots of envy and social justice:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/93890864/Punitive-sentiment-against-successful-individuals-as-a-psychological-device-for-anti-hidden-free-riders-in-ancestral-hunter-gatherers
2013/4/14 Craig
From the Devo song Freedom of Choice:
In ancient Rome
There was a poem
About a dog
Who found two bones
He picked at one
He licked the other
He went in circles
He dropped dead
Freedom of choice
Is what you got
Freedom from choice
Is what you want
Thinking about the relationship
On Monday, April 15, 2013 5:56:31 AM UTC-4, Alberto G.Corona wrote:
This is thread is completely off-topic, but anyway:
The evolutionary roots of envy and social justice:
On 14 Apr 2013, at 23:45, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
On 15/04/2013, at 3:27 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
But of course that is not the case, as comp might be false,
logically. Indeed, it can be shown refutable, and if the evidences
were that physics is Newtonian, I would
On 15 Apr 2013, at 02:38, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Sunday, April 14, 2013 1:27:24 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 14 Apr 2013, at 00:05, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Saturday, April 13, 2013 6:47:47 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 11 Apr 2013, at 21:18, Craig Weinberg wrote:
With
On 14 Apr 2013, at 19:02, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Hi Bruno,
Unless we can explain how the *some first person plural
indeterminacy* obtains, it does not give a satisfactory explanation
of 'shared experience'.
Yes. Basically, getting the fits person plural is the same as getting
the
On 14 Apr 2013, at 19:21, Richard Ruquist wrote:
But Bruno, if comp only produces what is already known to science,
how do we know that comp is responsible? String theory has this
problem
We never know such thing. We can only propose a theory, derive facts,
and verify them. If the
Hi Bruno,
Interleaving
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 14 Apr 2013, at 19:02, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Hi Bruno,
Unless we can explain how the *some first person plural indeterminacy*
obtains,
it does not give a satisfactory explanation of
On 15 Apr 2013, at 15:27, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Hi Bruno,
Interleaving
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 9:05 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
On 14 Apr 2013, at 19:02, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Hi Bruno,
Unless we can explain how the *some first person plural
indeterminacy*
Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.com wrote:
The theory of evolution as proposed by Darwin is non-reductionist. It
relies on the concept of natural selection, which is an holistic concept.
That is entirely false. Natural selection is local, not just spatially but
temporally as well. Evolution
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 8:11 PM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.comwrote:
embody the Aquarian tension of revolutionary rationalism. symbolized by
the Saturnian-Uranian co-'rulership' of Aquarius. [...] With their
interesting combination of Mars in Libra squaring their Moon and trining
On 12 Apr 2013, at 17:39, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com
wrote:
Telmo,
I can only give you my opinion.
Thanks Richard.
You are of course referring to the double
slit experiment where one photon can follow at least two different
On 12 Apr 2013, at 16:15, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 3:30 AM, Stathis Papaioannou stath...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 5:35 AM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thursday, April 11, 2013 3:29:51 PM UTC-4, John Clark wrote:
On Thu, Apr 11,
On Monday, April 15, 2013 12:01:37 PM UTC-4, John Clark wrote:
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 8:11 PM, Craig Weinberg
whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
embody the Aquarian tension of revolutionary rationalism. symbolized by
the Saturnian-Uranian co-'rulership' of Aquarius. [...] With
Not true. GR and QM derived experimental results that were not known to
science before hand.
I suggest that comp has to do that otherwise it will remain a curious
metaphysics
but not accepted as knowledge.
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 14 Apr 2013,
On 4/15/2013 5:27 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
There are other reason as well. A Newtonian physics uses action at a distance, arguably
a non comp phenomenon.
Why would comp not accommodate action at a distance?
Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
On 09 Apr 2013, at 17:11, Telmo Menezes wrote:
The web of trust comes from PhDs from accredited Universities. That is
the deal that everyone accepts.
If only that was true. Not all academies play the rule. Separation of
power leaks so much (since Nixon, more or less), that even academies
In a message dated 4/14/2013 1:07:18 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
marc...@ulb.ac.be writes:
NDE might helps people in stress situation, of after being wounded. Given
the fact that humans seems to fight since a long time, that might convey
some evolutionary role. This does not logically
On 4/15/2013 9:01 AM, John Clark wrote:
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 8:11 PM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com
mailto:whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
embody the Aquarian tension of revolutionary rationalism. symbolized by
the
Saturnian-Uranian co-'rulership' of Aquarius. [...] With
On 4/15/2013 10:18 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 12 Apr 2013, at 17:39, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com wrote:
Telmo,
I can only give you my opinion.
Thanks Richard.
You are of course referring to the double
slit experiment where one
On Monday, April 15, 2013 3:48:17 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 4/15/2013 9:01 AM, John Clark wrote:
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 8:11 PM, Craig Weinberg
whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
embody the Aquarian tension of revolutionary rationalism. symbolized
by the Saturnian-Uranian
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 02:41:19PM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote:
You cannot be more right on this. It has been part of my job to show
that if the brain is Turing emulable, then the interior experience
is not at all isomorphic to brain activity. It is already done
explicitely in step seven
23 matches
Mail list logo
