Hi Hans Dieter Franke
Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.) [1/1/2000]
See my Leibniz site at
http://independent.academia.edu/RogerClough
- Receiving the following content -
From: Hans Dieter Franke
Receiver: 4DWorldx
Time: 2013-09-16, 02:50:58
Subject: Re: [4DWorldx] Fw:
On 15 Sep 2013, at 10:37, Telmo Menezes wrote:
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
On 14 Sep 2013, at 04:25, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Friday, September 13, 2013 9:42:54 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 12 Sep 2013, at 18:22, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On 15 Sep 2013, at 18:02, John Clark wrote:
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
Me:
Feynman predicted in 1948 that the magnetic moment of an electron
can't be exactly 1 in Dirac units as had been thought because it is
effected by an infinite (and I
On 15 Sep 2013, at 18:29, John Clark wrote:
On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
As long as you suggest that there are things made of things, you
are staying in the Aristotelian frame. Other can suggest that there
are no such things at all, just natural numbers
On 9/16/2013 5:35 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
With computationalism, it is more easy and clear. What exists, at the ontological level,
is what make true a sentence like ExP(x). So number exists, once we assume arithmetic
or combinators ..., because they make true Ex(x = x).
But this notion of
http://multisenserealism.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/identity3.jpg?w=595
http://multisenserealism.files.wordpress.com/2013/09/identity3.jpg?w=595
Here’s a crazy little number that I like to call the Non-Well-Founded
Identity Principle. It woke my boiling brain up a few times last night, so
The Hard Problem of consciousness asks why there is a gap between our
explanation of matter, or biology, or neurology, and our experience in the
first place. What is it there which even suggests to us that there should
be a gap, and why should there be a such thing as experience to stand
On Saturday, September 14, 2013 5:53:01 AM UTC-4, telmo_menezes wrote:
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Craig Weinberg
whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
On Friday, September 13, 2013 5:31:40 AM UTC-4, telmo_menezes wrote:
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Craig Weinberg
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
Feynman showed that virtual particles must exist, particles that can
violate the law of conservation of mass-energy, at least for a short time.
Feynman showed that when a particle moves from point X to point Y it can do
so by any
Dear Craig: a beautifully crafted post.
In my opinion the 'gap' is between what we (think we) know and what we
don't (even think we know). I tried so many times examples for such
gap-ideas by looking back 500, 1000, 3000 etc. years and compare it with
our present info-status (pls! do not mix my
Hah. Have they announced something? I hadn't heard.
No matter what game a computer beats a person at, the person is still the
only one playing a game.
Craig
On Saturday, September 14, 2013 12:41:46 AM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
For Craig: http://xkcd.com/1263/
Brent
--
You received this
11 matches
Mail list logo
