On Friday, July 25, 2014 9:15:10 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 24 Jul 2014, at 04:32, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Wednesday, July 23, 2014 2:36:24 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 22 Jul 2014, at 20:18, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Tuesday, July 22, 2014 1:56:26 PM
https://www.ted.com/talks/john_searle_our_shared_condition_consciousness
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
Hilarious! I've always had a soft spot for Searle. He writes very
well, he's much more entertaining than most philosophers and his
riveting 1984 series of Reith Lectures on the BBC re-ignited my
fascination with the topic. But his would-be-simple solution of the
mind-body problem holds up only so
On 24 July 2014 14:50, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
As I try to see if we disagree, or if it is just a problem of vocabulary, I
will make comment which might, or not be like I am nitpicking, and that
*might* be the case, and then I apologize.
No worries. I think some of it is just
On 27 Jul 2014, at 12:12, David Nyman wrote:
Hilarious! I've always had a soft spot for Searle. He writes very
well, he's much more entertaining than most philosophers and his
riveting 1984 series of Reith Lectures on the BBC re-ignited my
fascination with the topic.
Yes Searle is wrong and
On 25 Jul 2014, at 17:07, Richard Ruquist wrote:
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
On 23 Jul 2014, at 21:21, Richard Ruquist wrote:
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
On 22 Jul 2014, at 20:18, Craig
On 23 July 2014 17:49, Jesse Mazer laserma...@gmail.com wrote:
So, why not adopt a Tegmark-like view where a physical universe is
*nothing more* than a particular abstract computation, and that can give us
a well-defined notion of which sub-computations are performed within it by
various
On 25 Jul 2014, at 17:37, David Nyman wrote:
On 24 July 2014 22:18, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
To put it another way, there is nobody present for whom it could
represent a difference.
It still exist, or the difference 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, ... will need
itself a knower to make
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 10:46 AM, David Nyman da...@davidnyman.com wrote:
On 23 July 2014 17:49, Jesse Mazer laserma...@gmail.com wrote:
So, why not adopt a Tegmark-like view where a physical universe is
*nothing more* than a particular abstract computation, and that can give
us
a
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 4:40 AM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
https://www.ted.com/talks/john_searle_our_shared_condition_consciousness
As the inventor of the Chinese Room, the single stupidest thought
exparament in the history of the world, I don't understand how anyone can
still take anything
On 27 July 2014 17:27, Jesse Mazer laserma...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't see why that should follow at all, as long as there are multiple
infinite computations running rather than the UDA being the only one,
I may be missing some other point you're making, but I think this is
already dealt with
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 1:13 PM, David Nyman da...@davidnyman.com wrote:
On 27 July 2014 17:27, Jesse Mazer laserma...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't see why that should follow at all, as long as there are multiple
infinite computations running rather than the UDA being the only one,
I may be
On 27 July 2014 18:46, Jesse Mazer laserma...@gmail.com wrote:
But when you say by this point in the argument, do you mean there was
some
earlier step that established some good *reasons* for why we should abandon
the notion of a primitively-physical universe (or primitive universal
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 2:04 PM, David Nyman da...@davidnyman.com wrote:
On 27 July 2014 18:46, Jesse Mazer laserma...@gmail.com wrote:
But when you say by this point in the argument, do you mean there was
some
earlier step that established some good *reasons* for why we should
On 28 July 2014 04:51, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 4:40 AM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
https://www.ted.com/talks/john_searle_our_shared_condition_consciousness
As the inventor of the Chinese Room, the single stupidest thought
exparament in the history
On Sunday, July 27, 2014 5:55:33 PM UTC-4, Liz R wrote:
On 28 July 2014 04:51, John Clark johnk...@gmail.com javascript:
wrote:
On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 4:40 AM, LizR liz...@gmail.com javascript:
wrote:
https://www.ted.com/talks/john_searle_our_shared_condition_consciousness
As the
16 matches
Mail list logo
