On 11 Aug 2015, at 10:26 pm, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
No doubt that it would be interesting to look at. Salvia has been called a
cure of ... atheism (the non agnostic one 'course). Not that it makes you
believe in anything new, it just shows reasons to doubt more, and to
Thanks Bruce, that actually makes a lot of sense ... and kind of completely
trashes my previous understanding! It also makes QM weirder, and even makes
me doubt MWI, which reading Deutsch had convinced me was the true account.
On Tuesday, August 11, 2015 at 2:42:50 PM UTC+10, Bruce wrote:
Pierz wrote:
On Tuesday, August 11, 2015 at 6:08:31 PM UTC+10, Bruce wrote:
Pierz wrote:
Thanks Bruce, that actually makes a lot of sense ... and kind of
completely trashes my previous understanding! It also makes QM
weirder,
and even makes me doubt MWI, which
BTW there is an amusing paper by (the manyworlder) Lev Vaidman.
http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9609006
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
Oh I'd enjoy that test! :) But I'd enjoy even more administering it to John
Clarke. I suspect I already know the result however.
On Tuesday, August 11, 2015 at 10:09:42 AM UTC+10, Kim Jones wrote:
OK - perhaps this post is not entirely serious. I don't actually know.
There appears to be no
Thanks - that looks interesting! I'll be reading that on the train
tonight...
On Tuesday, August 11, 2015 at 4:10:00 PM UTC+10, scerir wrote:
BTW there is an amusing paper by (the manyworlder) Lev Vaidman.
http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9609006
--
You received this message because
On Tuesday, August 11, 2015 at 6:08:31 PM UTC+10, Bruce wrote:
Pierz wrote:
Thanks Bruce, that actually makes a lot of sense ... and kind of
completely trashes my previous understanding! It also makes QM weirder,
and even makes me doubt MWI, which reading Deutsch had convinced me was
Pierz wrote:
Thanks Bruce, that actually makes a lot of sense ... and kind of
completely trashes my previous understanding! It also makes QM weirder,
and even makes me doubt MWI, which reading Deutsch had convinced me was
the true account.
MWI is popular, but it is not without its problems.
On 11 Aug 2015, at 02:09, Kim Jones wrote:
OK - perhaps this post is not entirely serious. I don't actually know.
There appears to be no reliable test of idiocy. Even people who
invite others to participate in games of running along a lawn while
a drone fires rockets at them may not
On 11 Aug 2015, at 10:55, Pierz wrote:
Oh I'd enjoy that test! :) But I'd enjoy even more administering it
to John Clarke. I suspect I already know the result however.
I agree, but it is not entirely obvious, as I think John C does not
lie to himself, only to us.
Sometimes, I am not sure
On 11 Aug 2015, at 01:43, John Clark wrote:
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 4:50 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
there will be only one 1-view from any of the two 3-1 p view
Oh no, now we have the two 3-1 p view!
We have this since the beginning.
3-JC is refers to the
On 11 Aug 2015, at 11:40, Bruce Kellett wrote:
Pierz wrote:
On Tuesday, August 11, 2015 at 6:08:31 PM UTC+10, Bruce wrote:
Pierz wrote:
Thanks Bruce, that actually makes a lot of sense ... and kind
of
completely trashes my previous understanding! It also makes QM
weirder,
On 11 August 2015 at 07:09, 'scerir' via Everything List
everything-list@googlegroups.com wrote:
BTW there is an amusing paper by (the manyworlder) Lev Vaidman.
http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9609006
Nice paper (from a while back). AFAICT his resolution of the indeterminacy
issue in MWI is
On 12 Aug 2015, at 9:42 am, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
If you think you have a sure fire way to identify an idiot...it's you.
Brent
You, sir - are no one’s idiot.
Kim
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To
If you think you have a sure fire way to identify an idiot...it's you.
Brent
On 8/11/2015 4:06 PM, Kim Jones wrote:
On 11 Aug 2015, at 10:26 pm, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
mailto:marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
No doubt that it would be interesting to look at. Salvia has been called a cure
So here's an excerpt from this paper: h
ttp://arxiv.org/pdf/quant-ph/9609006v1.pdf, which was recently linked in
response to a question I asked about MWI. This seems to echo *exactly* your
concerns about identity/pronouns in the duplication experiment, and to
resolve them, even though this
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
Oh no, now we have the two 3-1 p view
!
We have this since the beginning.
That explains your profound confusion.
You can say that both copies have the 1-view of the H-guy,
Regardless of how many bodies
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:55 AM, Pierz pier...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh I'd enjoy that test! :) But I'd enjoy even more administering it to
John Clarke. I suspect I already know the result however.
Idiot or not at least John Clark knows how to spell his last name.
John K Clark
--
For each according to their observation state, to each according to their
needs.
Bawh hah hah, Tovaritch. Is good?
-Original Message-
From: David Nyman da...@davidnyman.com
To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tue, Aug 11, 2015 1:57 pm
Subject: Re: Re: MWI
On Wednesday, August 12, 2015 at 10:51:37 AM UTC+10, John Clark wrote:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 4:55 AM, Pierz pie...@gmail.com javascript:
wrote:
Oh I'd enjoy that test! :) But I'd enjoy even more administering it to
John Clarke. I suspect I already know the result however.
20 matches
Mail list logo
