Re: flat vs asymptotically flat universe

2017-11-10 Thread agrayson2000
On Friday, November 10, 2017 at 11:32:13 PM UTC-7, agrays...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > On Friday, November 10, 2017 at 11:22:45 PM UTC-7, Brent wrote: >> >> >> >> On 11/10/2017 10:01 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> >> >> On Friday, November 10, 2017 at 2:16:04 PM UTC-7, Brent wrote: >>>

Re: flat vs asymptotically flat universe

2017-11-10 Thread agrayson2000
On Friday, November 10, 2017 at 11:22:45 PM UTC-7, Brent wrote: > > > > On 11/10/2017 10:01 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > On Friday, November 10, 2017 at 2:16:04 PM UTC-7, Brent wrote: >> >> >> >> On 11/10/2017 1:01 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> >> >> On Friday, November 10,

Re: flat vs asymptotically flat universe

2017-11-10 Thread Brent Meeker
On 11/10/2017 10:01 PM, agrayson2...@gmail.com wrote: On Friday, November 10, 2017 at 2:16:04 PM UTC-7, Brent wrote: On 11/10/2017 1:01 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote: On Friday, November 10, 2017 at 12:19:05 PM UTC-7, Brent wrote: On 11/10/2017 4:06 AM, Alan Grayson

Re: Interference of Probability Waves

2017-11-10 Thread Brent Meeker
Renormalization. On 11/10/2017 9:56 PM, agrayson2...@gmail.com wrote: How is the resultant value kept between 0 and 1? TIA. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,

Re: flat vs asymptotically flat universe

2017-11-10 Thread agrayson2000
On Friday, November 10, 2017 at 2:16:04 PM UTC-7, Brent wrote: > > > > On 11/10/2017 1:01 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > On Friday, November 10, 2017 at 12:19:05 PM UTC-7, Brent wrote: >> >> >> >> On 11/10/2017 4:06 AM, Alan Grayson wrote: >> >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 10:32 PM,

Interference of Probability Waves

2017-11-10 Thread agrayson2000
How is the resultant value kept between 0 and 1? TIA. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post

Re: Consistency of Postulates of QM

2017-11-10 Thread Alan Grayson
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 12:46 PM, John Clark wrote: > On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 10:43 AM, wrote: > > ​> ​ >> If the measurement problem were solved in the sense being able to predict >> exact outcomes, >> > > ​That's not the measurement problem, its

Re: flat vs asymptotically flat universe

2017-11-10 Thread Brent Meeker
On 11/10/2017 1:01 PM, agrayson2...@gmail.com wrote: On Friday, November 10, 2017 at 12:19:05 PM UTC-7, Brent wrote: On 11/10/2017 4:06 AM, Alan Grayson wrote: On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 10:32 PM, Brent Meeker wrote: On 11/9/2017 9:15 PM, Alan

Re: flat vs asymptotically flat universe

2017-11-10 Thread Alan Grayson
On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 12:19 PM, Brent Meeker wrote: > > > On 11/10/2017 4:06 AM, Alan Grayson wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 10:32 PM, Brent Meeker > wrote: > >> >> >> On 11/9/2017 9:15 PM, Alan Grayson wrote: >> >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017

Re: flat vs asymptotically flat universe

2017-11-10 Thread agrayson2000
On Friday, November 10, 2017 at 12:19:05 PM UTC-7, Brent wrote: > > > > On 11/10/2017 4:06 AM, Alan Grayson wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 10:32 PM, Brent Meeker > wrote: > >> >> >> On 11/9/2017 9:15 PM, Alan Grayson wrote: >> >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 10:05

Re: Consistency of Postulates of QM

2017-11-10 Thread John Clark
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 10:43 AM, wrote: ​> ​ > If the measurement problem were solved in the sense being able to predict > exact outcomes, > ​That's not the measurement problem, its determining if how and why observation effects things. ​ ​> ​ > thus making QM a

Re: flat vs asymptotically flat universe

2017-11-10 Thread Brent Meeker
On 11/10/2017 4:06 AM, Alan Grayson wrote: On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 10:32 PM, Brent Meeker > wrote: On 11/9/2017 9:15 PM, Alan Grayson wrote: On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 10:05 PM, Brent Meeker

Re: Consistency of Postulates of QM

2017-11-10 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 09 Nov 2017, at 16:43, agrayson2...@gmail.com wrote: If the measurement problem were solved in the sense being able to predict exact outcomes, ? Quantum Mechanics would be refuted (with or without wave packet reduction). thus making QM a deterministic theory, You mean

Re: flat vs asymptotically flat universe

2017-11-10 Thread Alan Grayson
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 10:32 PM, Brent Meeker wrote: > > > On 11/9/2017 9:15 PM, Alan Grayson wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 10:05 PM, Brent Meeker > wrote: > >> >> >> On 11/9/2017 8:55 PM, agrayson2...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> >> >> On Thursday,