Re: Entanglement

On Friday, April 6, 2018 at 4:04:55 PM UTC, agrays...@gmail.com wrote: > > > > On Friday, April 6, 2018 at 2:45:40 PM UTC, Lawrence Crowell wrote: >> >> On Thursday, April 5, 2018 at 3:20:39 PM UTC-5, agrays...@gmail.com >> wrote: >>> >>> Assuming that QM is a non-local theory, if two systems

Re: Entanglement

On Friday, April 6, 2018 at 2:45:40 PM UTC, Lawrence Crowell wrote: > > On Thursday, April 5, 2018 at 3:20:39 PM UTC-5, agrays...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> Assuming that QM is a non-local theory, if two systems become entangled, >> say via a measurement, do they necessary have a non-local

Re: Wave Functions again

On Friday, April 6, 2018 at 2:39:35 PM UTC, Lawrence Crowell wrote: > > On Thursday, April 5, 2018 at 12:25:02 AM UTC-5, agrays...@gmail.com > wrote: >> >> Does a macro object, say a billiard ball, have a definite wave function? >> That is, does it have one in principle, even if it can't be

Re: Entanglement

On Thursday, April 5, 2018 at 3:20:39 PM UTC-5, agrays...@gmail.com wrote: > > Assuming that QM is a non-local theory, if two systems become entangled, > say via a measurement, do they necessary have a non-local connection? That > is, does entanglement necessarily imply non-locality? AG >

Re: Wave Functions again

On Thursday, April 5, 2018 at 12:25:02 AM UTC-5, agrays...@gmail.com wrote: > > Does a macro object, say a billiard ball, have a definite wave function? > That is, does it have one in principle, even if it can't be written down? > If one can speak of the wf of the universe, one would think

Re: Applied General Intelligence

On 8 March 2018 at 21:22, Brent Meeker wrote: > Google has tensorflow available online. I don't recommend anyone trying to use it directly. It's very nice but it comes with a lot o Google-isms that are very hard to figure out. I recommend Keras: https://keras.io/ It