On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 09:45:35AM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> The quantum vacuum is not vacuum at all. Then there are as many notion of
> nothing than there are notions of thing. If the thing are number, the nothing
> is the number zero. If the things are sets, the nothing is the empty set,
On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 02:27:49PM -0500, Jason Resch wrote:
> It looks like Bruno's idea of extracting physics from all computations is
> catching on. I came across this article:
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solomonoff%27s_theory_of_inductive_inference
...
I also want to comment that this
On Sun, Jul 01, 2018 at 12:36:19AM +0200, smitra wrote:
> On 30-06-2018 21:27, Jason Resch wrote:
> > It looks like Bruno's idea of extracting physics from all computations
> > is catching on. I came across this article:
> >
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solomonoff%27s_theory_of_inductive_infe
On 30-06-2018 21:27, Jason Resch wrote:
It looks like Bruno's idea of extracting physics from all computations
is catching on. I came across this article:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solomonoff%27s_theory_of_inductive_inference
[1]
And this idea (from the 1960s) is being used in recent papers
It looks like Bruno's idea of extracting physics from all computations is
catching on. I came across this article:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solomonoff%27s_theory_of_inductive_inference
And this idea (from the 1960s) is being used in recent papers, such as this
one: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1712
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 5:24 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
*> Nowhere anybody has ever defended the idea that books or texts can
> think. You are the only one mentioning that*
I don’t believe that’s true. There is a fellow by the name of Bruno Marchal
who is constantly mentioning that pure mathemati
6 matches
Mail list logo
