On Sun, Sep 2, 2018 at 2:19 PM Bruno Marchal wrote:
> A function is computable if we can explain to a dumb (but docile) human
> being how to compute it, on any of its argument.
>
And some functions (the Sine function for example) can be proven to be
computable and some functions (the Busy
Philip Thrift
> *A working definition of matter: That which stores, transmits, or
> executes code.*
That's not bad, that's not bad at all. I wish I'd said that!
John K Clark
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe
Bruno Marchal Wrote:
*> I cannot see primary matter. In fact I am not sure what you mean by
> matter, or by “mathematical-material universe”. [...] I have proven (40
> years ago) that materialism (the belief in some primary matter, or
> physicalism) and Mechanism are incompatible.*
If you don't
On Saturday, September 8, 2018 at 4:00:41 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 7 Sep 2018, at 14:43, Philip Thrift >
> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Friday, September 7, 2018 at 3:59:08 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 6 Sep 2018, at 21:48, Philip Thrift wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thursday,
> On 7 Sep 2018, at 14:43, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
> On Friday, September 7, 2018 at 3:59:08 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>> On 6 Sep 2018, at 21:48, Philip Thrift >
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, September 6, 2018 at 11:47:46 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>>> On 6 Sep
On Friday, September 7, 2018 at 8:07:51 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
>
>
>
> On 9/7/2018 5:35 PM, Martin Abramson wrote:
>
> Are you saying that galaxies etc. moving away ftl are not moving
> relative to spacetime because spacetime is expanding at the same scale
> factor? Is the universe, as it
6 matches
Mail list logo
