On Monday, February 25, 2019 at 6:04:28 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2/25/2019 8:55 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> > Fictionalism does not apply to the arithmetical reality, nor to
> > physics, but to the naïve idea of a “physical universe” as being the
> > fundamental reality. The theology o
On 2/25/2019 8:55 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Fictionalism does not apply to the arithmetical reality, nor to
physics, but to the naïve idea of a “physical universe” as being the
fundamental reality. The theology of the universal machine is a priori
quite non Aristotelian: there is no Creator,
via
https://twitter.com/JDHamkins/status/1100090709527408640
Joel David Hamkins @JDHamkins
*Must there be numbers we cannot describe or define? Definability in
mathematics and the Math Tea argument*
Pure Mathematics Research Seminar at the University of East Anglia in
Norwich on Monday, 25 Fe
> On 25 Feb 2019, at 11:52, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, February 25, 2019 at 3:34:15 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>> On 22 Feb 2019, at 18:44, Philip Thrift >
>> wrote:
>>
>> Some accept the possibility that there can be something that is immaterial.
>
> Yes. We call them “
> On 25 Feb 2019, at 12:39, Lawrence Crowell
> wrote:
>
> On Monday, February 25, 2019 at 2:44:14 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>> On 24 Feb 2019, at 15:24, Lawrence Crowell > > wrote:
>>
>> On Friday, February 22, 2019 at 3:18:01 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2/22/2019 11:39 AM, La
On Monday, February 25, 2019 at 2:44:14 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 24 Feb 2019, at 15:24, Lawrence Crowell > wrote:
>
> On Friday, February 22, 2019 at 3:18:01 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2/22/2019 11:39 AM, Lawrence Crowell wrote:
>>
>> This sounds almost tautological. I ha
On Monday, February 25, 2019 at 3:34:15 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 22 Feb 2019, at 18:44, Philip Thrift >
> wrote:
>
>
> Some accept the possibility that there can be something that is immaterial.
>
>
> Yes. We call them “mathematician”.
>
> Bruno
>
>
>
This recent thesis I came acr
> On 22 Feb 2019, at 18:44, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
> On Friday, February 22, 2019 at 3:57:49 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>> On 21 Feb 2019, at 20:26, Philip Thrift >
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, February 21, 2019 at 8:23:15 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>>> On 18 Feb 2
> On 24 Feb 2019, at 15:24, Lawrence Crowell
> wrote:
>
> On Friday, February 22, 2019 at 3:18:01 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote:
>
>
> On 2/22/2019 11:39 AM, Lawrence Crowell wrote:
>> This sounds almost tautological. I have not read Masanes' paper, but he
>> seems to be saying the Born rule is a ma
9 matches
Mail list logo