Re: Intel's Newest $350 Million Machine

Le jeu. 18 avr. 2024 à 23:35, Brent Meeker a écrit : > > > On 4/18/2024 1:29 PM, John Clark wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 4:00 PM Brent Meeker > wrote: > > >> >> * > Or the driving force is hype >> https://youtu.be/vQChW_jgMMM?si=ZbiTWL1AymA3nhEN >>

Re: [Extropolis] Re: Irrational mechanics, draft Ch. 14

Le dim. 24 mars 2024, 12:41, John Clark a écrit : > On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 9:46 PM Brent Meeker > wrote: > > >> And perhaps a simpler explanation is that ET does not exist because we >>> are the first, after all the observable universe is finite in both >>> space and time so somebody's got to

Re: The Nature of Contingency: Quantum Physics as Modal Realism

Le sam. 14 mai 2022, 04:06, John Clark a écrit : > On Fri, May 13, 2022 at 9:46 PM Stathis Papaioannou > wrote: > > *>>> Explaining the values of the probabilities isn't the problem with MWI, it's explaining that there are probabilities* >>> >>> >>> >> That's easy in MWI. Probabilities

Re: The Nature of Contingency: Quantum Physics as Modal Realism

Le mar. 19 avr. 2022 à 11:33, Bruce Kellett a écrit : > On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 6:04 PM Quentin Anciaux > wrote: > >> Le mar. 19 avr. 2022 à 09:27, Bruce Kellett a >> écrit : >> >>> On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 5:19 PM Quentin Anciaux >>> wrote: >>

Re: The Nature of Contingency: Quantum Physics as Modal Realism

Le mar. 19 avr. 2022 à 09:27, Bruce Kellett a écrit : > On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 5:19 PM Quentin Anciaux > wrote: > >> Le mar. 19 avr. 2022 à 09:14, Bruce Kellett a >> écrit : >> >>> On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 4:52 PM Quentin Anciaux >>> wrote: >>

Re: The Nature of Contingency: Quantum Physics as Modal Realism

Le mar. 19 avr. 2022 à 09:14, Bruce Kellett a écrit : > On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 4:52 PM Quentin Anciaux > wrote: > >> Le mar. 19 avr. 2022 à 03:20, Bruce Kellett a >> écrit : >> >>> On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 11:09 AM Brent Meeker >>> wrote: >>&

Re: The Nature of Contingency: Quantum Physics as Modal Realism

Le mar. 19 avr. 2022 à 03:20, Bruce Kellett a écrit : > On Tue, Apr 19, 2022 at 11:09 AM Brent Meeker > wrote: > >> On 4/17/2022 1:45 PM, George Kahrimanis wrote: >> >> Just as in Schroedinger's famous example with the cat, you need a "box" >> and an observer outside, in order to make sense of

Re: AlphaZero

The only thing I hope AI will achieve is to be less condescending... if it achieves true understanding, I hope it will be humble... and as far as John Clark dislikes religions and God, the singularity will be God... Quentin Le sam. 5 févr. 2022, 20:51, Terren Suydam a écrit : > > > On Fri,

Re: NYTimes.com: A.I. Predicts the Shapes of Molecules to Come

Le dim. 25 juil. 2021 à 23:38, John Clark a écrit : > On Sun, Jul 25, 2021 at 4:44 PM 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List < > everything-list@googlegroups.com> wrote: > > *> And you have no way of knowing what it will feel like to be John K >> Clark tomorrow, but you have a pretty good theory

Re: Parallel Worlds Probably Exist. Here’s Why

Le dim. 7 févr. 2021 à 14:43, Alan Grayson a écrit : > > > On Sunday, February 7, 2021 at 4:42:26 AM UTC-7 johnk...@gmail.com wrote: > >> On Sun, Feb 7, 2021 at 2:29 AM Alan Grayson wrote: >> >> *> At around 5:15 he makes the fundamental error IMO in describing >>> superposition; namely, that a

Re: Born's rule from almost nothing

Le mer. 27 janv. 2021 à 16:04, Alan Grayson a écrit : > > > On Wednesday, January 27, 2021 at 6:26:50 AM UTC-7 Quentin Anciaux wrote: > >> Le mer. 27 janv. 2021 à 13:38, Alan Grayson a >> écrit : >> >>> >>> >>> On Wednesday, J

Re: Born's rule from almost nothing

Le mer. 27 janv. 2021 à 13:38, Alan Grayson a écrit : > > > On Wednesday, January 27, 2021 at 5:14:33 AM UTC-7 Quentin Anciaux wrote: > >> >> >> Le mer. 27 janv. 2021 à 12:19, Alan Grayson a >> écrit : >> >>> >>> >>> On

Re: Born's rule from almost nothing

Le mer. 27 janv. 2021 à 12:19, Alan Grayson a écrit : > > > On Wednesday, January 27, 2021 at 3:56:50 AM UTC-7 Quentin Anciaux wrote: > >> >> >> Le mer. 27 janv. 2021 à 11:54, Alan Grayson a >> écrit : >> >>> >>> >&

Re: Born's rule from almost nothing

Le mer. 27 janv. 2021 à 11:54, Alan Grayson a écrit : > > > On Tuesday, January 12, 2021 at 10:19:59 PM UTC-7 Pierz wrote: > >> >> >> On Monday, January 4, 2021 at 12:09:06 PM UTC+11 agrays...@gmail.com >> wrote: >> >>> On Sunday, January 3, 2021 at 3:56:51 PM UTC-7 johnk...@gmail.com wrote: >>>

Re: Born's rule from almost nothing

If the world *split* (or differentiate) it is self obvious, that before the split/differntiation, it's the same world. So if you start at moment t1 with one "world" A... at t2, you have two "worlds" A1 and A2 *each* having A as common past "world" Le mer. 20 janv. 2021 à 08:29, Alan Grayson a

Re: Born's rule from almost nothing

Le dim. 17 janv. 2021 à 12:53, Pierz Newton-John a écrit : > > > On Sun, 17 Jan 2021 at 10:15 pm, Alan Grayson > wrote: > >> >> >> On Saturday, January 16, 2021 at 9:55:50 PM UTC-7 Pierz wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 17 Jan 2021 at 3:10 pm, Alan Grayson >>> wrote: >>> On Saturday,

Re: Born's rule from almost nothing

Obviously I'm blocked by AG for whatever reason, because that's what I've been telling him since and got no answer... I even bother to take the time to make a schematics (well a ugly one but still) :D Le ven. 15 janv. 2021 à 07:36, Pierz Newton-John a écrit : > > > On Fri, 15 Jan 2021 at 4:01

Re: Born's rule from almost nothing

Le jeu. 14 janv. 2021 à 07:21, Quentin Anciaux a écrit : > > > Le jeu. 14 janv. 2021 à 04:42, Alan Grayson a > écrit : > >> >> >> On Wednesday, January 13, 2021 at 8:29:16 PM UTC-7 Pierz wrote: >> >>> On Thursday, January 14, 2021 at

Re: Born's rule from almost nothing

Le jeu. 14 janv. 2021 à 04:42, Alan Grayson a écrit : > > > On Wednesday, January 13, 2021 at 8:29:16 PM UTC-7 Pierz wrote: > >> On Thursday, January 14, 2021 at 1:23:11 PM UTC+11 agrays...@gmail.com >> wrote: >> >>> On Wednesday, January 13, 2021 at 4:33:20 PM UTC-7 Pierz wrote: >>> On

Re: Re[2]: Born's rule from almost nothing

ters? > No Franson interferometers either ... > > -- > Inviato da Libero Mail per Android > Mercoledì, 06 Gennaio 2021, 01:28PM +01:00 da Quentin Anciaux > allco...@gmail.com: > > Here a schema: > [image: image.png] > > After 3 experiments, you have *8* worlds...

Re: Born's rule from almost nothing

There are no this world... Every world is a world with a past. To simplify we will assume with start with one world at t, at t1, we have two worlds, at t2, 4 and so on... Each of these worlds are direct continuation of the unique world at time t, at t3, there is no *this worlds*, every alan in

Re: Born's rule from almost nothing

Here a schema: [image: image.png] After 3 experiments, you have *8* worlds... each with the memory of the initial experiment, 4 of the 2nd version A and for of the 2nd version B... etc Every *worlds* has a past which is linked directly with the previous experiment and to the initial

Re: Probability in Everettian QM

Le mer. 9 sept. 2020 à 09:46, Bruce Kellett a écrit : > On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 5:29 PM Quentin Anciaux wrote: > >> Le mer. 9 sept. 2020 à 09:14, Bruce Kellett a >> écrit : >> >>> On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 4:50 PM 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List < >>

Re: Probability in Everettian QM

Le mer. 9 sept. 2020 à 09:14, Bruce Kellett a écrit : > On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 4:50 PM 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List < > everything-list@googlegroups.com> wrote: > >> On 9/8/2020 10:51 PM, Stathis Papaioannou wrote: >> >> On Wed, 9 Sep 2020 at 14:56, Bruce Kellett wrote: >> >>> >>> Be a

Re: Probability in Everettian QM

ing of numbers of worlds there are an infinity of them always, similar / identical "world" differentiate but there is no increase or decrease, there is no meaningfull way of "counting"... The frequency is all there is. Quentin > > Brent > > On 9/3/2020 12:02 PM, Quentin A

Re: Probability in Everettian QM

Hi, as there will be persons in self duplicate experiment who'll see WWW...WW. But most should converge on 50%. Quentin Le jeu. 3 sept. 2020 à 20:48, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List < everything-list@googlegroups.com> a écrit : > Albert makes an interesting argument against Everettian QM,

Re: Universe as a simulated strange loop

Le lun. 4 mai 2020 à 14:15, Lawrence Crowell < goldenfieldquaterni...@gmail.com> a écrit : > On Sunday, May 3, 2020 at 10:14:10 PM UTC-5, smitra wrote: >> >> On 03-05-2020 23:09, Philip Thrift wrote: >> > The SSH >> > >> > https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/22/2/247 >> > >> > still lies in the

Re: Inflation and the total size of the universe

Le jeu. 16 avr. 2020 à 03:43, Alan Grayson a écrit : > > > On Wednesday, April 15, 2020 at 7:25:50 AM UTC-6, John Clark wrote: >> >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 4:27 PM Alan Grayson wrote: >> >> *> If you solve Schroedinger's equation for the wf, you get a solution >>> for all space and time.

Re: Inflation and the total size of the universe

Le mar. 14 avr. 2020 à 16:20, Quentin Anciaux a écrit : > > > Le mar. 14 avr. 2020 à 16:14, Alan Grayson a > écrit : > >> >> >> On Tuesday, April 14, 2020 at 7:54:19 AM UTC-6, Alan Grayson wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tuesday, A

Re: Inflation and the total size of the universe

Le mar. 14 avr. 2020 à 16:14, Alan Grayson a écrit : > > > On Tuesday, April 14, 2020 at 7:54:19 AM UTC-6, Alan Grayson wrote: >> >> >> >> On Tuesday, April 14, 2020 at 5:28:07 AM UTC-6, John Clark wrote: >>> >>> On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 5:11 PM Alan Grayson >>> wrote: >>> >>> *>>> if you accept

Re: Postulate: Everything that CAN happen, MUST happen.

Le sam. 29 févr. 2020 à 06:35, Alan Grayson a écrit : > > > On Thursday, February 27, 2020 at 5:41:57 AM UTC-7, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> >> >> On 26 Feb 2020, at 18:06, Alan Grayson wrote: >> >> >> >> On Wednesday, February 26, 2020 at 4:35:54 AM UTC-7, Bruno Marchal wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 25 Feb

Re: Postulate: Everything that CAN happen, MUST happen.

Le ven. 21 févr. 2020 à 14:04, Alan Grayson a écrit : > > > On Friday, February 21, 2020 at 3:41:29 AM UTC-7, Bruce wrote: >> >> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 9:30 PM Bruno Marchal wrote: >> >>> On 21 Feb 2020, at 04:40, Bruce Kellett wrote: >>> >>> From: Brent Meeker >>> >>> Of course that's true.

Re: MWI and Born's rule / Bruce

Le mer. 19 févr. 2020 à 10:18, Alan Grayson a écrit : > > > On Wednesday, February 19, 2020 at 12:35:28 AM UTC-7, Quentin Anciaux > wrote: >> >> >> >> Le mer. 19 févr. 2020 à 08:30, Alan Grayson a >> écrit : >> >>> >>> >>

Re: MWI and Born's rule / Bruce

Le mer. 19 févr. 2020 à 08:30, Alan Grayson a écrit : > > > On Wednesday, February 19, 2020 at 12:10:54 AM UTC-7, Quentin Anciaux > wrote: >> >> >> >> Le mer. 19 févr. 2020 à 08:03, Quentin Anciaux a >> écrit : >> >>> >>

Re: MWI and Born's rule / Bruce

Le mer. 19 févr. 2020 à 08:03, Quentin Anciaux a écrit : > > > Le mer. 19 févr. 2020 à 07:36, Alan Grayson a > écrit : > >> >> >> On Tuesday, February 18, 2020 at 11:25:59 PM UTC-7, Quentin Anciaux wrote: >>> >>> >>>

Re: MWI and Born's rule / Bruce

Le mer. 19 févr. 2020 à 07:36, Alan Grayson a écrit : > > > On Tuesday, February 18, 2020 at 11:25:59 PM UTC-7, Quentin Anciaux wrote: >> >> >> >> Le mer. 19 févr. 2020 à 01:24, Alan Grayson a >> écrit : >> >>> >>> >>>

Re: MWI and Born's rule / Bruce

Le mer. 19 févr. 2020 à 01:24, Alan Grayson a écrit : > > > On Tuesday, February 18, 2020 at 4:13:03 PM UTC-7, Quentin Anciaux wrote: >> >> >> >> Le mar. 18 févr. 2020 à 23:36, Alan Grayson a >> écrit : >> >>> >>> >>>

Re: MWI and Born's rule / Bruce

Le mar. 18 févr. 2020 à 23:36, Alan Grayson a écrit : > > > On Tuesday, February 18, 2020 at 3:07:07 PM UTC-7, Quentin Anciaux wrote: >> >> >> >> Le mar. 18 févr. 2020 à 22:54, Alan Grayson a >> écrit : >> >>> >>> >>>

Re: MWI and Born's rule / Bruce

Le mar. 18 févr. 2020 à 22:54, Alan Grayson a écrit : > > > On Tuesday, February 18, 2020 at 2:22:46 PM UTC-7, Quentin Anciaux wrote: >> >> >> >> Le mar. 18 févr. 2020 à 22:15, Alan Grayson a >> écrit : >> >>> >>> >>>

Re: MWI and Born's rule / Bruce

Le mar. 18 févr. 2020 à 22:15, Alan Grayson a écrit : > > > On Tuesday, February 18, 2020 at 1:17:59 PM UTC-7, Quentin Anciaux wrote: >> >> >> >> Le mar. 18 févr. 2020 à 16:43, Alan Grayson a >> écrit : >> >>> >>> >>>

Re: MWI and Born's rule / Bruce

Le mar. 18 févr. 2020 à 16:43, Alan Grayson a écrit : > > > On Tuesday, February 18, 2020 at 6:59:11 AM UTC-7, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> >> >> On 18 Feb 2020, at 07:28, Alan Grayson wrote: >> >> >> >> On Monday, February 17, 2020 at 6:21:47 AM UTC-7, Bruno Marchal wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 16 Feb

Re: Postulate: Everything that CAN happen, MUST happen.

Le ven. 14 févr. 2020 à 22:57, Bruce Kellett a écrit : > On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 8:50 AM Quentin Anciaux > wrote: > >> Le ven. 14 févr. 2020 à 22:48, Bruce Kellett a >> écrit : >> >>> On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 1:35 AM Bruno Marchal wrote: >>> >>

Re: Postulate: Everything that CAN happen, MUST happen.

Le ven. 14 févr. 2020 à 22:48, Bruce Kellett a écrit : > On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 1:35 AM Bruno Marchal wrote: > >> >> Just to be clear, are you OK with P(W) = 1/2 in the WM-duplicatipon, when >> “W” refers to the first person experience? >> > > No. As I have said before, the H-man has no basis

Re: Unhappiness with the universe

Le mar. 21 janv. 2020 à 08:44, Alan Grayson a écrit : > > > On Tuesday, January 21, 2020 at 12:33:26 AM UTC-7, Quentin Anciaux wrote: >> >> >> >> Le mar. 21 janv. 2020 à 08:29, Alan Grayson a >> écrit : >> >>> >>> >

Re: Unhappiness with the universe

Le mar. 21 janv. 2020 à 08:29, Alan Grayson a écrit : > > > On Tuesday, January 21, 2020 at 12:00:22 AM UTC-7, Brent wrote: >> >> >> >> On 1/20/2020 10:09 PM, Alan Grayson wrote: >> >> >> *Maybe I can summarize it this way; if it had a beginning, which I will >> label as T = 0, and was finite in

Re: Unhappiness with the universe

Le lun. 20 janv. 2020 à 23:14, Alan Grayson a écrit : > > > On Monday, January 20, 2020 at 2:59:30 PM UTC-7, Quentin Anciaux wrote: >> >> >> >> Le lun. 20 janv. 2020 à 22:56, Alan Grayson a >> écrit : >> >>> >>> &

Re: Unhappiness with the universe

Le lun. 20 janv. 2020 à 22:56, Alan Grayson a écrit : > > > On Monday, January 20, 2020 at 2:00:36 PM UTC-7, Brent wrote: >> >> >> >> On 1/20/2020 5:10 AM, Alan Grayson wrote: >> >> I explained it several times. There's a singularity implied if it had a >> start AND was infinite. If it's

Re: Unhappiness with the universe

Le lun. 20 janv. 2020 à 22:45, Alan Grayson a écrit : > > > On Monday, January 20, 2020 at 6:25:29 AM UTC-7, Quentin Anciaux wrote: >> >> >> >> Le lun. 20 janv. 2020 à 14:10, Alan Grayson a >> écrit : >> >>> >>> >>>

Re: Unhappiness with the universe

Le lun. 20 janv. 2020 à 14:10, Alan Grayson a écrit : > > > On Monday, January 20, 2020 at 6:04:38 AM UTC-7, Quentin Anciaux wrote: >> >> >> >> Le lun. 20 janv. 2020 à 13:49, Alan Grayson a >> écrit : >> >>> >>> >>

Re: Unhappiness with the universe

Le lun. 20 janv. 2020 à 13:49, Alan Grayson a écrit : > > > On Monday, January 20, 2020 at 3:30:19 AM UTC-7, Alan Grayson wrote: >> >> >> >> On Monday, January 20, 2020 at 3:02:51 AM UTC-7, Philip Thrift wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Monday, January 20, 2020 at 2:31:42 AM UTC-6, Alan Grayson wrote:

Re: Unhappiness with the universe

Le mar. 14 janv. 2020 à 12:47, Alan Grayson a écrit : > > > On Tuesday, January 14, 2020 at 4:04:27 AM UTC-7, Bruce wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 9:30 PM Alan Grayson wrote: >> >>> On Tuesday, January 14, 2020 at 3:06:48 AM UTC-7, John Clark wrote: On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 9:03

Re: Unhappiness with the universe

Le lun. 13 janv. 2020 à 14:41, Alan Grayson a écrit : > > > On Monday, January 13, 2020 at 6:24:00 AM UTC-7, John Clark wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 8:13 AM Alan Grayson wrote: >> >> *> the winking out is purely a geometric effect of the expansion.* >> >> >> I have no idea what you mean

Re: Unhappiness with the universe

Le lun. 13 janv. 2020 à 11:21, Alan Grayson a écrit : > > > On Monday, January 13, 2020 at 3:13:57 AM UTC-7, Quentin Anciaux wrote: >> >> >> >> Le lun. 13 janv. 2020 à 11:10, Alan Grayson a >> écrit : >> >>> >>> >>>

Re: Unhappiness with the universe

Le lun. 13 janv. 2020 à 11:10, Alan Grayson a écrit : > > > On Monday, January 13, 2020 at 2:54:48 AM UTC-7, Quentin Anciaux wrote: >> >> >> >> Le lun. 13 janv. 2020 à 10:50, Alan Grayson a >> écrit : >> >>> >>> >>>

Re: Unhappiness with the universe

Le lun. 13 janv. 2020 à 10:50, Alan Grayson a écrit : > > > On Monday, January 13, 2020 at 2:38:57 AM UTC-7, Quentin Anciaux wrote: >> >> >> >> Le lun. 13 janv. 2020 à 10:28, Alan Grayson a >> écrit : >> >>> >>> >

Re: Unhappiness with the universe

Le lun. 13 janv. 2020 à 10:28, Alan Grayson a écrit : > > > On Monday, January 13, 2020 at 1:33:01 AM UTC-7, stathisp wrote: >> >> >> >> On Mon, 13 Jan 2020 at 13:48, Alan Grayson wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Sunday, January 12, 2020 at 8:58:06 AM UTC-7, John Clark wrote: On Thu, Jan 2,

Re: Superdeterminism in comics

Le mar. 17 déc. 2019 à 21:00, John Clark a écrit : > On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 12:23 PM Quentin Anciaux > wrote: > > >> I can accept the fact that you are going to be duplicated but that >>> will not change your expectations. And perhaps your expectation is to see

Re: Superdeterminism in comics

Le mar. 17 déc. 2019 à 17:49, John Clark a écrit : > > On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 11:32 AM Quentin Anciaux > wrote: > > > *i'm as able to talk about my future expectations as I am now, >> duplication or not change absolutely nothing about that,* > > > OK I have n

Re: Superdeterminism in comics

Le mar. 17 déc. 2019 à 17:18, John Clark a écrit : > On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 7:47 AM Quentin Anciaux > wrote: > > > *John Clark is not human and* [...] >> > > I think your obvious rage and frustration comes from the fact that you are > unable to coherently express

Re: Superdeterminism in comics

Le mar. 17 déc. 2019 à 12:55, John Clark a écrit : > On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 10:35 PM 'Brent Meeker' < > everything-list@googlegroups.com> wrote: > > >> *> Expecting what you will experience after pushing the button must refer >> to thoughts before the button is pushed, so "you" must refer to

Re: Superdeterminism in comics

Le mar. 17 déc. 2019 à 04:54, Bruce Kellett a écrit : > On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 2:35 PM 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List < > everything-list@googlegroups.com> wrote: > >> On 12/16/2019 6:31 PM, John Clark wrote: >> >> On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at

Re: Superdeterminism in comics

Le lun. 16 déc. 2019 à 23:22, John Clark a écrit : > > > On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 10:16 AM Bruno Marchal wrote: > > >> Yes indeed, Mr.He knows who he is, Mr.He knows he is the man who saw W >>> and also knows that the man who sees W is the W man, and both those things >>> could be predicted long

Re: Superdeterminism in comics

Le jeu. 28 nov. 2019 à 15:50, John Clark a écrit : > > On Thu, Nov 28, 2019 at 8:14 AM Bruno Marchal wrote: > > >> Then what one and only one city do "you" personally feel to be in? >> >> > > > *In the third person view on the first person view, you can say *[...] >> > > What about the first

Re: Sean Carroll's Google talk about his book

Le jeu. 10 oct. 2019 à 11:30, Philip Thrift a écrit : > > > On Thursday, October 10, 2019 at 2:40:53 AM UTC-5, Quentin Anciaux wrote: >> >> >> >> Le jeu. 10 oct. 2019 à 09:34, Philip Thrift a >> écrit : >> >>> >>> >>

Re: Sean Carroll's Google talk about his book

Le jeu. 10 oct. 2019 à 09:34, Philip Thrift a écrit : > > > On Wednesday, October 9, 2019 at 3:59:50 PM UTC-5, John Clark wrote: >> >> On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 4:55 PM Philip Thrift wrote: >> >> *> Other interpretations (but not MWI, as far as I can see) are used in >>> writing programs for

Re: Sean Carroll's new book

Le ven. 27 sept. 2019 à 08:41, Philip Thrift a écrit : > > > On Thursday, September 26, 2019 at 7:01:19 PM UTC-5, Lawrence Crowell > wrote: >> >> On Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 6:54:59 AM UTC-5, John Clark wrote: >>> >>> It seems that nearly everyone on the list has a strong opinion >>>

Re: Sean Carroll: Universe a 'tiny sliver' of all there is

Le jeu. 26 sept. 2019 à 14:39, Stathis Papaioannou a écrit : > > > On Thu, 26 Sep 2019 at 11:48, Philip Thrift wrote: > >> >> >> On Thursday, September 26, 2019 at 4:30:01 AM UTC-5, stathisp wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, 26 Sep 2019 at 09:41, Philip Thrift wrote: >>> On

Re: Sean Carroll: Universe a 'tiny sliver' of all there is

Le jeu. 26 sept. 2019 à 09:41, Philip Thrift a écrit : > > > On Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 7:32:39 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote: >> >> >> >> On 9/25/2019 8:28 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> >> >> On 24 Sep 2019, at 17:44, Philip Thrift wrote: >> >> >> >> On Tuesday, September 24, 2019 at 6:23:10 AM

Re: Many Worlds morality

Le mer. 25 sept. 2019 à 14:52, Philip Thrift a écrit : > > > On Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 6:01:24 AM UTC-5, Quentin Anciaux > wrote: >> >> >> >> Le mer. 25 sept. 2019 à 12:57, Philip Thrift a >> écrit : >> >>> >>> >>

Re: Many Worlds morality

Le mer. 25 sept. 2019 à 12:57, Philip Thrift a écrit : > > > On Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 5:51:59 AM UTC-5, Quentin Anciaux > wrote: >> >> >> >> saying ontology metaphysics is bullshit >> > > > > I said ontologies *without applicat

Re: Many Worlds morality

roup Nazi. > > @philipthrift > > On Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 3:26:01 AM UTC-5, Quentin Anciaux > wrote: >> >> http://www.weidai.com/everything.html >> >> Le mer. 25 sept. 2019 à 10:24, Quentin Anciaux a >> écrit : >> >>&

Re: Many Worlds morality

Well now the insults... Okay. Le mer. 25 sept. 2019 à 11:49, Philip Thrift a écrit : > > > On Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 3:24:18 AM UTC-5, Quentin Anciaux > wrote: >> >> >> >> Le mer. 25 sept. 2019 à 10:21, Philip Thrift a >> écrit : >> &

Re: Many Worlds morality

http://www.weidai.com/everything.html Le mer. 25 sept. 2019 à 10:24, Quentin Anciaux a écrit : > > > Le mer. 25 sept. 2019 à 10:21, Philip Thrift a > écrit : > >> >> >> On Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 3:00:52 AM UTC-5, Quentin Anciaux >> wrote: >&g

Re: Many Worlds morality

Le mer. 25 sept. 2019 à 10:21, Philip Thrift a écrit : > > > On Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 3:00:52 AM UTC-5, Quentin Anciaux > wrote: >> >> >> >> Le mer. 25 sept. 2019 à 09:55, Philip Thrift a >> écrit : >> >>> >>> >&g

Re: Many Worlds morality

Le mer. 25 sept. 2019 à 09:55, Philip Thrift a écrit : > > > On Wednesday, September 25, 2019 at 1:25:58 AM UTC-5, stathisp wrote: >> >> >> >> On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 at 08:16, Philip Thrift wrote: >> >>> >>> Many Worlds leads Sean Carroll to speculate about the morality of >>> duplicated selves

Re: Quantum Supremacy

Le lun. 23 sept. 2019 à 15:23, John Clark a écrit : > On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 7:42 AM Bruno Marchal wrote: > > *> Mathematically, it is still an open problem if a quantum computer >> really speed-up the computations, but like with P = NP, most experts have >> few doubt that this is the case.* >

Re: Another physicist in mental decline (Sean Carroll)

Le jeu. 19 sept. 2019 à 15:37, Alan Grayson a écrit : > > > On Thursday, September 19, 2019 at 5:02:11 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> >> >> On 16 Sep 2019, at 17:18, Alan Grayson wrote: >> >> >> >> On Monday, September 16, 2019 at 9:00:46 AM UTC-6, Bruno Marchal wrote: >>> >>> >>> On 14 Sep

Re: Quantum immortality

Le ven. 13 sept. 2019 à 13:21, Bruce Kellett a écrit : > On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 9:18 PM Quentin Anciaux > wrote: > >> Le ven. 13 sept. 2019 à 13:16, Bruce Kellett a >> écrit : >> >>> >>> I don't get Mallah's point here, either. I will have to loo

Re: Quantum immortality

Le ven. 13 sept. 2019 à 13:16, Bruce Kellett a écrit : > On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 8:49 PM Bruno Marchal wrote: > >> On 12 Sep 2019, at 01:50, Bruce Kellett wrote: >> >> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 1:55 AM Bruno Marchal wrote: >> >>> On 11 Sep 2019, at 01:30, Bruce Kellett >>> wrote: >>> >>> From:

Re: Quantum immortality

Le ven. 13 sept. 2019 à 08:03, Bruce Kellett a écrit : > On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 3:07 PM 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List < > everything-list@googlegroups.com> wrote: > >> On 9/12/2019 9:49 PM, Bruce Kellett wrote: >> >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 1:41 PM Stathis Papaioannou >> wrote: >> >>> On

Re: Quantum immortality

Le mer. 11 sept. 2019 à 14:08, Quentin Anciaux a écrit : > > > Le mer. 11 sept. 2019 à 14:01, Bruce Kellett a > écrit : > >> On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 4:57 PM Quentin Anciaux >> wrote: >> >>> The argument of the measure is based on ASSA and that's wh

Re: Quantum immortality

Le mer. 11 sept. 2019 à 14:01, Bruce Kellett a écrit : > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 4:57 PM Quentin Anciaux > wrote: > >> The argument of the measure is based on ASSA and that's why it is flawed, >> moments are not random sampled from all possible moments, with this >> a

Re: Quantum immortality

The argument of the measure is based on ASSA and that's why it is flawed, moments are not random sampled from all possible moments, with this argument and without QI, you should have never find yourself young... But somewhere just before your death. Quentin Le mer. 11 sept. 2019 à 08:43, Bruce

Re: Observation versus assumption

Le mer. 24 juil. 2019 à 21:57, John Clark a écrit : > On 23 Jul 2019, at 20:16, Philip Thrift wrote: > > *> In 1972, Washington University professors Wesley Clark and Bob Arnzen >> likely made the first physical version of Turing's machine.* > > > I think that estimate is off by at least

Re: subjective experience

Le dim. 21 juil. 2019 à 20:18, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List < everything-list@googlegroups.com> a écrit : > > > On 7/21/2019 1:09 AM, Quentin Anciaux wrote: > > I didn't say there was. I said *youse-self* sees Moscow and Washington. >> "Youse-self" i

Re: subjective experience

Le dim. 21 juil. 2019 à 08:28, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List < everything-list@googlegroups.com> a écrit : > > > On 7/20/2019 11:16 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote: > > > > Le dim. 21 juil. 2019 à 08:12, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List < > everythi

Re: subjective experience

Le dim. 21 juil. 2019 à 08:16, Quentin Anciaux a écrit : > > > Le dim. 21 juil. 2019 à 08:12, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List < > everything-list@googlegroups.com> a écrit : > >> >> >> On 7/20/2019 10:59 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote: >> >> >

Re: subjective experience

Le dim. 21 juil. 2019 à 08:12, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List < everything-list@googlegroups.com> a écrit : > > > On 7/20/2019 10:59 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote: > > > > Le dim. 21 juil. 2019 à 02:34, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List < > everythi

Re: subjective experience

Le dim. 21 juil. 2019 à 02:34, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List < everything-list@googlegroups.com> a écrit : > > > On 7/20/2019 1:32 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote: > > > > Le sam. 20 juil. 2019 à 22:27, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List < > everythi

Re: subjective experience

Le sam. 20 juil. 2019 à 22:27, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List < everything-list@googlegroups.com> a écrit : > > > On 7/20/2019 3:16 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > Why? You will push on a button. You assume mechanism, so you know you > > will not die, and you know that with mechanism, you cannot

Re: Observation versus assumption

Le ven. 19 juil. 2019 à 14:45, Philip Thrift a écrit : > > > On Friday, July 19, 2019 at 6:31:53 AM UTC-5, Quentin Anciaux wrote: >> >> >> >> Le ven. 19 juil. 2019 à 13:02, Philip Thrift a >> écrit : >> >>> >>> >>

Re: Observation versus assumption

Le ven. 19 juil. 2019 à 13:02, Philip Thrift a écrit : > > > On Friday, July 19, 2019 at 5:50:11 AM UTC-5, Quentin Anciaux wrote: >> >> >> >> Le ven. 19 juil. 2019 à 12:18, Philip Thrift a >> écrit : >> >>> >>>

Re: Observation versus assumption

Le ven. 19 juil. 2019 à 12:18, Philip Thrift a écrit : > > > On Friday, July 19, 2019 at 3:52:05 AM UTC-5, telmo wrote: >> >> >> >> ... >> You insist that nobody has been able to produce a computer without using >> matter. I agree. What you refuse to consider is the possibility that matter >> is

Re: subjective experience

Le mer. 17 juil. 2019 à 00:37, Bruce Kellett a écrit : > On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 12:55 AM Bruno Marchal wrote: > >> On 16 Jul 2019, at 13:44, PGC wrote: >> >> On Monday, July 15, 2019 at 1:53:11 PM UTC+2, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> >>> >>> I don’t understand well what you say. >>> >> >> Nobody,

Re: Artist and Picture by J.W. Dunne

. > > > On Friday, July 12, 2019 at 3:28:59 AM UTC-5, Quentin Anciaux wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Is it not how evolution is working ? By iteration and random >> modification, new better organisms come to existence ? >> >> Why AI could not use iteratin

Re: Artist and Picture by J.W. Dunne

Hi, Is it not how evolution is working ? By iteration and random modification, new better organisms come to existence ? Why AI could not use iterating evolution to make better and better AI ? Also if *we build* a real AGI, isn't it the same thing ? Wouldn't we have built a better, smarter

Re: The anecdote of Moon landing

t 4:08:29 PM UTC+2, Quentin Anciaux wrote: >> >> I don't know what Bruno did to you,what's the point to always attacking >> him like that and misunderstand on purpose what is written ? >> >> You can keep that for you. >> >> If you have something interesting

Re: The anecdote of Moon landing

The disbelief of moon landing vs telepathy... ;( Le jeu. 4 juil. 2019 à 16:39, John Clark a écrit : > Does anyone know what the title of this thread means? > > John K Clark > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Everything List" group. > To

Re: The anecdote of Moon landing

age... so your younger period seems to have been longer as it is.. Anyway, duration of moments is totally subjective and that's what he meant. Le mer. 3 juil. 2019 à 16:08, Quentin Anciaux a écrit : > I don't know what Bruno did to you,what's the point to always attacking > hi

Re: The anecdote of Moon landing

I don't know what Bruno did to you,what's the point to always attacking him like that and misunderstand on purpose what is written ? You can keep that for you. If you have something interesting to say, say it, if it's only for insulting don't bother posting... those king of insulting emails are

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >