Roger,
I liked your 1p think therefore 1p am
But your statement below, although correct , is much too vague.
Quantum mechanics is not understood because it is not complete.
Feynman came close to completing it but still missed an essential property.
That property is that the quantum mind has
...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Richard Ruquist
That sounds fine, except the BEC is not something specific, it is
not a mind or brain, it is matter. I imagine that it condenses in
some container held near 0oC. That condensate could be
considered to be a monad or substance. And it could of course
be conscious
Velmans introduces perceptual projection but this remains as the Hard
Problem in his book, how exactly perceptual projection happens-Evgenii
Rudnyi
I conjecture that the discrete nonphysical particles of compactified space,
the so-called Calabi-Yau Manifolds of string theory, have perceptual
Roger,
According to string theory, the monad or Calabi-Yau compact particles are
hardware.
Richard
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Roger rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
BRUNO: I meant that some fixed hardware computer can emulate a virtual
self-modifying version of itself, so that your point
Roger,
In string theory the monads are responsible for the creation of space via
compactification of the extra dimensions of space. I have never understood
why, especially on the Mind/Brain forum where we already went thru all of
you present thinking, why you never accepted the compact manifolds
Roger,
It is the compactified dimensions that are the monads, not the strings.
Obviously you did not read and /or understand all I have been telling you.
Richard
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 12:12 PM, Roger rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Richard Ruquist
1) The is no master string to govern
Roger,
Divine selection and natural selection are sourced,
however at differing levels of information integration,
in the universal CYM monad subspace.
Belief can also be a product of science.
I believe science.
Richard
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 5:29 AM, Roger rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi
Wiki: Mereology has been axiomatized in various ways as applications
of predicate
logic http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Predicate_logic to formal
ontologyhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formal_ontology,
of which mereology is an important part. A common element of such
axiomatizations is the assumption,
My belief based on string theory is that monad logic gets applied to
produce the best possible world at the level of quantum particle
interactions where the best of several quantum states is chosen in every
interaction in the universe by the ,monads.
Richard Ruquist PhD
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 6
Hi Stephan,
I do not think that string theory requires a fixed background.
Otherwise string theory could not be a prospective ToE.
Richard
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.netwrote:
On 8/20/2012 11:36 AM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
Wiki: Mereology has been
of COMP is.
They may even be related except for the multiverse aspect of COMP.
Richard
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Richard Ruquist
I also believe in science. But if you're trying to trash religion
with science, science hasn't a clue nor a tool nor
String theory predicts the viscosity of the quark-gluon plasma
already found at the LHC and several other sites.
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.netwrote:
On 8/21/2012 12:19 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 8/21/2012 4:10 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi guys,
Neither
:
On 8/21/2012 3:39 PM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
String theory predicts the viscosity of the quark-gluon plasma
already found at the LHC and several other sites.
Hi Richard,
Could you link some sources on this?
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.netwrote
/2012 3:58 PM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
Steinberg P. Soft Physics from RHIC to the LHC. arXiv:nucl-ex/09031471,
2009.
Kovtum PK, Son DT Starinets AO. Viscosity in Strongly Interacting
Quantum
Field Theories from Black Hole Physics. arXiv:hep-th/0405231.
Good! Now to see if there any any
Baloney. Strings are extended in space. Where did you get that from?
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 4:53 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Stephen P. King
Unlike everyday strings, the strings of string theory are not extended in
space.
The particles they describe, however, are
at 6:14 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Richard Ruquist
Physical law is unextended, while physical objects are extended.
As I understand it, Nature is extended while Supernature is not.
So I could call physical law supernatural.
Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net
8/22/2012
Roger, monads are by definition nonlocal does not mean that space
does not exist. Your logic is faulty.
Richard
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 5:31 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi benjayk
In monadic theory, since space does not exist, monads are by definition
nonlocal, thus all
. King stephe...@charter.net
*Receiver:* everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
*Time:* 2012-08-21, 08:11:08
*Subject:* Re: How Leibniz solved the mind-body problem
On 8/21/2012 8:07 AM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
Roger,
According to string theory the monads do not only see
of the circle was mapped in a r-1/r mapping to its interior
so that the center of the circle integrated all information at r=infinity.
I expect that someday the 3-D problem will be solved.
Richard Ruquist
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 8:53 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Richard
Roger,
Space is not empty. It is full of monads at 10^90/cc.
These are the building blocks of space in integration-information theory.
Richard
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Richard Ruquist
You need to study the monadology. And the history
.
Jason
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.comwrote:
Stephan,
I solved the landscape problem by assuming that each monad was distinct
consistent with the astronomical observations that the hyperfine constant
varied monotonically across the universe.
Richard
No Roger,
Take f=ma. M is a physical entity for sure. F is often taken to be physical
as well,
Strings are both particles of force and mass. QED
Richard
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 8:38 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Richard Ruquist
I think the problem is with the word strings
That there are 10^500 possible configurations of the monads.
Scientist believe that each possible universe
contains but one kind of monad..
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Richard Ruquist
What is the landscape problem ?
Roger Clough, rclo
Of course theories are not the physical entities.
But the laws of physics are a good approximation
of how the universe works
and string theory just says
where they come from.
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 9:31 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Richard Ruquist
Yes, theories REFER
Don't be silly.
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Richard Ruquist
Is F = Ma one of the fundamental particles ? What's it look like ?
Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net
8/22/2012
Leibniz would say, If there's no God, we'd have to invent him so
reflecting monads have. This allows us to use Greene's r - 1/r
duality and the Stone duality as well. ;-)
On 8/22/2012 9:15 AM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
Yes Stephan,
The 10^500 possible windings of flux constraining the compactified
dimensions
are sufficient to populate some 10^120 universes
, Richard Ruquist wrote:
That there are 10^500 possible configurations of the monads.
Scientist believe that each possible universe
contains but one kind of monad..
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Richard Ruquist
What is the landscape problem
view defined. Within the Monadology all concepts
that imply an outside view are strictly defined in terms of appearances
from the inside.
On 8/22/2012 9:09 AM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
Roger,
Space is not empty. It is full of monads at 10^90/cc.
These are the building blocks of space
Roger,
Apology accepted, except that the behavior of the tiny strings
is considered to predict the behavior of the particles of the Standard
Model.
Richard
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:14 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Richard,
Now I see the error in my thinking. Or maybe it
Stephan,
Many thanks for this wonderful paper by Vaugh Pratt
http://boole.stanford.edu/pub/ratmech.pdf
Pratt theory appears to replace Godellian theory.
But Godellian theory manifests consciousness, so some think.
And Pratt theory seems to apply to the interaction of physical particles
with each
Stephan,
Thanks for telling me what bisimulation means.
I was interested in that choosing only one state at a time eliminates the
multiverse.
Richard
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:38 PM, Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.netwrote:
On 8/22/2012 4:04 PM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
Now
in terms of appearances from
the inside.
On 8/22/2012 9:09 AM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
Roger,
Space is not empty. It is full of monads at 10^90/cc.
These are the building blocks of space in integration-information theory.
Richard
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net
as the
collection or pool or menu of prior possible states that are selected from.
What is interesting about Pratt's idea is that in the case of the finite
and forgetful residuation the menu itself is not constant, it gets selected
as well.
On 8/23/2012 6:45 AM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
Stephan
that we get something consistent
with GR.
On 8/23/2012 7:32 AM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
Stephan,
Agreed. All possible states are present in the mind,
but IMO only one state gets to be physical at any one time,
exactly what Pratt seems to be saying.
That's why I called it an axiom
Stephan,
Is not the method of Godel sufficient to define a consciousness
although the last step to consciousness is a leap of faith?
Richard
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 8:24 AM, Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.netwrote:
Hi Richard,
On 8/23/2012 8:01 AM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
Stephan
proved,
provides the basis for emergence.
Now if only someone could explain how emergence works.
Can Pratt theory do that?
Richard
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Richard Ruquist
Godelian theory may or may not explain or pertain to consciousness
everything-list@googlegroups.com
*Time:* 2012-08-23, 09:35:17
*Subject:* Re: Pratt theory
Hi Richard Ruquist
Godelian theory may or may not explain or pertain to consciousness,
but it is not consciousness itself. One can be conscious of an iidea,
but ideas are the contents of consciouness
How do you know that?
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 10:27 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Richard Ruquist
Monads are simply a smart bunch of ASCII characters.
Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net
8/23/2012
Leibniz would say, If there's no God, we'd have to invent him so
everything
-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
*Time:* 2012-08-22, 11:24:16
*Subject:* Re: Leibniz's theodicy: a nonlocal and hopefully best mereology
What exactly determines the 10^500 number?
On 8/22/2012 9:19 AM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
That there are 10^500 possible configurations of the monads
an abstract category that we assign. It is a name.
On 8/23/2012 9:44 AM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
Now if only someone could explain how emergence works.
Can Pratt theory do that?
--
Onward!
Stephen
Nature, to be commanded, must be obeyed.
~ Francis Bacon
--
You received this message
, 2012 at 12:49 PM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Richard Ruquist
Yes, I try to preach Leibniz chapter and verse.
I'm still waiting for critical thinking from you.
Whatever is in spacetime, such as a string, is extended.
Monads aree inextended.
I try not to dabble with string
Don't be silly with me
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Richard Ruquist
No leap of faith is needed for consciousness.
All you have to do is open your eyes.
Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net
8/23/2012
Leibniz would say, If there's no God, we'd
I know and that's not science
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Richard Ruquist
My version of Leibniz is not my creation, I try
to follow him as closely as I can.
Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net
8/23/2012
Leibniz would say, If there's no God
? Are you considering how meta-theory Y can prove statements
in a theory X where X /subtheory of Y?
On 8/23/2012 9:24 AM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
Stephan,
Is not the method of Godel sufficient to define a consciousness
although the last step to consciousness is a leap of faith?
Richard
Millions of times cause it just ain't true.
But I do not want to interfere with your religion
In string theory monads are definitely things in themselves.
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:43 PM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Richard Ruquist
Monads are reference to things, are like
More religion
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
The Supreme monad is necessary because it is necessary.
It is the only monad that can perceive and act. The other monads
are linked to it but passive and have no windows (are bllnd) .
Thus the supreme
:10 PM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
It is said that strong emergence comes from Godel incompleteness.
Weak emergence is like your grains of sand.
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:48 PM, Stephen P. King
stephe...@charter.netwrote:
Hi Richard,
Pratt's theory does not address this. Could emergence
The waveform is subjective as it represents a particular quantum state.
In COMP terms it is 3p. But comp people may not think of it as subjective
since every quantum state is realized and therefore all quanta are
objective.
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Stephan,
Thanks for the compliment.
I finally got someone with smarts to read it other than Chalmers and S_T
Yau.
Time inflates along with 3 dimensions in the big bang.
Leaving 6 dimensions behind to compactify or curl up
into tiny balls 1000 planck lengths across each with 500 holes.
So each
Jesse,
This is what Chalmers says in the 95 paper you link about the second
Penrose argument, the one in my paper:
3.5 As far as I can determine, this argument is free of the obvious flaws
that plague other Gödelian arguments, such as Lucas's argument and
Penrose's earlier arguments. If it is
My apologies. When Chalmers used the words godelian argument I thought he
was referring to Godel. Now I can see I misread it.
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 9:09 PM, Jesse Mazer laserma...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 8:41 PM, Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.comwrote:
Jesse
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.netwrote:
On 8/23/2012 8:07 PM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
Stephan,
Thanks for the compliment.
I finally got someone with smarts to read it other than Chalmers and S_T
Yau.
Dear Richard,
You are most welcome. I have
Stephan,
I find it interesting that according to my Roman Catholic professor
theologian friend,
God has intention but but intelligence. That would seem to be consistent
with what you say below. I'll have to ask him if the church came to that
viewpoint do to the ordinary problem of solipsism.
Hi Roger,
Then my friend is either blasphemous or the church has evolved since then.
Recent history of the church suggests that it evolves but rather
conservatively.
Richard
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Richard Ruquist
According to Aquinas. God
Roger,
If the mind were not extended,
then animal intelligence would not depend on brain size.
Richard
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 8:39 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
It has been asked here-- what in fact is the mind-body problem ?
Is it true that real numbers are complete?
Richard
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 27 Aug 2012, at 11:47, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
Please don´t take my self confident style for absolute certainty. I just
expose my ideas for discussion.
The
Hence, both are extended. QED
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Richard Ruquist
The more brain, the more mind.
Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net
8/27/2012
Leibniz would say, If there's no God, we'd have to invent him so
everything could
CLUB OF SUPPER CLUB http://clubofsc.blogspot.com/
http://clubofsc.blogspot.com/2011/08/my-topic-universal-dovetailer-argument.html
Copied
from white on black backgroundMONDAY, AUGUST 29, 2011
My topic - the Universal Dovetailer Argument
This month I'm breaking with tradition and actually
John: I think those arithmetical values must be implemented in matter to
become operational.
Richard: Agreed, as long as the compactified dimensions of string theory
are a form of matter and I am a crackpot.
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 11:53 AM, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Aug
I am of the opinion that recreational drugs should be the preserve of the
retired folk.
In fact in the USA with so many companies and the govt/military doing
random testing
you may as well wait until retirement.
Richard
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 2:45 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
Roger, Do you think that humans do not function
in accord with pre-ordained hardware and software?
Richard
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 7:31 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
ROGER: Hi Bruno Marchal
I don't agree. Machines must function according to their software and
hardware,
nuanced than most attempts to bullshit people about such
complex things. So, it makes a good read for BS detector.
m
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.comwrote:
I am of the opinion that recreational drugs should be the preserve of the
retired folk.
In fact
Craig,
Is the universe expanding (at an accelerating rate)
because it excretes public entropy (space) as exhaust ?
Richard
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Roger,
Yes, and its indeterminacy and non-computability is only the beginning.
Any
What is DNA if not software?
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Richard Ruquist
Pre-ordained is a religious position
And we aren't controlled by software.
Roger Clough, rclo...@verizon.net
8/29/2012
Leibniz would say, If there's no God, we'd have
Roger,
Have you ever smoked pot.
If not you are not qualified to comment
Richard
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
I don't think morality is either arbitrary, political or public consensus
I think that the good is that which enhances life.
So IMHO
? - if not, don't
pretend to talk about their problems.
6. Have you ever been unemployed, seeking a job ?
if not, do not talk into the problem.
and so on and on.
JM
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.comwrote:
Roger,
Have you ever smoked pot
Roger,
On the contrare, science is a product of the left, more or less, whereas
anti-evolution is a product of the right, more or less. Science is
selfcorrecting and so the left is constantly re-examining its conclusions
whether in science or sociology.
Whereas the right is unable to correct
The monads of string theory each have many parts.
To begin with they have 6 dimensions
constrained by higher-order EM flux
winding through 500 topological holes.
They are definitely extended
being 1000 Planck lengths in diameter
and in an array throughout the universe
at a density of about
Bruno,
In comp, what is the function of god.
My hope is that the function of a god
might be to reduce 3p tp 1p.
Everything else seems to be capable
of running according to algorithms.
Is there anything in comp
that is non-algorithmic?
Richard
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Roger Clough
Roger,
Every natural number is distinct from all others.
So your characterization of them as simple
with no internal parts has to be incorrect.
Leibniz himself says that every monad is distinct:
In a confused way they all strive after [vont a] the infinite, the whole;
but they are limited and
My experience is that canabis
increases my motivation and creativity.
Am I an exception?
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Platonist Guitar Cowboy
multiplecit...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree with those statements. I just found the discussion a bit biased
towards the dangers of Cannabis and lacking
How can monads store information without any internal parts?
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 11:01 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Richard Ruquist
My claim was a bit over simplified.
Although numbers do not have parts,
my thinking was of monads as numbers not
numbers as monads. So
, Richard Ruquist wrote:
Roger,
On the contrare, science is a product of the left, more or less, whereas
anti-evolution is a product of the right, more or less. Science is
selfcorrecting and so the left is constantly re-examining its conclusions
whether in science or sociology.
Whereas
FYI
Our Creator Is A Cosmic Computer Programmer - Says JPL Scientist
3 September, 2012
Share this story:
Share on facebook Share on twitter Share on email Share on print More
Sharing Services
5
Follow us:
MessageToEagle.com - Are we just a computer simulation? Who or what is
the creator? More
I did not write that. I know about the Fermi telescope results
as they falsify Loop Quantum Gravity.
Richard
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 5:08 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 9/3/2012 1:51 PM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
Look at the way the Universe behaves, it's quantized, it's made
What struck me is that the the USERS of wealth in directing the life
of the country.
seem to be exporting jobs overseas and hiding their money there as well.
Richard
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 4:12 PM, John Mikes jami...@gmail.com wrote:
First to Bruno's response to
(R):3) It's also probably why
Don't be silly.
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 8:49 PM, Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.net wrote:
On 9/4/2012 4:23 PM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
What struck me is that the the USERS of wealth in directing the life
of the country.
seem to be exporting jobs overseas and hiding their money
It is immoral to cause a recession that puts many out of work
and subsequently loss of home via foreclosure.
Bank of America is actually giving away
some of the homes they
have foreclosed.
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 11:56 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Richard Ruquist
It is immoral
I think he was just saying that point events do not exist.
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 6:23 PM, Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.net wrote:
Hi Folks,
I started reading the new Maudlin paper Time and the Geometry of the
Universe. I got it and started reading. I stopped dead when I read the
The Roman Catholic Church believes that god has intention but not
intelligence in agreement with Arithemetical Truth and neo-Platonism
concept that self-reference is not possible for god.
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 6:40 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Since Leibniz's metaphysics is
If the digital substitution is at the density of 10^90 pixels per
cubic centimeter,
as found in string theory, then digital substitution is essentially analog.
Richard
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 7:31 AM, benjayk benjamin.jaku...@googlemail.com wrote:
Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 04 Sep 2012, at
but
not complete self-reference?
On 9/6/2012 7:24 AM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
The Roman Catholic Church believes that god has intention but not
intelligence in agreement with Arithemetical Truth and neo-Platonism
concept that self-reference is not possible for god.
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 6:40 AM
...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Richard Ruquist
Aquinas, being the truth, cannot be superceded.
I don't know anything about catholic fundamentalist churches,
but am suspicious that that's just a fantasy.
The supreme monad is a critical feature without
which we would remain blind and paralyzed.
You need
But Roger, capitalism can go both ways
as witnessed by the Great depression
and the Great Recession.
Richard
On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 6:35 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi John Mikes
Here's the dilemma:
Unfortunately, any system -- with the exception of the oil-rich countries
FYI
-- Forwarded message --
From: richard ruquist yann...@yahoo.com
Date: Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 11:10 AM
Subject: Fw: the physics arXiv blog
To: yann...@gmail.com yann...@gmail.com
- Forwarded Message -
*From:* Technology Review Feed - arXiv blog ho...@arxivblog.com
The current USA space-based ICBM defense system (on paper) consists of
autonomous kill vehicles separately orbiting the earth (10,000 of
them). Each KV decides if an *ICBM has launched and they divert from
orbit to hit the ICBM before burn-out. Canavan and Teller in vented
that system in
When I read this I thought of you all.
Richard
-- Forwarded message --
From: Anna panth...@mail.com
Date: Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 11:01 PM
Subject: [4DWorldx] thanks to Moon I found this creazy story about head
transplants
To: 4dwor...@yahoogroups.com
**
Friday, 6 April, 2001,
Hi Roger,
Thank you for the link to Steve Wolfram's new book.
What he says in the first few pages is that his new science
does away with the need for an all-powerful supernatural being.
However, it does appear that his new science has application to
Leibniz's monads as well as the monads of
May not be of interest,
but the Reform branch on Judaism has a prayer for Doubt in their
High Holiday services.
That may be one reason why some have become such good scientists.
Richard
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 09 Sep 2012, at 13:50, Roger
The late Chris Lofting turned I Ching into a science and even was able
to derive Quantum Mechanics from it, at least what he considered to be
QM.
http://www.emotionaliching.com/myweb/newindex.html
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.net wrote:
On 9/14/2012 8:40
Most people prefer working to looking for work.
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday, September 14, 2012 12:33:45 PM UTC-4, Stephen Paul King wrote:
On 9/14/2012 8:07 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Craig Weinberg
Fortunately or unfortunately,
Jesus did not do away with any OT laws.
He said so explicitly in the Sermon on the Mount.
Matthew 5:
[17] Think not that I have come to abolish the law and the prophets;
I have come not to abolish them but to fulfil them.
[18] For truly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, not an
iota,
Nonesense
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Richard Ruquist
He was talking about the 10 commandments.
He fulfilled them with his death and res.
Jesus did away for example with the dietary laws when
he said that it is not what a man puts into his
That should have happened from the get go (thorium reactors),
except that a bomb cannot be made from thorium.
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Sep 15, 2012 at 3:11 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
I'm giving a talk Monday on why we
Hi Stephan,
I would like to quibble about your statement:
For God, all things are given but once and there is no need to
compute the relations .
in terms of the OMEGA Point (OP).
Both in MWI and SWI, God (or whatever mechanism) is able to compute the OP.
But I suspect that the computation is not
I was waiting for your reply.
Alas, Jesus was a Jew
and Jews have 613 commandments,
not just 10.
Insults do not help your argument.
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Richard Ruquist
Another drive-by shooting. Just an unsupported denial
and you speed
Roger, So you must think that the jewish law condemning homosexual behavior
was eliminated by Jesus. It's not in the 10 and certainly Christians
are making a big fuss over it.
Richard
On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 8:21 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Richard Ruquist
I was irritated
Jesus said that he likes people to be hot or cold, atheists and
theists that keep all the commandments, even ones he added like
praying in a closet.
The other people are the least in heaven, which BTW implies that we
all make to heaven. He especially dislikes those who change or
reinterprete his
The Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation Temperature Signifying the
Existence of the Thought-Carrying Particle, Thought Retaining Particle
and Thought Force
Dhananjay Pal, Arun Uday De
Abstract
We developed a consciousness model. Our consciousness model
incorporating Thought-carrying particle
Collective consciousness
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 3:22 AM, Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.net wrote:
Any one up to explaining this:
http://www.qmul.ac.uk/media/news/items/se/38864.html
--
Onward!
Stephen
http://webpages.charter.net/stephenk1/Outlaw/Outlaw.html
--
You received this
201 - 300 of 896 matches
Mail list logo
