On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 2:33 AM, socra...@bezeqint.net
socra...@bezeqint.net wrote:
.Everybody creates his God according to his own image and spirit
If triangles made a God they would give him three sides
/ Charles de Montesquieu . Persian Letters, 1721 /
#
There were people who said ‘God
A block universe does not allow for consciousness.
The fact the we all possess consciousness, so we think,
means that our universe is not completely blocked,
although the deviations from block may be minor
and inconsequential regarding the Omega Point.
Richard.
On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:18 PM,
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 27 Jan 2013, at 18:27, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 1/27/2013 7:19 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
The big bang remains awkward with computationalism. It suggest a long and
deep computations is going through our state, but
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Stathis Papaioannou stath...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 1:04 AM, Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com wrote:
A block universe does not allow for consciousness.
The fact the we all possess consciousness, so we think,
means that our universe
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 9:32 PM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, January 29, 2013 8:39:40 PM UTC-5, yanniru wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Stathis Papaioannou stat...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 1:04 AM, Richard Ruquist yan...@gmail.com
wrote
, Jan 29, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Stathis Papaioannou
stat...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 1:04 AM, Richard Ruquist yan...@gmail.com
wrote:
A block universe does not allow for consciousness.
The fact the we all possess consciousness, so we think,
means that our universe
That just semantics. In my metaphysical string cosmology god is
created by the compactification of space dimensions.
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 4:02 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Kim
God is not himself created since the creator of all cannot create himself
and still remain a
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 1:46 AM, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com wrote:
In my metaphysical string cosmology god is created by the
compactification of space dimensions.
Then God was created just like we were and it's rather
1, 2013 8:15:57 AM UTC-5, yanniru wrote:
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 1:46 AM, John Clark johnk...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 Richard Ruquist yan...@gmail.com wrote:
In my metaphysical string cosmology god is created by the
compactification of space dimensions.
Then God
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 01 Feb 2013, at 14:15, Richard Ruquist wrote:
On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 1:46 AM, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com wrote:
In my metaphysical string cosmology
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 4:18 AM, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
2013/1/30 Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com
It is to me. I think it is very unlikely that the motions and
evolutions of star and galaxies and in my model even universes could
be strongly affected by biological
a lot), then we still can think, that the block universes is made of things
that exist, that we observe and things that don´t exist. It depends on the
notion of existence.
2013/2/2 Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com
On Sat, Feb 2, 2013 at 4:18 AM, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com
wrote
-01-30, 12:45:53
Subject: Re: Lessons from the Block Universe
On 29 Jan 2013, at 15:04, Richard Ruquist wrote:
A block universe does not allow for consciousness.
With comp consciousness does not allow any (aristotelian) universes.
There is comp block mindscape, and the universe(s
on this list.
Richard
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 7:33 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Richard Ruquist
The 4 dimensional or even the 11 dimensional universe
cannot contain mind, because mind is nonphysical and
they are physical. So the block universe is a waste of time
Straw dog there is no mention of a separation
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, February 3, 2013 9:37:42 AM UTC-5, yanniru wrote:
Dear Roger,
Only 4d spacetime, matter and energy are physical. Everything else is
non-physical and
Yes. I am a scientist. You are an engineer.
On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi Richard Ruquist
We live in mjuch different worlds, so it's hard to discuss things with you.
1) Spacetime itself is not physical.
2) Spacetime is not a slice of quantum
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 7:32 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
Hi Roger,
On 04 Feb 2013, at 16:43, Roger Clough wrote:
Hi Brunio,
I agree with Craig. And I've never understood how there can be any
consequence of an emulation,
or how it can be proven or not that comp works, since
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 05 Feb 2013, at 08:16, Kim Jones wrote:
http://io9.com/5981472/what-is-the-purpose-of-the-universe-here-is-one-possible-answer
OK - so rip into it and say why it's all nonsense.
It is full of sense, but a bit
Roger is on another list, the Mind/Brain forum which allows anything
to be discussed and even allows personal attacks. He should just stay
there unless he has something constructive to say. BTW every post he
makes to this list also goes to Mind/Brain
Richard
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Craig
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 17 Feb 2013, at 18:09, Jason Resch wrote:
Thanks to everyone who replied to this post. So far Stathis and Bruno both
answered that both cases are equivalent.
Is there anyone willing to argue against either:
1. you
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 2:03 AM, Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 3:18 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 2/18/2013 11:47 AM, Terren Suydam wrote:
If God is arithmetical truth, then what if anything is there to be said
about its character? I know
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 3:47 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 2/18/2013 11:03 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 3:18 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 2/18/2013 11:47 AM, Terren
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 6:31 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 20 Feb 2013, at 16:30, Richard Ruquist wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/2/20 Platonist Guitar Cowboy multiplecit...@gmail.com
Also, there is a weird thing
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 4:57 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 22 Feb 2013, at 04:10, Joseph Knight wrote:
Question: Why is the derivation* of the Born Rule in (Everett, 1957) not
considered satisfactory**?
Good question. I asked it myself very often.
*Everett shows that
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 7:50 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 25 Feb 2013, at 20:10, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 2/25/2013 1:26 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 25 Feb 2013, at 01:30, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Sunday, February 24, 2013 3:07:12 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Mitch,
My opinion is that monads are everywhere at a density of 10^90/cc,
and they precipitated out of space in the big bang
http://yanniru.blogspot.com/2013/
Richard
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 12:46 PM, spudboy...@aol.com wrote:
Questions. In your opinion, are Leibniz's monads individual thoughts,
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 4:00 PM, spudboy...@aol.com wrote:
Richard, a very good paper you have there. The Mindspace recording mechanism
you invoked sounds exactly like the Hindu akashic records feature to their
religion. For people like myself, you'd need to expand on the particular
physics of
Well if what emerges from comp is not physics, then physics refutes comp.
So that means that you can use physics to say what comp must emerge.
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Terren Suydam terren.suy...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, maybe I'm missing something but I'm not sure how a paper that assumes
Roger,
Yes Holographic content is empirically proportional
to the logarithm of the memory volume.
HC ~ log V
whereas Shannon Information of the universe is proportional to the
surface area of the holographic universe surface.(ie. the Lloyd Limit
based on the Bekenstein Bound)
SI ~ 10^120
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 8:43 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 10 Mar 2013, at 15:14, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Sunday, March 10, 2013 4:33:43 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 10 Mar 2013, at 01:48, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Saturday, March 9, 2013 7:26:25 PM UTC-5, Brent
Thanks Stephan,
My meta-model uses 3-folds
for which there are 7890 distinct configuration matrices.
I am not sure how that correlates with the physicist calculation of
the number of distinct Calabi-Yau compact-manifold convoluted
particles with 5oo holes and 10^1ooo possible flux windings i(for
Steve,
Does not the wiki ref imply that the number of countable models of a
first-order complete theory in a countable language is finite or Xo?
Richard
On Tue, Mar 12, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.net wrote:
Dear Bruno,
I have found a paper that seems to cover
Apparently the legacy view negates free will.
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
What does it mean to 'lose control' of something?
Your car, your bladder, your gambling, your pet Rottweiler...
What are the broad physical principles involved? What are
tjp,
If you allow that physical consciousness resides in a materialistic
BEC in the brain, and that the matter-BEC is entangled with a mind-BEC
where realistic quantum computations (comp) are manifest, then yes
physics is consistent with physical consciousness.
Richard Ruquist
On Sat, Mar 16
Roger,
Even faster. Instantly from a human perspective,
otherwie the universe cannot be holographic.
Richard
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi michael haaheim
Since mind is a MQS or Multiple Quantum Superposition, it can
process information at the
Hi Roger,
Very interesting. I was born in the town of Bristol, Connecticut, no
doubt named after your middle name.
I will consult your genealogy.
However, I am a mere first-generation American,
descended from Swedish emmigrants and a French American mother.
So I am half firs- generation
Roger's link to his genealogy:
Page Not Found
Sorry, we can't find the page you're looking for.
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Roger,
Very interesting. I was born in the town of Bristol, Connecticut, no
doubt named after your middle name.
I
Fascinating Roger,
I find it interesting that the names Bristol and Beecher were passed
down through the generations, one a remembrance of where we came from
and the other a remembrance of who we were.
Richard
On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 10:27 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Hi
My
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 8:06 AM, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com wrote:
These beliefs in robotic religión has some reasons behind or it is simply
wishful thinking?
2013/3/22 Evgenii Rudnyi use...@rudnyi.ru
Quotes from Robert Geraci, Apocalyptic AI: Visions of Heaven in Robotics,
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi use...@rudnyi.ru wrote:
On 22.03.2013 13:41 Richard Ruquist said the following:
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 8:06 AM, Alberto G. Corona
agocor...@gmail.com wrote:
These beliefs in robotic religión has some reasons behind or it is
simply wishful
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi use...@rudnyi.ru wrote:
On 22.03.2013 14:41 Richard Ruquist said the following:
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi use...@rudnyi.ru
wrote:
On 22.03.2013 13:41 Richard Ruquist said the following:
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 8:06 AM
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 4:42 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 3/22/2013 6:41 AM, Richard Ruquist wrote:
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi use...@rudnyi.ru wrote:
On 22.03.2013 13:41 Richard Ruquist said the following:
On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 8:06 AM, Alberto G
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 26 Mar 2013, at 18:19, meekerdb wrote:
On 3/26/2013 4:21 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
I can explain why if a machine can have experience and enough reflexivity,
then the machine can already understand that she cannot
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 28 Mar 2013, at 16:08, Richard Ruquist wrote:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:52 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 26 Mar 2013, at 18:19, meekerdb wrote:
On 3/26/2013 4:21 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
I can
I am a leftist astigmatic.
But you raise an interesting point that I believe supports a mind/brain
duality.
In a universe of functionalism or comp, I would expect that this would
never happen, as my brain should always prioritize the information made
available by any eye that is open over that of
My google account is forcing me to reply here rather than interspersed,
which is very inconvenient. But I will try.
1. As far as I know the universal mind is not aesthetic
2. Not sure what your 2nd question means
3. The universe has existed for 13.82 ly with little or no consciousness to
detect
NDE during surgery cannot be due to lack of oxygen
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 2:18 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 4/4/2013 11:02 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Thursday, April 4, 2013 12:11:36 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 4/4/2013 8:35 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 04 Apr 2013, at
There is no hell
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.comwrote:
On Friday, April 5, 2013 3:39:52 PM UTC-4, JohnM wrote:
I think I side with Craig: NDE is not N enough, is not D because the
'observer' (gossiper?) came back and not E - rather a compendium
of
Their admissions standards have already tanked
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 1:46 PM, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 8:50 AM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.comwrote:
This to me is revealing of the overall decline of science as tool of
Enlightenment into it's
My best example is the Harvard basketball team
which is now getting players into the NBA.
I ran with the cross country team
when I was there as a grad student.
They all got in because of their running ability,
not their intelligence.
That was back in the early 1960s.
So athletes have always had
Mathematics itself seems rather magical.
For instance the sum 1+2+3+4+5.infinity = -1/12
And according to Scott Aaronson's new book
when string theorists estimate the mass of a photon
they get two components: one being 1/12
and the other being that sum, so the mass is zero,
thanks to
comp treats such single photon instances. Does it use
algorithms that are random number generators?
Richard
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 10:35 AM, Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.comwrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com
wrote:
Mathematics itself seems rather
in another world and I
cannot get online.
Richard
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.comwrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 5:07 PM, Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com
wrote:
Telmo,
I can only give you my opinion.
Thanks Richard.
You are of course referring
The problem with electronic publishing is that for the most part such
papers are not peer reviewed. The one exception I know of is the Journal of
Cosmology- from personal experience. They rejected my paper because my
references were to the online arXiv.com rather than peer reviewed print
journals.
Bruno,
Could you explain by example how comp could be verified.?
That is does comp predict something that is not also predicted by science?
What comes to my mind is consciousness.
Richard
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 7:05 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 12 Apr 2013, at 02:47,
But Bruno,
because of the measure problem, MWI must also be probabilistic,
otherwise it does not agree with experiment.
Richard
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 7:10 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 12 Apr 2013, at 03:30, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 5:35 AM,
Is 10^122 or 10^1000 large enough?
Richard
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 7:33 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 12 Apr 2013, at 16:24, Richard Ruquist wrote:
Mathematics itself seems rather magical.
For instance the sum 1+2+3+4+5.infinity = -1/12
Well, with some convergence
at 10:35 AM, Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.comwrote:
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com
wrote:
Mathematics itself seems rather magical.
For instance the sum 1+2+3+4+5.infinity = -1/12
And according to Scott Aaronson's new book
when string theorists
Bruno, Please excuse my bottom posting but my gmail acct prevents me from
interleaving my responses.
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 9:21 AM, Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com wrote:
I have tried to study the UDA but lack sufficient understanding to see how
the UDA could compute an infinite number
Roger,
Most corporations do not pay any taxes at all
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 7:56 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
One of the great mysteries of liberalism
is the contradiction in its political stance
concerning rich corporations.
On the one hand, it rejects the attempts of
, at 19:21, Richard Ruquist wrote:
But Bruno, if comp only produces what is already known to science, how do
we know that comp is responsible? String theory has this problem
We never know such thing. We can only propose a theory, derive facts, and
verify them. If the facts follow the theory
Well, then make a testable prediction about something in the mind that is
not otherwise known.
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 4:59 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 15 Apr 2013, at 19:59, Richard Ruquist wrote:
Not true. GR and QM derived experimental results that were not known
Original Buddhism and Hindu Sankhya are atheistic religions.
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 11:44 AM, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
do you believe
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhist_philosophy)
I have incorporated these ideas into a conjectured theory of everything
based on digital physics that I unabashedly give you a link to (
http://vixra.org/abs/1303.0194) as it is too pseudo-science for
peer-reviewed publication.
Richard Ruquist
Most advanced ETs are already dead
and even less distinguishable from a god.
A book I am reading on Kindle for only $5
explains this in detail- how a recently dead atheist
could become a god, he not finding a god in the afterlife.
The Afterlife of a Restless Soul: But Is God Really a Woman?
This reminds me of Isaac Asimov's 1, 2, 3, infinity
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 6:46 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
The Leibniz-Taoist solution: Matter is mind, mind is matter
According to the Dao de jing, the solution to the mind-brain problem is
that it is not a problem.
. That it
is the hard problem. Perhaps like the pure materialists love to say, the
mind is merely an epiphenomenon, of the human brain. Ok, but I ask, does
the epiphenomenon, have a soul? ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com
To: everything-list
everything-list
Who would want to be resurrected into this hell hole?
clementine
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 5:57 PM, spudboy...@aol.com wrote:
**
So, Jason,by this reasoning, a sufficiently advanced technology, then, in
indistinguisable from Resurrection. I mention this because I have discussed
tech
Indeed I have had such an experience with a deceased person.
Richard
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 4:14 PM, John Mikes jami...@gmail.com wrote:
Russell and Richard:
do you indeed MEAN those conditions recalled after crises as NEAR DEATH?
Who knows what DEATH feels like? (- if it feels at all).
Bruno,
With MWI are some universes less probable than others.
I have difficulty understanding how a universe can be statistical.
I think I understand the frequency argument. But that does not make sense
either.
Richard
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On
I have to respond that in Judaism in the high holiday service there is a
prayer praising doubt.
I think that may be unique to Judaism?
Richard
On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
Russell wrote:
*...When it comes to Bp p capturing the notion of
Roger,
Your logic is humorous
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Strings are substances of one part and are thus monads
Strings are substances of one part by definition and are thus monads.
Each sgtring represents a particle monad. Mass and charge are
Roger,
Your logic is humorous
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Strings are substances of one part and are thus monads
Strings are substances of one part by definition and are thus monads.
Each sgtring represents a particle monad. Mass and charge are
Smolin believes in a multiverse else his fecund cosmology makes no sense.
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 5:17 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
*The views of Lee Smolin as opposed to those of *
*the Platonist, Leibniz *
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lee_Smolin
A. Leibniz would
True but only in the large particle limit
where waves become physical fields
and nature is classical and deterministic
does nature emulate logic and arithmetic.
Richard 'Yanni' Ru
-- Forwarded message --
From: Bill Taylor wfc.tay...@gmail.com
Date: Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 8:13 AM
Google does not know about 'Gauriga and Vilenkins Chaotic Inflation'.
It needs to be educated.
yanniru
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 11:40 PM, spudboy...@aol.com wrote:
The article seems to go along with Gauriga and Vilenkins Chaotic
Inflation. This would be occupying the phase space in the
Mass is sufficient to distort both our 4D spacetime
and its entangled 4D complex energy-momentum spacetime
because everything that happens in one is reflected in the other,
It's like Indras Pearls all reflecting each other.
because the Pearls are all entangled and quantum coherent.
Monads should
Astronomical observations of the cosmological constant has falsified the
hypothesis that all energy comes from zero-point energy by 120 orders of
magnitude, probably the strongest falsification ever achieved.
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
*Looking
LQG predicts that the speed of light depends on photon energy.
This has been falsified by Fermi telescope observations of gamma rays
over on order of magnitude variation in energy. All photons arrive at the
same time.
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 3:25 PM, spudboy...@aol.com wrote:
This may not be
theory,
even bosonic string theory?
-Original Message-
From: Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com
To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Fri, Jun 28, 2013 3:29 pm
Subject: Re: ***The holographic principle is a rational justification
for idealism**
LQG predicts
That 1+2+3+4+5+..to infinity equals minus 1/12
On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 4:40 AM, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.comwrote:
Now for me the most surprising thing is Homotophy type theory that
unifies spaces, proofs, computations and category theory in a different
foundation for mathematics.
Smolin's quantization of spacetime has been falsified buy Fermi telescope
observation of gamma rays of variable energies.
Presumably that includes Leibniz.
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 7:12 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Leibniz's quantization of spacetime.
Right. I reject the Abrahamic god in spite of being ben Avraham
but I am not an atheist.
My god derives from string theories Calabi-Yau Compact Manifolds.
Richard
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 10, 2013, at 7:24 AM, chris peck
Keep your rosaries away from our ovaries.
Keep your jihad bombs away our human bodies.
Keep your politics away from our nations politics.
None of the above are the result of faith, hope, love or humility.
Richard
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
I am
My chickens are racist. That is, being free range, they tend to hang out in
clusters where color is the common denominator.
That suggests to me that racism is a natural phenomenon. Richard
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 17 Jul 2013, at 15:52, Roger
Is there any merit to this paper?
-- Forwarded message --
From: May-Tzu ferdli...@yahoo.com
Date: Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 3:24 PM
Subject: [Swines] Human teleportation into space slower than walking(?)
To: swi...@yahoogroups.com
**
http://phys.org/print294413020.html
This may explain everything- pun intended
-- Forwarded message --
From: richard ruquist yann...@yahoo.com
Date: Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 6:42 AM
Subject: Fw: [Theoretical_Physics] Re: [4DWorldx] Fw: Re:
Re:[Theoretical_Physics_Board] OK, but think about this
To: yann...@gmail.com yann
Dominic Statham is a creationist.
http://creation.com/dominic-statham
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Serious proof of why the theory of evolution is wrong.
The irreducible complexity of DNA. See attached.
Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.) [1/1/2000]
According to Smolin's Fecund Universe hypothesis since verified by
Poplawski's GR spin theory,
it's generations of universes all the way down
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 12:57 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
I doesn't appeal to me. It seems to be just an otiose layer of
explanation on
If not all acquired characteristics are beneficial and in fact the vast
majority of them are not
how is that functionally different from mutations.
Richard David Ruquist
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 10:37 AM, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 Russell Standish
Is this the topic that stopped Bruno from posting in the everything list?
Have we lost Bruno for good?
Richard
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 1:59 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 8/11/2013 7:55 PM, Chris de Morsella wrote:
I would not be surprised to find that there is evidence of
I am on all the lists that to my knowledge he ever posted on and he has not
posted for some time now.
Richard
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 9:28 AM, chris peck chris_peck...@hotmail.comwrote:
I'm sure he still posts in some parallel feathers of the dove's tail. :)
--
Good to know. Thanks
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Quentin Anciaux allco...@gmail.comwrote:
ISTM, he said he was moving and won't be able to post for some times... So
I guess that's just it.
Quentin
2013/8/12 Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com
I am on all the lists that to my
Please do
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
If I hate income taxes, should I give up my american citizenshuip ?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k_6EqMESEVI
Dr. Roger B Clough NIST (ret.) [1/1/2000]
See my Leibniz site at
Good riddance
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Number of Americans Renouncing Citizenship Surges Expert Says 2013 on
Pace to See Highest Number of U.S. Expatriations Ever
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323977304579002780562003814.html
If you renounce your citizenship for tax purposes,
you have to leave the USA to realize the benefits
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 2:17 PM, Roger Clough rclo...@verizon.net wrote:
Should You Renounce Your U.S. Citizenship?
Since we are politically free lancing in the absence of the boss,
I must say that sometimes I wish that Roger were no longer existent.`
He is the bane of other lists as well- everyone that he is on TMK.
He must think he is doing missionary work.
Richard
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 3:58 PM,
It should be mentioned that final causation requires downward causation to
be operative.
See George Ellis for examples of downward causation at the human level.
http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1212/1212.2275.pdf
Recognising Top-Down Causation
George Ellis, University of Cape Town
Abstract: One
Likewise the self-driving cars on earth
and consciousness on the brain.
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Telmo Menezes te...@telmomenezes.comwrote:
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com wrote:
The Mars Rover is controlled from Earth.
That's hardly a bottom-up
I also agree that the notions of free will and qualia are two different
things.
My best example of how qualia relates to consciousness is based on my
dreams.
I dream in images which I say are very close to uninhibited/unreprocessed
consciousness.
Very often these images are of people who speak to
501 - 600 of 896 matches
Mail list logo
