Saey whaet?
On Wed, 2 May 2001, Brent Meeker wrote:
A true belief that has a casual connection with the fact that makes it
true.
Knowledge is when predicted.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
I'd like to post a quick followup to my own message to the list.
Thank you Fred and Russell for your responses. I think
the issues, for me, are these:
(1) I am now subscribed twice, so I get all messages to the list
twice -- and I receive three copies for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Wed, 3 May 2000, Higgo James wrote:
'Psychological time' is a concept of time, part of your current psychology.
Occam would disapprove of assuming that psychological events are real
events; assuming a hard, physical world when there is no need for one.
I
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A v B A - B
1 1 1 1 1 1
1 1 0 1 0 0
0 1 1 0 1 1
0 0 0 0 1 0
Just to help you guys out, the notation used here puts the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Mon, 15 May 2000, Jacques Mallah wrote:
Another way to go is to consider an implementation
of a computation, extended over time, as you. You
can't tell which implementation you are just from the
available information in an observer-moment.
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
First, let me state that I am not a scientist that deals
with this stuff -- so please forgive me if I seem
naive or non-technical... but I have a question:
Why are some people so adament about a plenitude or
a multiverse ... what proof is there that is so
On Sat, 10 Feb 2001, John Mikes wrote:
Scott
First: the past tense is objectionable unless the answer is negative (=Yes,
it didn't).
I don't approach my choice of and use of language by choosing words that
are continuously defendable from a certain perspective. That is,
I am not scientific
8 matches
Mail list logo
