,
marty a.
- Original Message -
From: Bruno Marchal
To: everything-l...@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2008 11:11 AM
Subject: Re: Reality
M.A
not copyable, are preparable (in the quantum prepare sense)
What is the quantum prepare sense? Could someone please clarify
the foregoing quote? m.a.
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Bruno,
I've often wondered why neither Dr. Deutsch nor Alan Forrester has
commented on your theory of UDA and AUDA. I certainly would be interested in
their views. A theory that has execised some of the best minds on this list for
months on end certainly deserves serious
Perhaps apropos.
Common let's do de zombie rock
All around de zombie block
http://www.dailypaul.com/node/90682
-Original Message-
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-l...@googlegroups.com]on Behalf Of Bruno Marchal
Sent:
Bruno,
If there was never a physical world to which living creatures
adapted after millions of years and which after further eons prompted the
evolution of consciousness, do we conclude that comp and numbers alone created
such a universe and then created people to experience
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2009 4:33 PM
Subject: Re: Consciousness is information?
Marty,
On 28 May 2009, at 15:41, m.a. wrote:
If there was never a physical world to which living creatures
adapted after millions of years
Bruno, I feel very much in tune with your definition of science, so I'll trudge
along with Kim as far as the UD allows me to follow the reasoning. m.a.
- Original Message -
From: Bruno Marchal
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2009 6:59 AM
Bruno,
I appreciate the simplicity of the examples. My answers follow the
questions.marty a.
- Original Message -
From: Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
= begin
===
1) SET
Informal
Bruno,
I stopped half-way through because I'm not at all sure of my answers
and would like to have them confirmed or corrected, if necessary, rather than
go on giving wrong answers. marty a.
- Original Message -
From: Bruno Marchal
To:
10:03 AM
Subject: Re: The seven step-Mathematical preliminaries 2
Hi Marty,
On 05 Jun 2009, at 00:30, m.a. wrote:
Bruno,
I don't have dyslexia
Good news.
but my keyboard doesn't contain either the UNION symbol or the INTERSECTION
symbol
Bruno,
Before I leave on holiday, I am following your advice to make my own
table of symbols. Let me ask first whether the smaller rectangles have a
different reference from the larger ones as seen in your example below?
- Original Message -
From: Bruno Marchal
To:
by a
rectangle in the next two examples and preceded by a rectangle in the last
three. In checking a table of logic notaion, I find that the relation such
that is designated by a reversed capital E. Is this the symbol you are
using? m.a.
- Original Message -
From: Bruno
Bruno,
I've encountered some difficulty with the examples below. You say
that in extension describes exhaustion or quasi-exhaustion. And you give
the example: B = {3, 6, 9, 12, ... 99}.
Then you define in intension with exactly the same type of set:
Example: Let A be
On this date, you made the following correction: You cannot write D = 4*x
..., But you wrote D= 4*x in the exercise just above it. I don't get
the distinction between your use of the equation and mine.
- Original Message -
From: Bruno Marchal
Exercise 2: I will
Bruno,
When I tried to copy the symbols from the URL cited below, I
found that my email server was not able to reproproduce the intersection or the
union symbol. See below:
From: Bruno Marchal
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
∅ ∪ A = I see two
Okay, so is it true to say that things written in EXTENSION are never in
formula style but are translated into formulas when we put them into INTENSION
form? You can see that my difficulty with math arises from an inability to
master even the simplest definitions.marty a.
-
: Re: The seven step-Mathematical preliminaries 2
m.a. wrote:
*Okay, so is it true to say that things written in EXTENSION are never
in formula style but are translated into formulas when we put them
into INTENSION form? You can see that my difficulty with math
arises from an inability
Bruno,
Yes, this seems very clear and will be helpful to refer back to if
necessary. m.a.
- Original Message -
From: Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sunday, June 07, 2009 4:33 AM
Subject: Re: The seven step-Mathematical
*Bruno et. al.,
Good news! I have discovered that the math
symbols copy faithfully here in my Thunderbird email.* *Henceforth, I
will open all list letters here. Please refresh my memory for the
following symbols:*
*
1. The ***?** *is
Bruno,
I'm still with you but I seriously wonder how far I can follow.
I have the sort of mind that groups of logical statement and propositions
cause to simply shut down. I am more than willing to accept that your proof
is consistent and I assume that others on the list will point
Hi Bruno,
I'm responding to the quiz (see below). What does high non
booleanity mean in the context of para.2?
- Original Message -
From: Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 6:45 AM
Subject: Re: The seven
02, 2009 1:44 PM
Subject: Re: The seven step series
You are quick!
On 02 Jul 2009, at 18:42, m.a. wrote:
Could you tell me if you understand and/or remember those definitions
(where a and b denoting arbitrary sets):
(a INTERSECTION b) = {x SUCH-THAT (x BELONGS
New comments in italics.
For example {1,2} INTERSECTION {2, 7} is equal to some set, actually the set
{2}. OK?..No!
Why not the sets {1,2,7} if INTERSECTION means
BOTH?
Bruno,
Can you provide definitions of belongs-to and included-in that
distinguish them from union and intersection?
Here we met a set of sets.
The set of subsets of a set, can only be, of course, a set of sets. The set
{2, 21, 14} is a set of numbers. The set { { }, {4,
Questions and comments interspersed below (in bold).
- Original Message -
From: Bruno Marchal
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, July 06, 2009 12:14 PM
Subject: Re: The seven step series
On 06 Jul 2009, at 16:12, m.a. wrote (in bold):
My answers
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 3:30 AM
Subject: Re: The seven step series
On 07 Jul 2009, at 04:03, m.a. wrote:
Questions and comments interspersed below (in bold)
{3, 5} belongs-to {3, 5} True
Not OK. The elements of {3, 5} are 3 and 5. {3, 5} is not an *element
- Original Message -
From: Bruno Marchal
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 2:07 PM
Subject: Re: The seven step series
On 07 Jul 2009, at 16:18, m.a. wrote:
Bruno,
I'm not entirely sure of these answers, but I think I learn more
Second try:
(power {1, 2, 3}) = ? {{ }, {1}, {2}, {3}, {1,2}, {2,3}, {1,2,3}}
.
And I give you a little subject research: if a set x has n elements, how many
elements are in (power x)?
How's this for a wild guess? I have a feeling that it's missing the
accolades, but I have
- Original Message -
From: Bruno Marchal
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 4:40 AM
Subject: Re: The seven step series
Hi Kim, Marty, Johnathan, John, Mirek, and all...
Bruno: May I advise you about an instance of English usage? The
Bruno,
I have no idea how to even begin to answer these questions. Have
you given us the definitions we need to do so?
David,
I appreciated this post because I'm more interested in the
philosophical implications (which I'm hoping to find at the end of Bruno's
UDA bridge to Valhalla) of these goings-on ...than in the mathematical
ones. Best,
of humor. Rereading some post, I
realize some nuance in the tone does not go through mailings. Please indulge
professional deformation of an old math teacher ...
On 17 Jul 2009, at 03:12, m.a. wrote:
David,
I appreciated this post because I'm more interested
@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, July 20, 2009 3:17 PM
Subject: Re: The seven step series
On 20 Jul 2009, at 15:34, m.a. wrote:
And then we have seen that such cardinal was given by 2^n.
You can see this directly by seeing that adding an element in a set, double
the number of subset, due
of length n,
make two copies, to one copy append a 0 and to the other copy append a 1.
Brent
m.a. wrote:
Hi Bruno,
I'm not clear on the sentence in bold below,
especially the word correspondingly. The example of Mister X only
confuses me more. Could you please give some
,
m.
(mathematically hopeless) a.
Brent
m.a. wrote:
*Thanks Brent,*
* Could you supply some illustrative examples
Going a step further... (see below)
- Original Message -
From: Brent Meeker meeke...@dslextreme.com
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 12:57 PM
Subject: Re: The seven step series
m.a. wrote:
Hi Brent,
I really appreciate the help
Bruno,
See desperate questions below.
marty a.
- Original Message -
From: Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 11:01 AM
Subject: Re: Dreams and
Hi Bruno,
I asked Brent Meeker a question which he referred back to you.
Will you be covering it? (see para in bold below)
- Original Message -
From: Brent Meeker meeke...@dslextreme.com
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 11:49 PM
. So I beg you to always
advance in baby steps with lots of space between statements. I want to assure
you that I'm printing out all of your 7-step lessons and using them for study
and reference. Thanks for your patience, m.a.
-- Original Message -
From: Bruno Marchal
with different subjects.
Thanks,marty a.
- Original Message -
From: Bruno Marchal
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 6:37 AM
Subject: Re: Seven Step Series
On 23 Jul 2009, at 05:44, m.a. wrote:
if a is a number, usually, a^n
Bruno,
You overlooked the question at the bottom of the page that I tried
unsuccessfully to work out. Brent supplied the answer but what I was looking
for were the steps that lead up to the answer. marty
- Original Message -
From: Bruno Marchal
To:
Series
On 23 Jul 2009, at 05:44, m.a. wrote:
if a is a number, usually, a^n is the result of effectuating (a
times a
times a time a ... times a), with n occurences of a. For example:
2^3 =
2x2x2 = 8.I thought 2^3 meant (2*2)* (4*2)* (8*2)= 16
Bruno,
I am indeed ready to pursue further and since we'll be covering
both topics anyhow, I would prefer that you choose which would be the most
natural next step for us.
Also, I assume you have seen the following and I wondered if it
tends to confirm UDA.
Bruno,
I have searched my notes for an exposition of BIJECTION and found
only one mention in an early email which promises to define it in a later
lesson. Do you have a reference to that lesson or perhaps an instant
explanation of it? Thanks,
Bruno,
I'm terribly sorry to disappoint you and ashamed to admit that I'm
throwing in the towel. This is an idiom used in professional boxing; when a
coach decides that his fighter can't take anymore punishment, he ends the fight
by throwing a towel into the ring. I simply don't have
Mirek,
I think it must be a very effective method of teaching binary
numbers. Perhaps I'll try it on my grandchildren. My four-year-old grandson
calls VCR tapes rectangular DVD's. So he's probably ready for abstract
thinking. Thanks for the lesson.
a.
- Original Message -
From: Mirek Dobsicek m.dobsi...@gmail.com
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Saturday, August 22, 2009 11:05 AM
Subject: Re: The seven step series
m.a. wrote
Hello Mirek,
Let us recall that Socrates was famous for setting up
straw men who usually agreed to every step of his proof and were finally
forced by logic, against their previous judgments, to accept his
conclusions. I would dearly love to see an unedited video of the
Bruno,
Just to let you know that while I can't do the exercises, I am
following as best I can. I think I understand that powersets of sets lead to
ladders of larger and larger infinities and hope your exposition of how this
results in the existence of universal machines will be
,
m.a.
- Original Message -
From: Bruno Marchal
A modest question. What's left of materialism (to even argue about) when
orthodox theoretical physics itself sees the world in terms of virtual
particles and one-dimensional strings? m.a.
- Original Message -
From: Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
To: everything-list
- Original Message -
From: Flammarion peterdjo...@yahoo.com
To: Everything List everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 10:46 AM
Subject: Re: Yablo, Quine and Carnap on ontology
On 15 Sep, 15:19, m.a. marty...@bellsouth.net wrote:
A modest question
On 15 Sep, 15:19, m.a. marty...@bellsouth.net wrote:
A modest question. What's left of materialism (to even argue about)
when
orthodox theoretical physics itself reduces the world to virtual
particles and one-dimensional strings? m.a.
What makes you think they are not material
- Original Message -
From: Flammarion peterdjo...@yahoo.com
To: Everything List everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 11:25 AM
Subject: Re: Yablo, Quine and Carnap on ontology
On 16 Sep, 15:51, m.a. marty...@bellsouth.net wrote:
the ocean
- Original Message -
From: Flammarion peterdjo...@yahoo.com
To: Everything List everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 6:30 PM
Subject: Re: Yablo, Quine and Carnap on ontology
On 17 Sep, 14:12, m.a. marty...@bellsouth.net wrote:
- Original Message
Bruno,
I don't really remember what saying yes to the doctor entails.
If it signifies a willingness to be cloned by computation, shouldn't we be
saying yes to the Star Trek technician who controls the transporter? m.a.
- Original Message -
From: Bruno Marchal marc
- Original Message -
From: Brent Meeker meeke...@dslextreme.com
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Saturday, September 19, 2009 8:49 PM
Subject: Re: Yablo, Quine and Carnap on ontology
m.a. wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Brent Meeker meeke...@dslextreme.com
And when pressed as to exactly how the Heisenberg compensators worked, the
spokesman replied, Very well, thank you.
- Original Message -
From: ronaldheld ronaldh...@gmail.com
To: Everything List everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2009 4:30 PM
Subject: Re:
Mirek,
What's an MBOX and how do you send it?
marty a.
- Original Message -
From: Miroslav Dobsicek m.dobsi...@gmail.com
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, September 21,
/export
emails in a given folder. While exporting, mbox file format is the
preferred outcome, but in principle I can deal with other formats too.
3. step
Send an email and attach the file FOR-MIREK.
Cheers,
mirek
m.a. wrote:
Mirek,
What's an MBOX and how do you send
- Original Message -
From: Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2009 10:36 AM
Subject: Re: Yablo, Quine and Carnap on ontology
Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 21 Sep 2009, at 23:48, m.a. wrote:
*And when pressed as to exactly
How you can remember all those technical details is astonishing, but thanks
for the confirmation and the trip down memory lane. marty a.
- Original Message -
From: ronaldheld ronaldh...@gmail.com
To: Everything List everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, September
Would anyone care to provide a gloss to all the capital letter codes being used
in this thread? (e.g. CTM, PM, UD etc.)
- Original Message -
From: David Nyman david.ny...@gmail.com
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2009 8:12 AM
Subject: Re: Yablo,
Again thanks,
Hopefully, these notes plus David Nyman's will allow me
to orient myself--at least roughly--in the sturm und drang of debate.m.a.
- Original Message -
From: Bruno Marchal
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, September
/9/23 m.a. marty...@bellsouth.net:
CTM = Computational Theory of Mind
CT = Church Thesis
PM = Primitive Matter
(A)UDA = (Arithmetical) Universal Dovetailer Argument
AR = Arithmetical Realism
MR = Multiple Realisability
WR = White Rabbit
MGA = Movie Graph Argument
Olympia = Tim Maudlin's anti-CTM
And HP stands for???
- Original Message -
From: David Nyman david.ny...@gmail.com
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 9:50 AM
Subject: Re: Dreaming On
2009/9/24 Flammarion peterdjo...@yahoo.com:
Another point that has got rather lost here is
Or the barber is a special exception to the group designated as men and
exists on a higher level of being. Therefore he can shave himself without
transgressing the rule as stated in the premise. Isn't this one of Russell's
paradoxes? marty a.
- Original Message -
From:
And didn't Russell decide that this type of paradox should be outlawed from
allowable statements within the practice of logic? m.a.
- Original Message -
From: m.a.
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Saturday, October 10, 2009 7:30 PM
Subject: Re: The seven step
What's the URL?
- Original Message -
From: ronaldheld ronaldh...@gmail.com
To: Everything List everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, October 12, 2009 8:56 AM
Subject: How many universe in the Multiverse?
Arxiv:0910.1589v1
Any comments?
thread will soon be resumed
On 07 Nov 2009, at 01:04, m.a. wrote:
Bruno,
Good to see you back! I have a question with reference to the
experiment described in the first person indeterminacy paper. If, before the
teleportation, the omniscient authority tells
I think that's the question Bruno's proof is designed to answer in the
negative, a conclusion of which I have difficulty convincing myself.m.a.
- Original Message -
From: John Mikes
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Saturday, November 07, 2009 11:16 AM
Kelly,
I read Blood Meridian recently and was utterly blown away. The
endless abundance of vivid natural imagery couched in the most erudite
language is only equaled by by the casual articulation of the most extreme
violence imaginable. McCarthy's novel rises as far above western
Bruno,
This is a stupid question but I'm hoping it contains the kernel of
an idea. Since logic is based on a few common definitions, do you really need
all these complicated steps and permutations to prove a theory? Why can't you
show us what you mean in a handful of clear, simple,
unable to do. I assume
that more easily demonstrable proofs will appear when predictions based on your
ideas attain experimental reality e.g. teleportation, digital brain recording
and so on. Till then I remain, without religious implications, a believer.
m.a.
- Original Message
As a tyro, I'm wondering whether this is just a summary of what physicists
already know or a genuine conceptual breakthrough.marty a.
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 7:18 AM, ronaldheld ronaldh...@gmail.com wrote:
http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0912/0912.3433.pdf
any comments on
Interesting how the repeated copying and recopying of emails ends up
resembling the typography of modern poetry. m.a.
I know. I'm trying to see
what exactly is being
assumed
about
People seem to be predisposed to accept AI programs as human(oid) if one can
judge by reactions to Hal, Colossus, Robby, Marvin etc. m.a.
- Original Message -
From: Brent Meeker meeke...@dslextreme.com
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, January 18, 2010 6:09 PM
Autistic God
What worlds
but bipolar?
...No more questions!
Look kid
I am what I am.
Get used to it.
marty abramson
- Original Message -
Bruno:
Does the following relate at all to your theory of Comp?
Each life is an equation. Each person is given parts of the equation with
many variables on both sides of the equals sign.
Most equations have only one solution which, however, can be solved in
different ways: simple
Subject: Re: On the computability of consciousness
Hi Marty,
On 25 Feb 2010, at 15:03, m.a. wrote:
Bruno:
Does the following relate at all to your theory of Comp?
I am not so sure, or I don't see how. I don't address the question of
individual life. What I show is true for all
Bruno,
ummm...I don't follow this answer. Does your reply affirm free will, deny it or
take some other tact? m.a.
- Original Message -
From: Bruno Marchal
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 12:01 PM
Subject: Re: Free will
Marty
respect. marty a.
- Original Message -
From: m.a.
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 3:42 PM
Subject: Re: Free will
Bruno,
ummm...I don't follow this answer. Does your reply affirm free will, deny it
or take some other tact
- Original Message -
From: Brent Meeker
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 4:38 PM
Subject: Re: Free will: Wrong entry.
On 3/11/2010 1:26 PM, m.a. wrote:
Bruno and John,
The confusion is my fault. I
- Original Message -
From: Brent Meeker
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2010 5:14 PM
Subject: Re: Free will: Wrong entry.
On 3/11/2010 1:56 PM, m.a. wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Brent Meeker
To: everything
what kind of a 'universe' is it? bootstrap, self reflecting
autodidacta? Creator-made?
John M
On 3/11/10, Brent Meeker meeke...@dslextreme.com wrote:
On 3/11/2010 1:26 PM, m.a. wrote:
Bruno and John,
The confusion is my fault. I
- Original Message -
From: Bruno Marchal
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 11:54 AM
Subject: Re: Free will: Wrong entry.
Marty,
I think the question, Do you believe in free will? could as easily be,
Do you believe in Santa Claus or
- Original Message -
From: Bruno Marchal
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 2:49 PM
Subject: Re: Free will: Wrong entry.
On 12 Mar 2010, at 18:34, m.a. wrote:
What sort of short cut are you talking about? I don't see any short cuts
: Bruno Marchal
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Saturday, March 13, 2010 6:37 AM
Subject: Re: Free will: Wrong entry.
On 12 Mar 2010, at 21:53, m.a. wrote:
I agree with you that quantum indeterminacy doesn't affect
(free) will: Quantum mechanics is local
Please see questions below (in bold).
- Original Message -
From: Bruno Marchal
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Saturday, March 13, 2010 12:40 PM
Subject: Re: Free will: Wrong entry.
On 13 Mar 2010, at 16:00, m.a. wrote:
Bruno,
Thanks
, by making us live consequences of act we don't
do.
How can there be indeterminacy in comp when there are no material particles
subject to Heisenberg's theory, only numbers? Is there an element of chance in
the universal dovetailing of pure numbers?
m.a.
--
You received
- Original Message -
From: Bruno Marchal
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2010 8:13 AM
Subject: Re: Free will: Wrong entry.
On 16 Mar 2010, at 02:55, m.a. wrote:
Bruno
How can there be indeterminacy in comp when
identify and favor our normal histories? How do the lobian
numbers affect the UD. (I think you've answered these questions before but not
in ways that are clear to me. Please give it one last try.) m.a.
Bruno
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
--
You received
@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2010 1:30 PM
Subject: Re: Free will: Wrong entry.
On 17 Mar 2010, at 14:06, m.a. wrote:
But is there a deliberate feedback (of any kind) between first person and
UD?
No. The UD can be seen as a set of elementary arithmetical truth, realizing
Bruno,
Thanks for this great refresher course.
marty a.
- Original Message -
From: Bruno Marchal
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2010 5:59 AM
, landmark, outcrop,
distinctive rock or tree; and he remembered passing each place sequentially,
would this not count as strong evidence that the past is real? m.a.
- Original Message -
From: Bruno Marchal
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Monday, May 03, 2010 1:17 PM
: Re: The past hypothesis
On 5/3/2010 12:39 PM, m.a. wrote:
If someone hiking along the twisting highway that follows the cliffs in
Northern Italy or coastal California, high above the sea, should reach a point
that protrudes so far out that looking back, he can see the entire route he had
I may have this all wrong, but it seems to me that for there to be umpteen
trillion copies of a person there had to be umpteen trillion (UT) copies of his
parents. And only a relatively small sub-group of those met and cohabited at
the exact moment of his/her conception. But the same must have
- Original Message -
From: Stathis Papaioannou
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Thursday, May 20, 2010 4:35 PM
Subject: Re: Quantum Immortality considering Passing Out
On 20/05/2010, at 4:12 PM, m.a. marty...@bellsouth.net wrote:
I may have this all
- Original Message -
From: Quentin Anciaux
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 9:19 AM
Subject: Re: Quantum Immortality considering Passing Out
2010/5/21 m.a. marty...@bellsouth.net
- Original Message -
From: Stathis
It's all in Scott Patterson's Quants. m.a.
- Original Message -
From: Brent Meeker
To: Atoms and the Void ; EveryThing ; Rob Shostak
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 3:22 PM
Subject: Fwd: unexpected application of logic
I asked a mathematician friend, Ed Clark, about
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
