Excellent, Bruno, Thanks!
Barry
On Dec 19, 2007, at 7:57 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Hi Barry,
Le 18-déc.-07, à 18:52, Barry Brent a écrit :
Bruno--
Ahh, my amateur status is nakedly exposed. I'm going to expose my
confusion even further now.
That is the courageous attitude
with these ideas a very long time
ago. Sorry if I'm way off topic. Tell me to go look it up
somewhere, or stop wasting time, if you want to...
Barry Brent
On Dec 18, 2007, at 8:49 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Le 17-déc.-07, à 19:04, meekerdb (Brent Meeker) wrote:
Bruno wrote:
Exercise:
What is wrong
that this English language description is finite doesn't prove
that g is computable with regard to L, ie, doesn't prove that g is
one of the f_n.
I'm an amateur at this--this solution is really just a question for
Bruno...
Barry (Barry Brent, not Brent Meeker
in the ordered set.
If anyone can find where I've gone wrong, please let me know.
Dan Grubbs
Dr. Barry Brent
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.earthlink.net/~barryb0/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
found with this method may actually be in the
enumeration, but with an ill-defined index.
Dan
Dr. Barry Brent
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.earthlink.net/~barryb0/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
guess, I'll be fine at the beginning of the New Year.
Sincerely,
Mirek
Dr. Barry Brent
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.earthlink.net/~barryb0/
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List
20-nov.-07, à 23:39, Barry Brent wrote :
You're saying that, just because you can *write down* the missing
sequence (at the beginning, middle or anywhere else in the list),
it follows that there *is* no missing sequence. Looks pretty
wrong to me. Cantor's proof disqualifies any candidate
7 matches
Mail list logo
