questions. Are the philosophical
discussions applicable to the development of AI (i.e., trying to grasp all
aspects of the mind of man if you are trying to develop a true copy), or are
they only interesting diversions that pop-up from time to time. My thanks
to anyone who wishes to respond.
Jeanne
I once read an article in, I believe, Time Magazine, about the relatively
new field of neurotheology which investigates what goes on in the brain
during ecstatic states, etc. One suggestion that intrigued me was that it
may be possible that in such a state, and I believe that schizophrenics were
I am a mere layperson who
follows your discussions with great interest, so forgive me if I'm about to ask
a question whose answer is apparent to all but me. I am very familiar with
the "first person" and "third person" concept in everyday life and literature,
but I am a little unclear
I am not a scientist, just an avid reader of the fascinating ideas presented
in your discussion threads. Although I frequently get lost, particularly
when the math enters into it, I keep on reading everyone's comments and the
links that you frequently provide to more thorough discussions of the
I also deleted everything immediately, fearing the viral possibilities of
the attachments.
Jeanne
- Original Message -
From: CMR [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 9:40 AM
Subject: Re: Quantum Rebel
Oops, I too was a victim of viral paranoia this
George,
Thank you so much for the
explanation, and for the links. Now when I read the discussions, I won't
be quite so lost.
Jeanne
- Original Message -
From:
George Levy
To: Everything List
Sent: Sunday, June 13, 2004 1:49 AM
Subject: Re: Shadows and smeared
I am a quantum physics enthusiast, but merely an amateur who finds the
discussion threads of this group to be quite interesting. I have never
before commented because, to be honest, I am rather lost in regard to the
discussion of first person and third person. I am trying to figure out
exactly
7 matches
Mail list logo
