I will never get this bother about "consistency" or "objectivity" in QM as
a probabilist.
In [ Hilbert Spaces from Path Integrals -
https://arxiv.org/pdf/1002.0589.pdf ] section *2 *restates a type of
probability space that models QM. Nothing more really needs to be said
about QM - at the
It is the case that objectivity or the existence of an ontological reality
is uncertain. With the Frauscher-Renner result it is also uncertain to what
extent quantum mechanics is epistemological. Even measurements do not yield
a consistent result between all possible observers. So what is known
it predicts that it appears to observers as if there was an external world
that evolves according to simple, computable, probabilistic laws. In
contrast to the standard view, objective reality is not assumed
OK. :)
@philipthrift
On Saturday, January 11, 2020 at 3:36:51 AM UTC-6, Evgenii
3 matches
Mail list logo
