Re: On Russell's Derivation of Quantum Mechanics

2008-04-27 Thread Russell Standish
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 08:13:01AM -0700, Youness Ayaita wrote: > > I have elaborated a comprehensive analysis of Russell's derivation of > quantum mechanics; the article can be found online on my homepage: > > http://www.rzuser.uni-heidelberg.de/~yayaita/Russell_Derivation_QM.pdf > I have pos

RE: On Russell's Derivation of Quantum Mechanics

2008-04-27 Thread Hal Ruhl
D] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Russell Standish Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2008 6:31 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: On Russell's Derivation of Quantum Mechanics Hi Youness, Thanks for this, it is very impressive. You have gone into this in far more depth than the referees of the &q

Re: On Russell's Derivation of Quantum Mechanics

2008-04-21 Thread Günther Greindl
Hi Russell, >and Roy Frieden's approaches, and have you read Cosma Shalizi's review of Frieden's book? http://www.cscs.umich.edu/~crshalizi/reviews/physics-from-fisher-info/ I am not familiar with Frieden's Theory, but I know that Shalizi's reviews are well founded. Regards, Günther --~--~

Re: On Russell's Derivation of Quantum Mechanics

2008-04-20 Thread Russell Standish
Hi Youness, Thanks for this, it is very impressive. You have gone into this in far more depth than the referees of the "Why Occams Razor" paper. I will respond to this soon, but rather than shoot from the hip, I'll take some time to respond thoughtfully. As for not proclaiming scientific revolut