Hal Finney wrote:
It's not clear to me what is wrong with letting a standard TM operate for
a transfinite number of steps. We usually give the TM an infinite tape,
and we feel free to imagine the infinite tape initialized with an infinite
number of symbols.
Only with oracle machine.
That in
On Fri, Oct 13, 2000 at 08:25:39PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure it would be zero. The program for the CSO is not
particularly complex compared to other observer programs. If you have the
program for a constant-speed observer then you only need to simulate the
program,
Wei Dai wrote:
On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 01:13:35PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It may be impossible to construct such a machine in our universe, but
can we
achieve the same results by slowing down the consciousness of the
observer
observing a conventional computer? In other words,
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: The Rapidly-Accelerating Computer
James writes:
There is no distinction. No observer-moments are related. No
observations
are related to events. But of course, all observer-moments exists, and
all
events
4 matches
Mail list logo
