Re: [Fwd: Apparently not a spoof...]

2007-08-10 Thread John Mikes
On 8/9/07, On 09/08/2007, at 5:06 AM, Brent Meeker wrote: Here's a school that's ahead of Bruno in taking consistency to be part of theology. :-) http://chfbs.org/high_school/high_sch_math.htm Brent Meeker I clicked up the URL: it does not seem to include anyrhing like

Re: [Fwd: Apparently not a spoof...]

2007-08-09 Thread Kim Jones
Could you provide some info on this, please? How can we be sure it isn't a spoof? Which US Baptist college is this? Can't decipher the logo... cheers, Kim Jones On 09/08/2007, at 5:06 AM, Brent Meeker wrote: Here's a school that's ahead of Bruno in taking consistency to be part of

Re: [Fwd: Apparently not a spoof...]

2007-08-09 Thread Bruno Marchal
Hm I think it is preferable to introduce a few math in a theology course (which can be done by making some precise hypotheses like comp or lobianity) than to introduce theology in math. They are naming and invoking the unnameable! I know it is not always easy to motivate people for

Re: [Fwd: Apparently not a spoof...]

2007-08-09 Thread Kim Jones
What is lobian apart from la machine, Bruno? Are you referring to angels here? Aren't angels machines too? K On 09/08/2007, at 7:03 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote: Also, if we are machine (or just lobian), we can indeed contemplate the consistency of *little part* of math, but certainly

[Fwd: Apparently not a spoof...]

2007-08-08 Thread Brent Meeker
Here's a school that's ahead of Bruno in taking consistency to be part of theology. :-) http://chfbs.org/high_school/high_sch_math.htm Brent Meeker --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Everything