On 24 Jan 2013, at 21:49, meekerdb wrote:
On 1/24/2013 12:19 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
Bruno,
What is meant by the informational interpretations? Is that
something like the one Ron Garrett presented?
It's the view most advocated by Asher and Fuchs, that the WF is just
an encoding of
On Friday, January 25, 2013 6:44:14 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 24 Jan 2013, at 21:49, meekerdb wrote:
On 1/24/2013 12:19 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
Bruno,
What is meant by the informational interpretations? Is that something
like the one Ron Garrett presented?
It's the view
On 24 Jan 2013, at 04:03, Gary Oberbrunner wrote:
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1301.1069v1.pdf See question 12.
Interesting. Thanks.
A bit sad, also.
If it takes time to understand the MWI of the SWE (which writes it
almost explicitly), I guess it will take time to understand the
universal
Bruno,
What is meant by the informational interpretations? Is that something like
the one Ron Garrett presented?
The informational and MW together got 42% of the vote, equal to Copenhagen.
Jason
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 24 Jan 2013, at
On 1/24/2013 12:19 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
Bruno,
What is meant by the informational interpretations? Is that something like the one Ron
Garrett presented?
It's the view most advocated by Asher and Fuchs, that the WF is just an encoding of what
the experimenter knows about the physical
5 matches
Mail list logo