Re: Definiteness of Meaning (was: A superposition in QM is just due to a choice of basis?)

2010-09-19 Thread 1Z
On 18 Sep, 22:20, Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.net wrote: Hi Peter and Friends, -Original Message- From: everything-list@googlegroups.com [mailto:everything-l...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of 1Z Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 8:16 AM To: Everything List Subject: Re: A

RE: Definiteness of Meaning (was: A superposition in QM is just due to a choice of basis?)

2010-09-18 Thread Stephen P. King
Hi Peter and Friends, -Original Message- From: everything-list@googlegroups.com [mailto:everything-l...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of 1Z Sent: Friday, September 17, 2010 8:16 AM To: Everything List Subject: Re: A superposition in QM is just due to a choice of basis? On 28 Aug, 20:29,

Re: A superposition in QM is just due to a choice of basis?

2010-09-17 Thread 1Z
On 28 Aug, 20:29, Stephen P. King stephe...@charter.net wrote: Hi Bret,             Could you elaborate on this point and/or point me to a good discussion of it? From what I have studied so far there is no solution to the measurement problem so far in terms of an explanation of the way that

RE: A superposition in QM is just due to a choice of basis?

2010-08-28 Thread Stephen P. King
Hi Bret, Could you elaborate on this point and/or point me to a good discussion of it? From what I have studied so far there is no solution to the measurement problem so far in terms of an explanation of the way that the choice is made in each successive event, world or whatever.

Re: A superposition in QM is just due to a choice of basis?

2010-08-28 Thread Brent Meeker
On 8/28/2010 12:29 PM, Stephen P. King wrote: Hi Bret, Could you elaborate on this point and/or point me to a good discussion of it? From what I have studied so far there is no solution to the measurement problem so far in terms of an explanation of the way that the choice is