eaningless to say that object had properties, and
>
> absolute relativism could not exist because there would be nothing to
> relate to it.
>
>
A very interesting point: of course "if there were only one object in the
universe" postulates already two objects (even much m
On Friday, February 23, 2018 at 3:01:08 PM UTC+1, telmo_menezes wrote:
>
> I find it interesting that you resort to an image. I suspect that what you
> are trying to communicate cannot be fully communicated with language. That
> is perhaps what art is for?
>
>
Well, images and art are a
, if there were only one object in the universe it would be meaningless
to say that object had properties, and
absolute relativism could not exist because there would be nothing to
relate to it.
>
> Absolute relativism, however, as we have said at the beginning, presents
> us wi
> think that the argument could be stronger.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Telmo.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 8:53 PM, Francesco D'Isa
>> <frances...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hello, I found this group through the book Theory o
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 8:53 PM, Francesco D'Isa
> <frances...@gmail.com > wrote:
> > Hello, I found this group through the book Theory of Nothing – both a
> very
> > pleasant discovery. I would like to submit to your potential curiosity
> this
> >
ng – both a very
> pleasant discovery. I would like to submit to your potential curiosity this
> essay about Absolute relativism. It's part of a bigger work in progress
> whose conclusions are very close to this group's.
>
> https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3044
>
> Es
Hello, I found this group through the book *Theory of Nothing – *both a
very pleasant discovery. I would like to submit to your potential curiosity
this essay about Absolute relativism
<https://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/3044>. It's part of a bigger work
in progress whose concl
7 matches
Mail list logo
