On Monday, January 1, 2018 at 7:08:05 PM UTC-6, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> On Monday, January 1, 2018 at 5:01:53 PM UTC-7, Lawrence Crowell wrote:
>>
>> On Monday, January 1, 2018 at 4:04:37 PM UTC-6, agrays...@gmail.com
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
Most of what you write is above my pay grade.
On Monday, January 1, 2018 at 5:01:53 PM UTC-7, Lawrence Crowell wrote:
>
> On Monday, January 1, 2018 at 4:04:37 PM UTC-6, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Most of what you write is above my pay grade. I am asking whether the EM
>> or other environmental interactions between two entangled p
On Monday, January 1, 2018 at 4:04:37 PM UTC-6, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>> Most of what you write is above my pay grade. I am asking whether the EM
> or other environmental interactions between two entangled particles while
> they are causally connected, for establishing a variable that wo
't they communicate at this time, setting their
>> spins appropriately, oppositely? (I don't think so they can't know in which
>> direction spin will be measured.) Is this another local hidden variable
>> theory falsified by Bell experiments? TIA, AG
>>
&g
;t think so they can't know in which
> direction spin will be measured.) Is this another local hidden variable
> theory falsified by Bell experiments? TIA, AG
>
This question is a bit difficult for me to parse. To generate an entangled
state it does require an interaction between
they can't know in which
> direction spin will be measured.) Is this another local hidden variable
> theory falsified by Bell experiments? TIA, AG
>
Yes, obviously. The particles are spacelike separated from each other,
but timelike separated from the point in the past when they
Two entangled electrons interact via EM processes as they separate while
time-like separated. Couldn't they communicate at this time, setting their
spins appropriately, oppositely? (I don't think so they can't know in which
direction spin will be measured.) Is this another local
7 matches
Mail list logo
