potentials in the interface
>>>> theory?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Again, I don't know what he would say, but to me, the interface is
>>> representing the presence of experience on some distant level. The raw
>>> stuff of the universe, in my view, is sel
t; representing the presence of experience on some distant level. The raw
>> stuff of the universe, in my view, is self-nesting sensory-motive
>> phenomena...represented by more of the same.
>>
>
> I would say that there is no "raw stuff" there is only nested levels
gt; phenomena...represented by more of the same.
>
I would say that there is no "raw stuff" there is only nested levels of
models of incontrovertible experiential content.
>
> Thanks,
> Craig
>
>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Dan
>>
>> On Tuesday, Janu
't know what he would say, but to me, the interface is
representing the presence of experience on some distant level. The raw
stuff of the universe, in my view, is self-nesting sensory-motive
phenomena...represented by more of the same.
Thanks,
Craig
> Cheers,
>
> Dan
>
he macroscopic level?) and are interpreted by a human user.
What is the analogue of the voltage potentials in the interface theory?
Cheers,
Dan
On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 1:31:56 PM UTC-5, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
> Donald Hoffman Video on Interface Theory of
> Consciousness<http
Donald Hoffman Video on Interface Theory of
Consciousness<http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=dqDP34a-epI>
A very good presentation with lot of overlap on my views. He proposes
similar ideas about a sensory-motive primitive and the nature of the world
as experience rather than “objective”. W
6 matches
Mail list logo
