Re: Entanglement of macro objects

> On 10 May 2018, at 20:05, Lawrence Crowell > wrote: > > On Tuesday, May 8, 2018 at 2:51:14 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote: > >> On 4 May 2018, at 12:57, Lawrence Crowell > > wrote: >> >> On Thursday, May 3, 2018 at 8:26:18 AM

Re: Entanglement of macro objects

On Tuesday, May 8, 2018 at 2:51:14 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > On 4 May 2018, at 12:57, Lawrence Crowell > wrote: > > On Thursday, May 3, 2018 at 8:26:18 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> >> >> On 1 May 2018, at 13:02, Lawrence Crowell

Re: Entanglement of macro objects

> On 8 May 2018, at 19:35, Brent Meeker wrote: > > > > On 5/8/2018 12:51 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> >>> On 4 May 2018, at 12:57, Lawrence Crowell >> > wrote: >> ... >>> It may not

Re: Entanglement of macro objects

On 5/8/2018 12:51 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 4 May 2018, at 12:57, Lawrence Crowell > wrote: ... It may not fundamentally exist, and if it does there are then deep questions on how quantum mechanics builds up this

Re: Entanglement of macro objects

> On 4 May 2018, at 12:57, Lawrence Crowell > wrote: > > On Thursday, May 3, 2018 at 8:26:18 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote: > >> On 1 May 2018, at 13:02, Lawrence Crowell > > wrote: >> >> On Tuesday, May 1, 2018 at 3:53:19 AM

Re: Entanglement of macro objects

On Thursday, May 3, 2018 at 8:26:18 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > On 1 May 2018, at 13:02, Lawrence Crowell > wrote: > > On Tuesday, May 1, 2018 at 3:53:19 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> >> >> >> It assumes? Or does it entail the appearance of the

Re: Entanglement of macro objects

> On 1 May 2018, at 13:02, Lawrence Crowell > wrote: > > On Tuesday, May 1, 2018 at 3:53:19 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > It assumes? Or does it entail the appearance of the classical-like structure? > What you say is very interesting, but I have

Re: Entanglement of macro objects

On Tuesday, May 1, 2018 at 3:53:19 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > > It assumes? Or does it entail the appearance of the classical-like > structure? What you say is very interesting, but I have not yet much > understanding of QM+gravity. My own non expert and non rigorous (old) > attempt

Re: Entanglement of macro objects

> On 28 Apr 2018, at 23:23, Lawrence Crowell > wrote: > > On Friday, April 27, 2018 at 11:40:22 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > On 26 Apr 2018, at 13:42, Bruce Kellett > > wrote: > > > > A news story from the Australian ABC

Re: Entanglement of macro objects

On Friday, April 27, 2018 at 11:40:22 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > > On 26 Apr 2018, at 13:42, Bruce Kellett > wrote: > > > > A news story from the Australian ABC shows that it is not just photons > or silver atoms that can become entangled. This is

Re: Entanglement of macro objects

You can look at the paper here

Re: Entanglement of macro objects

> On 26 Apr 2018, at 13:42, Bruce Kellett wrote: > > A news story from the Australian ABC shows that it is not just photons or > silver atoms that can become entangled. This is interesting stuff.. > > >

Re: Entanglement of macro objects

NEAT!   Maintaining entanglement for that long should allow testing whether the entanglement persists over different gravitational potentials. Brent On 4/26/2018 4:42 AM, Bruce Kellett wrote: A news story from the Australian ABC shows that it is not just photons or silver atoms that can

Entanglement of macro objects

A news story from the Australian ABC shows that it is not just photons or silver atoms that can become entangled. This is interesting stuff.. http://www.abc.net.au/news/science/2018-04-26/quantum-physics-entanglement-shown-massive-objects-first-time/9687076 Bruce -- You received this