From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Craig Weinberg
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2013 8:40 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Neural activity in the brain is harder to disrupt when we are
aware of it
On Monday,
On Thursday, November 7, 2013 10:22:48 PM UTC-5, cdemorsella wrote:
*From:* everyth...@googlegroups.com javascript: [mailto:
everyth...@googlegroups.com javascript:] *On Behalf Of *Craig Weinberg
*Sent:* Monday, October 28, 2013 8:40 PM
*To:* everyth...@googlegroups.com javascript:
On 31 Oct 2013, at 19:29, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Thursday, October 31, 2013 12:06:52 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 30 Oct 2013, at 18:01, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Wednesday, October 30, 2013 4:52:49 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 29 Oct 2013, at 19:15, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On 30 Oct 2013, at 02:29, LizR wrote:
On 30 October 2013 14:26, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tuesday, October 29, 2013 8:40:52 PM UTC-4, Liz R wrote:
On 30 October 2013 13:24, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, October 29, 2013 6:52:12 PM UTC-4, Liz R
On 30 Oct 2013, at 03:17, John Mikes wrote:
Bruno, Craig and Learned discussion partners:
it is hard even to read-in into the endless back-and-forth you
exude. At least for me - pretending that I still retain may
subjectivity (don't misunderstand: I deny anything 'objective' if
not
On Thursday, October 31, 2013 12:06:52 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 30 Oct 2013, at 18:01, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Wednesday, October 30, 2013 4:52:49 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 29 Oct 2013, at 19:15, Craig Weinberg wrote:
That assumes that being alive implies
On 29 Oct 2013, at 19:15, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Tuesday, October 29, 2013 1:01:25 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 29 Oct 2013, at 16:17, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Tuesday, October 29, 2013 10:56:44 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 29 Oct 2013, at 14:23, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Wednesday, October 30, 2013 4:52:49 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 29 Oct 2013, at 19:15, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Tuesday, October 29, 2013 1:01:25 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 29 Oct 2013, at 16:17, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Tuesday, October 29, 2013 10:56:44 AM
On 28 Oct 2013, at 19:47, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Monday, October 28, 2013 1:38:58 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 28 Oct 2013, at 15:12, John Mikes wrote:
What do you call ANY PHYSICS? is there a God given marvel (like
any other religious miracle to believe in) callable PHYSICS?
I
On Tuesday, October 29, 2013 3:05:52 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 28 Oct 2013, at 19:47, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Monday, October 28, 2013 1:38:58 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 28 Oct 2013, at 15:12, John Mikes wrote:
What do you call ANY PHYSICS? is there a God given marvel
On Tuesday, October 29, 2013 10:56:44 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 29 Oct 2013, at 14:23, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Tuesday, October 29, 2013 3:05:52 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 28 Oct 2013, at 19:47, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Monday, October 28, 2013
On 29 Oct 2013, at 16:17, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Tuesday, October 29, 2013 10:56:44 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 29 Oct 2013, at 14:23, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Tuesday, October 29, 2013 3:05:52 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 28 Oct 2013, at 19:47, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Tuesday, October 29, 2013 1:01:25 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 29 Oct 2013, at 16:17, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Tuesday, October 29, 2013 10:56:44 AM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 29 Oct 2013, at 14:23, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Tuesday, October 29, 2013
On 30 October 2013 07:15, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
Matter is concrete sense that extends to the inertial frame of the body.
Get rid of your body, and your dream is matter.
Goo goo goo joob!
Sorry, but that does sound like a surreal 60s lyric, though it could maybe
do with
On 30 October 2013 13:24, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, October 29, 2013 6:52:12 PM UTC-4, Liz R wrote:
On 30 October 2013 07:15, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com wrote:
Matter is concrete sense that extends to the inertial frame of the body.
Get rid of your
On 30 October 2013 00:37, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
Physics is what happens in the natural world due to natural processes.
That sentence should win some kind of prize for containing the most
logical
fallacies.
I suppose you could say causes outside of the physical
On Tuesday, October 29, 2013 8:40:52 PM UTC-4, Liz R wrote:
On 30 October 2013 13:24, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com javascript:
wrote:
On Tuesday, October 29, 2013 6:52:12 PM UTC-4, Liz R wrote:
On 30 October 2013 07:15, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com wrote:
Matter is concrete
On 30 October 2013 14:26, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, October 29, 2013 8:40:52 PM UTC-4, Liz R wrote:
On 30 October 2013 13:24, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, October 29, 2013 6:52:12 PM UTC-4, Liz R wrote:
On 30 October 2013 07:15, Craig
On Tuesday, October 29, 2013 9:08:53 PM UTC-4, stathisp wrote:
On 30 October 2013 00:37, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com javascript:
wrote:
Physics is what happens in the natural world due to natural
processes.
That sentence should win some kind of prize for containing
On Tuesday, October 29, 2013 9:29:21 PM UTC-4, Liz R wrote:
On 30 October 2013 14:26, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com javascript:
wrote:
On Tuesday, October 29, 2013 8:40:52 PM UTC-4, Liz R wrote:
On 30 October 2013 13:24, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, October
On 10/29/2013 5:40 PM, LizR wrote:
On 30 October 2013 13:24, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com
mailto:whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, October 29, 2013 6:52:12 PM UTC-4, Liz R wrote:
On 30 October 2013 07:15, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com wrote:
Bruno, Craig and Learned discussion partners:
it is hard even to read-in into the endless back-and-forth you exude. At
least for me - pretending that I still retain may subjectivity (don't
misunderstand: I deny anything 'objective' if not adjusted by our own sub).
We are not capable of even
On Tuesday, October 29, 2013 9:57:29 PM UTC-4, Brent wrote:
On 10/29/2013 5:40 PM, LizR wrote:
On 30 October 2013 13:24, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.comjavascript:
wrote:
On Tuesday, October 29, 2013 6:52:12 PM UTC-4, Liz R wrote:
On 30 October 2013 07:15, Craig Weinberg
On Tuesday, October 29, 2013 10:17:40 PM UTC-4, JohnM wrote:
Bruno, Craig and Learned discussion partners:
it is hard even to read-in into the endless back-and-forth you exude. At
least for me - pretending that I still retain may subjectivity (don't
misunderstand: I deny anything
On Monday, October 28, 2013 12:40:43 AM UTC-4, stathisp wrote:
On 28 October 2013 00:10, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com javascript:
wrote:
On Sunday, October 27, 2013 2:11:35 AM UTC-4, stathisp wrote:
On 24 October 2013 07:46, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com wrote:
What do you call ANY PHYSICS? is there a God given marvel (like any
other religious miracle to believe in) callable PHYSICS? I consider it
the explanation of certain phenomena (mostly with the help of math) at the
level of knowledge AT such time of explanation. It was different in 2500
BC, in 1000
On 28 Oct 2013, at 15:12, John Mikes wrote:
What do you call ANY PHYSICS? is there a God given marvel (like
any other religious miracle to believe in) callable PHYSICS?
I think Stathis was referring to any third person describable lawful
laws, not relying to actual infinities or magic.
On Monday, October 28, 2013 1:38:58 PM UTC-4, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 28 Oct 2013, at 15:12, John Mikes wrote:
What do you call ANY PHYSICS? is there a God given marvel (like any
other religious miracle to believe in) callable PHYSICS?
I think Stathis was referring to any third person
On 29 October 2013 01:12, John Mikes jami...@gmail.com wrote:
What do you call ANY PHYSICS? is there a God given marvel (like any
other religious miracle to believe in) callable PHYSICS? I consider it the
explanation of certain phenomena (mostly with the help of math) at the level
of knowledge
On Monday, October 28, 2013 8:18:04 PM UTC-4, stathisp wrote:
On 29 October 2013 01:12, John Mikes jam...@gmail.com javascript:
wrote:
What do you call ANY PHYSICS? is there a God given marvel (like any
other religious miracle to believe in) callable PHYSICS? I consider it
the
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Craig Weinberg
Sent: Sunday, October 27, 2013 4:23 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Neural activity in the brain is harder to disrupt when we are
aware of it
On Sunday,
On Monday, October 28, 2013 10:10:45 PM UTC-4, cdemorsella wrote:
*From:* everyth...@googlegroups.com javascript: [mailto:
everyth...@googlegroups.com javascript:] *On Behalf Of *Craig Weinberg
*Sent:* Sunday, October 27, 2013 4:23 PM
*To:* everyth...@googlegroups.com javascript:
On 29 October 2013 12:54, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, October 28, 2013 8:18:04 PM UTC-4, stathisp wrote:
On 29 October 2013 01:12, John Mikes jam...@gmail.com wrote:
What do you call ANY PHYSICS? is there a God given marvel (like any
other religious miracle to
On 24 October 2013 07:46, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
http://medicalxpress.com/news/2013-10-neural-brain-harder-disrupt-aware.html
We consciously perceive just a small part of the information processed in
the brain – but which information in the brain remains unconscious and
On Sunday, October 27, 2013 2:11:35 AM UTC-4, stathisp wrote:
On 24 October 2013 07:46, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com javascript:
wrote:
http://medicalxpress.com/news/2013-10-neural-brain-harder-disrupt-aware.html
We consciously perceive just a small part of the information
Allegedly Stathis wrote:
*If consciousness supervenes on neurochemistry then the brain will be
different if the conscious state is different. Demonstrating that there is
a change in consciousness without a change in the brain, or a change in the
brain not explained by the physics, would be
Very interesting – and illustrative of how our perception is an artifact of
our mind/brain. It reminds me of an earlier study in which test subjects
were told they were being scored on their ability to perform some complex
two levels of order visual task – say pressing a button whenever a diagonal
On Sunday, October 27, 2013 7:12:01 PM UTC-4, cdemorsella wrote:
Very interesting – and illustrative of how our perception is an artifact
of our mind/brain. It reminds me of an earlier study in which test subjects
were told they were being scored on their ability to perform some complex
On 28 October 2013 00:10, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sunday, October 27, 2013 2:11:35 AM UTC-4, stathisp wrote:
On 24 October 2013 07:46, Craig Weinberg whats...@gmail.com wrote:
http://medicalxpress.com/news/**2013-10-neural-brain-harder-**
On 28 October 2013 07:33, John Mikes jami...@gmail.com wrote:
Allegedly Stathis wrote:
*If consciousness supervenes on neurochemistry then the brain will be
different if the conscious state is different. Demonstrating that there is
a change in consciousness without a change in the brain, or a
http://medicalxpress.com/news/2013-10-neural-brain-harder-disrupt-aware.html
We consciously perceive just a small part of the information processed in
the brain – but which information in the brain remains unconscious and
which reaches our consciousness remains a mystery. However,
41 matches
Mail list logo
