https://24.media.tumblr.com/6b06d8de192011e7a0e1179d34958785/tumblr_myu2nxlpcz1qeenqko1_500.jpg
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
Looks like a heirarchical Many World h-MW model to me.
I conjecture that Wheeler's ItBit empirical quantum model
is consistent with the h-MW model via ER=EPR tunneling.
Richard
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 12:53 PM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.comwrote:
It's not many worlds, it's a Uni_ that is _versing itself.
On Friday, January 3, 2014 2:06:26 PM UTC-5, yanniru wrote:
Looks like a heirarchical Many World h-MW model to me.
I conjecture that Wheeler's ItBit empirical quantum model
is consistent with the h-MW model via ER=EPR tunneling.
It's not many worlds, it's a Uni_ that is _versing itself.
UNIty in diVERSity-scerir
BTW, did somebody read this paper? It seems
interesting.http://arxiv.org/abs/.3328
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 2:50 PM, scerir sce...@libero.it wrote:
It's not many worlds, it's a Uni_ that is _versing itself.
UNIty in diVERSity
-scerir
BTW, did somebody read this paper? It seems interesting.
http://arxiv.org/abs/.3328
Pusey, Barrett and Rudolf PBR pose the hypothetical
On 4 January 2014 09:01, Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 2:50 PM, scerir sce...@libero.it wrote:
It's not many worlds, it's a Uni_ that is _versing itself.
UNIty in diVERSity
-scerir
BTW, did somebody read this paper? It seems interesting.
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 3:27 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4 January 2014 09:01, Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 2:50 PM, scerir sce...@libero.it wrote:
It's not many worlds, it's a Uni_ that is _versing itself.
UNIty in diVERSity
-scerir
BTW, did
Hmm. Intriguing. The thing is, everyone tells me an interpretation can't
affect QM itself
.oh, I'm going to have to read the darn paper, aren't I?! (Whether it
will make a scintilla of sense to my brain (at least in some branches of
the multiverse) is another question, of course...)
Well the abstract's nice and clear, at least - they attempt to show that
quantum states are not merely information structures relating to some
(unknown) underlynig reality. Presumably that indicates that they *are* the
reality.I will read on.
On 4 January 2014 11:22, LizR lizj...@gmail.com
9 matches
Mail list logo