On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 1:56 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
See the actual paper:
http://arxiv.org/pdf/1304.4595v1.pdf
That's not the same paper and as far as I can tell Catherine McGeoch had
nothing to do with it. And the paper you refer to is about a 108 qbit
computer but these
A quantum computer was found to be 3600 times as fast as a high end PC for
a certain class on problems. The following article was just published today
in New Scientist magazine and it could be huge:
==
For the first time, a commercially available quantum computer has been
pitted against
It's very doubtful that the D-wave computer is a quantum device at all and has anything
to do with qubits. It only solves one particular NP-hard problem (minimizing the energy
of ~100 Ising spins with pairwise interaction) and the solutions are approximate. See
Scott Aronson's blog:
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 2:45 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
It's very doubtful that the D-wave computer is a quantum device at all
and has anything to do with qubits.
That old view is changing, acording to the most recent information it's
very likely that the D-wave computer is a
4 matches
Mail list logo
