? This is what I suspect he is going
for. To be the Dawkins of physics.
-Original Message-
From: freqflyer07281972 thismind...@gmail.com
To: everything-list everyth...@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tue, Dec 3, 2013 9:17 pm
Subject: Question for Bruno Regarding the question of whether
On 5 December 2013 21:53, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com wrote:
I´m very interested in what you question. One of the wonders of life is
how a living being select relevant information from the environment for
their needs. I think that the aestetic sense is a heavy part of the
activity
As far as I remember, the entropy of the black hole is measured in absolute
terms. that is, taking the information from the most fundamental level, at
the Planck scale. But the entropy of a jar is relative to the jar broken
state, not absolute.
The example of a gas is more clear than the one of
I think with black holes there's a physically natural coarse-graining
defined by the no-hair theorem which says that in classical general
relativity, the only distinguishing characteristics of black holes are
mass, charge and angular momentum, they bear no other traces of the
particular
On 12/5/2013 2:35 AM, LizR wrote:
On 5 December 2013 21:53, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com
mailto:agocor...@gmail.com wrote:
I´m very interested in what you question. One of the wonders of life is how
a living
being select relevant information from the environment for their
On 6 December 2013 08:08, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
The hypothesis is that BHs have entropy the same way as everything else,
except that the microscopic degrees of freedom are in spacetime - which
isn't understood.
So are you saying that black holes have emergent entropy, and that
On 12/5/2013 5:18 PM, LizR wrote:
On 6 December 2013 08:08, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net mailto:meeke...@verizon.net
wrote:
The hypothesis is that BHs have entropy the same way as everything else,
except that
the microscopic degrees of freedom are in spacetime - which isn't
On 6 December 2013 14:35, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
Yeah, that's Susskinds firewall idea. Just above the event horizon,
within a few Planck lengths, the strings corresponding to stuff that fell
in are spread over the surface and their degrees of freedom account for the
entropy.
On 04 Dec 2013, at 03:17, freqflyer07281972 wrote:
Hey everyone,
Here is a question for Bruno (and anyone else who wants to chime in)
--
I came across this post over at Sean Carroll's Preposterous Universe
blog, wherein he seems to be claiming that the
relationship between information,
Yes there is no loss of information* at the lowest level,* that is at the
quantum level . But at the lowest level, there is NO notion of HEAT. only
speeds and momentums of elementary particles. HEAT and temperature and
entropy are statistical parameters, words used in the macroscopical laws to
Regarding the question of whether information is
physical.
Hey everyone,
Here is a question for Bruno (and anyone else who wants to chime in) --
I came across this post over at Sean Carroll's Preposterous Universe blog,
wherein he seems to be claiming that the
relationship between information
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 12:03 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
But if the processes are reversible (and they can be) then there is no
entropy increase and no heat.
But if it's reversible then there is no irreversible change in information
either (such as what you'd get if you erased
?
-Original Message-
From: Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com
To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wed, Dec 4, 2013 6:38 am
Subject: Re: Question for Bruno Regarding the question of whether information
is physical.
Yes there is no loss of information at the lowest
.
-Original Message-
From: freqflyer07281972 thismind...@gmail.com javascript:
To: everything-list everyth...@googlegroups.com javascript:
Sent: Tue, Dec 3, 2013 9:17 pm
Subject: Question for Bruno Regarding the question of whether information
is physical.
Hey everyone,
Here is a question
Message-
From: Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.com
To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wed, Dec 4, 2013 6:38 am
Subject: Re: Question for Bruno Regarding the question of whether
information is physical.
Yes there is no loss of information* at the lowest level
A good exposition. It doesn't address the questions of the alignment of thermodynamic,
radiation, and spacetime expansion though. This paper may be of interest:
Arrows of Time in the Bouncing Universes of the No-boundary Quantum State
James Hartle
...@gmail.com
To: everything-list everyth...@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tue, Dec 3, 2013 9:17 pm
Subject: Question for Bruno Regarding the question of whether information
is physical.
Hey everyone,
Here is a question for Bruno (and anyone else who wants to chime in) --
I came across
-
From: freqflyer07281972 thismind...@gmail.com
To: everything-list everyth...@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tue, Dec 3, 2013 9:17 pm
Subject: Question for Bruno Regarding the question of whether
information is physical.
Hey everyone,
Here is a question for Bruno (and anyone else who wants
Hey everyone,
Here is a question for Bruno (and anyone else who wants to chime in) --
I came across this
posthttp://www.preposterousuniverse.com/blog/2013/11/28/thanksgiving-8/over
at Sean Carroll's Preposterous Universe blog, wherein he seems to be
claiming that the
relationship between
On 12/3/2013 6:17 PM, freqflyer07281972 wrote:
Hey everyone,
Here is a question for Bruno (and anyone else who wants to chime in) --
I came across this post
http://www.preposterousuniverse.com/blog/2013/11/28/thanksgiving-8/ over at Sean
Carroll's Preposterous Universe blog, wherein he seems
20 matches
Mail list logo
