On 26 November 2013 17:47, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
Where is the glamorization of genocide?? The U.S. fought WW2 to defeat
practitioners of genocide, when it could have just defended its borders and
let the Nazis have Europe and Japan take China. And now you accuse us of
On 26 November 2013 19:41, Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 10:29 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 November 2013 15:17, Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com wrote:
Most people wouldn't feel deprived if they weren't allowed to play
hockey, or go scuba
On 11/26/2013 12:24 AM, LizR wrote:
On 26 November 2013 17:47, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net mailto:meeke...@verizon.net
wrote:
Where is the glamorization of genocide?? The U.S. fought WW2 to defeat
practitioners of genocide, when it could have just defended its borders and
let
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 3:36 AM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 November 2013 19:41, Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 10:29 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 November 2013 15:17, Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com wrote:
Most people wouldn't feel
On 26 November 2013 21:24, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 November 2013 17:47, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
Where is the glamorization of genocide?? The U.S. fought WW2 to defeat
practitioners of genocide, when it could have just defended its borders and
let the Nazis have
On 25 Nov 2013, at 02:31, LizR wrote:
On 25 November 2013 14:23, Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com wrote:
Stars are essentially fusion bombs and stars can explode.
I like to think of them as fusion reactors. I believe only a few of
them are capable of exploding.
It's just going in the
at 12:57 AM, Chris de Morsella cdemorse...@yahoo.com
wrote:
*From:* everything-list@googlegroups.com [mailto:
everything-list@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Jason Resch
*Sent:* Sunday, November 24, 2013 9:33 PM
*To:* Everything List
*Subject:* Re: Nuclear power
On Sun, Nov 24
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 5:40 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
Actually it doesn't seem hard to make an atomic bomb if you have the
materials.
Yes, if you had some Plutonium or U235 and knew a little about chemical
explosives and how to cast metals you could make a A-bomb. Going from there
to
On 26 November 2013 10:02, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
I would also have been surprised to know that the second half of the 20'th
century was far less bloody than the firs halft.
There is a historical trend towards less violence, I believe. I put it
down to improved technology
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 7:48 PM, Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com wrote:
To make a fusion bomb, you need a fission bomb; and to make a fission
bomb you need a chemical bomb.It may not stop in the other direction. For
example to make a supernova you need fusion.
And to make a fission bomb
I'm still not sure what doesn't stop in one direction.
On 26 November 2013 10:12, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 7:48 PM, Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.comwrote:
To make a fusion bomb, you need a fission bomb; and to make a fission
bomb you need a chemical
:
*From:* everything-list@googlegroups.com [mailto:
everything-list@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Jason Resch
*Sent:* Sunday, November 24, 2013 9:33 PM
*To:* Everything List
*Subject:* Re: Nuclear power
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com
wrote
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 12:33 AM, Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com wrote:
I like the analogy that stars are essentially just giant compost heaps.
The levels of energy production in the core of the sun is quite low on a
per-volume basis: a few hundred watts per cubic meter. On the same order
On this black hole idea (wasn't this Andre Linde's idea originally, by the
way?) - I can't work out if they handle rotating BHs - they mention
Schwarzschild who was nonrotating I believe, bu all real black holes are
likely to be rotating, so does their result still hold up? (One would think
that
On 26 November 2013 10:49, John Mikes jami...@gmail.com wrote:
As part of that endless back-and-forth into Hinduistic Blackholes and
Bohr's GR (!!) Bruno wrote:
*We have no perfect democracy, but an imperfect democracy is still
better than a tyranny. Then we have been blind and tolerate
On 11/25/2013 12:56 PM, LizR wrote:
I heard that hydrogen nuclei in the sun fuse after on average 5 billion years of
wandering around bumping into each other (I guess that's kind of obvious - the Sun is
due to live for about 10 billion years, so it must use its fuel at a comparable rate).
So
On 26 November 2013 14:19, Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com wrote:
It's not the lobby that is powerful or wealthy, (the NRA has only 4
million members), it's that there are a large number of gun owners in
america and many of them are willing to vote to maintain their right to
continue to own
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 8:37 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 November 2013 14:19, Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com wrote:
It's not the lobby that is powerful or wealthy, (the NRA has only 4
million members), it's that there are a large number of gun owners in
america and many of
On 26 November 2013 15:17, Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com wrote:
Most people wouldn't feel deprived if they weren't allowed to play hockey,
or go scuba diving, or take LSD, but if you are one of those people who
likes playing hockey, or going scuba diving, or take LSD, you certainly
would
On 11/25/2013 5:37 PM, LizR wrote:
On 26 November 2013 14:19, Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com
mailto:jasonre...@gmail.com wrote:
It's not the lobby that is powerful or wealthy, (the NRA has only 4 million
members), it's that there are a large number of gun owners in america and
many
On 26 November 2013 16:37, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
1) I don't think you've surveyed the world's population.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Number_of_guns_per_capita_by_country#List_of_countries_by_number_of_guns
2) What difference does it make what people in some other country
On 11/25/2013 7:29 PM, LizR wrote:
On 26 November 2013 15:17, Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com
mailto:jasonre...@gmail.com wrote:
Most people wouldn't feel deprived if they weren't allowed to play hockey,
or go
scuba diving, or take LSD, but if you are one of those people who likes
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 10:29 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 26 November 2013 15:17, Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com wrote:
Most people wouldn't feel deprived if they weren't allowed to play
hockey, or go scuba diving, or take LSD, but if you are one of those people
who likes playing
] On Behalf Of Bruno Marchal
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 9:17 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Nuclear power
On 20 Nov 2013, at 17:33, Chris de Morsella wrote:
The more urgent sacrifice we have to do is to make cannabis
legal, stop prohibition and the lies which
On 24 November 2013 21:36, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
And - PLEASE - do not forget the *G U N S !* (Not that only guns could
kill, but they are the easiest to use in killing other human beings. And it
brings huge advantage to entrepreneurs and State Governments).
We should not
That reminds me of turtles all the way down.
To make a fusion bomb, you need a fission bomb;
and to make a fission bomb you need a chemical bomb.
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 5:40 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24 November 2013 21:36, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
And - PLEASE -
And to make a chemical bomb explode you need a detonator, I assume, and to
make that you need a source of electricity, I imagine, which is also down
to chemical energy of some sort. However I imagine the buck stops here, or
hereabouts.
On 25 November 2013 13:12, Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com
It may not stop in the other direction.
For example to make a supernova you need fusion.
Perhaps it stops at the Big Bang, but it ain't necessarily so.
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 7:15 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
And to make a chemical bomb explode you need a detonator, I assume, and to
I don't quite see what you're getting at here.
On 25 November 2013 13:48, Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com wrote:
It may not stop in the other direction.
For example to make a supernova you need fusion.
Perhaps it stops at the Big Bang, but it ain't necessarily so.
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013
Stars are essentially fusion bombs and stars can explode.
It's just going in the direction of higher energy bombs.
Not sure what comes after supernovas
unless you are willing to believe following Poplawski theory
that black holes can give birth the baby universes via baby big bangs
On Sun, Nov
On 25 November 2013 14:23, Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com wrote:
Stars are essentially fusion bombs and stars can explode.
I like to think of them as fusion reactors. I believe only a few of them
are capable of exploding.
It's just going in the direction of higher energy bombs.
Not
He just solved equations of the theory of General Relativity with spin
called the Einstein-Cartan-Sciama-Kibble theory of gravity,
[which] takes into account effects from quantum mechanics.
http://phys.org/news/2012-05-black-hole-universe-physicist-solution.html
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 8:31 PM,
This looks like another article on the same theory.
http://phys.org/news189792839.html#nRlv
On 25 November 2013 14:54, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
That's very interesting. I don't understand this, though...
The immensely high gravitational energy in this densely packed state
would
I think you are correct. However, the extra particles produce extra spin
and torsion while the mass stayed constant.
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 8:54 PM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
That's very interesting. I don't understand this, though...
The immensely high gravitational energy in this
Being of the Hindu faith (among others) I am compelled to relate that in
the Bagavatum
Vishnu sits in a Cosmic Egg with universes streaming out of his nose.
Poplawski theory says that the baby universe forms at the sametime as the
black hole.
I will be looking for developments of this theory where
OK. I'm just a bit sceptical of the writers now, because what they said in
the bit I quoted didn't seem correct, so maybe they made other mistakes.
But in any case it's an interesting theory.
On 25 November 2013 15:29, Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com wrote:
I think you are correct. However,
On 25 November 2013 15:46, Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com wrote:
Being of the Hindu faith (among others) I am compelled to relate that in
the Bagavatum
Vishnu sits in a Cosmic Egg with universes streaming out of his nose.
I'm sure they nicked that from Douglas Adams. Beware the great
@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Richard Ruquist
Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2013 5:23 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Nuclear power
Stars are essentially fusion bombs and stars can explode.
It's just going in the direction of higher energy bombs.
Not sure what comes after
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com wrote:
Stars are essentially fusion bombs and stars can explode.
I like the analogy that stars are essentially just giant compost heaps.
The levels of energy production in the core of the sun is quite low on a
per-volume
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jason Resch
Sent: Sunday, November 24, 2013 9:33 PM
To: Everything List
Subject: Re: Nuclear power
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 8:23 PM, Richard Ruquist yann...@gmail.com wrote:
Stars
On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 12:57 AM, Chris de Morsella
cdemorse...@yahoo.comwrote:
*From:* everything-list@googlegroups.com [mailto:
everything-list@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Jason Resch
*Sent:* Sunday, November 24, 2013 9:33 PM
*To:* Everything List
*Subject:* Re: Nuclear power
:* Re: Nuclear power
On 20 Nov 2013, at 17:33, Chris de Morsella wrote:
The more urgent sacrifice we have to do is to make cannabis legal,
stop prohibition and the lies which go with it.
We legalized Cannabis in the state of Washington
Yes, I know, and I congratulate your
On 21 Nov 2013, at 17:47, Chris de Morsella wrote:
You worry me a little bit I was joking with the tanks ...
(Well I was hoping being joking ...).
I do worry that some federal prosecutor (with jurisdiction in
Washington or Colorado) will go on a personal Jihad or that a new
:
everything-list@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Bruno Marchal
*Sent:* Wednesday, November 20, 2013 9:17 AM
*To:* everything-list@googlegroups.com
*Subject:* Re: Nuclear power
On 20 Nov 2013, at 17:33, Chris de Morsella wrote:
The more urgent sacrifice we have to do is to make cannabis
] On Behalf Of Bruno Marchal
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 9:17 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Nuclear power
On 20 Nov 2013, at 17:33, Chris de Morsella wrote:
The more urgent sacrifice we have to do is to make cannabis legal,
stop prohibition and the lies
On 21 Nov 2013, at 03:54, Chris de Morsella wrote:
We legalized Cannabis in the state of Washington
Yes, I know, and I congratulate your for that. You show the path!
Amsterdam Copenhagen (Christiania) showed the way earlier. I hope
it works here (and in Colorado too) so that we can work
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Bruno Marchal
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2013 1:31 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Nuclear power
On 21 Nov 2013, at 03:54, Chris de Morsella wrote:
We legalized
On 20 Nov 2013, at 01:11, LizR wrote:
On 20 November 2013 10:42, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 11/19/2013 10:26 AM, John Clark wrote:
Our grandparents didn't make huge sacrifices to their lifestyle to
solve some vague
I'm not a historian, but are you sure? Not even
My son - now 15 - did a project at school in which he advocated legalising
cannabis. He had a lot of good arguments! (Some supplied by me :)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving
On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 11:12 AM, LizR lizj...@gmail.com wrote:
My son - now 15 - did a project at school in which he advocated legalising
cannabis. He had a lot of good arguments! (Some supplied by me :)
Good! I'm happy to read this.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Bruno Marchal
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 12:59 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Nuclear power
On 20 Nov 2013, at 01:11, LizR wrote:
On 20 November 2013 10:42
On 20 Nov 2013, at 11:12, LizR wrote:
My son - now 15 - did a project at school in which he advocated
legalising cannabis. He had a lot of good arguments! (Some supplied
by me :)
Cool!
But strictly speaking, there is no need of any argument.
It is up to those wanting cannabis illegal to
On 20 Nov 2013, at 17:33, Chris de Morsella wrote:
The more urgent sacrifice we have to do is to make cannabis legal,
stop prohibition and the lies which go with it.
We legalized Cannabis in the state of Washington
Yes, I know, and I congratulate your for that. You show the path!
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 4:42 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
You've got to give it a number and a number we can have confidence in;
pretty high is useless
There are plenty of explicit estimates of the cost of sea level rise.
That depends on how much the sea rises and how fast,
On 21 November 2013 07:56, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
That's spudboy's straw man.
Straw man my ass!
Piñata!
Oops, sorry, that's a straw ass...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Bruno Marchal
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 9:17 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Nuclear power
On 20 Nov 2013, at 17:33, Chris de Morsella wrote:
The more
Excellent. Time to drag society into the 19th century on this front, and
realise that Prohibition. Doesn't. Work.
Regulation and taxes, safety campaigns, health warnings, and so on - those
work. Prohibition doesn't, and should also be seen as a violation of human
rights, because it forces anyone
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LizR
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 7:08 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Nuclear power
Excellent. Time to drag society into the 19th century on this front, and
realise
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 2:25 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
Everybody has an opinion but nobody knows the true cost of CO2
emissions, and nobody will know for decades and perhaps centuries.
That's ignoring the science that says it's going to be pretty high if
we continue to
On 11/19/2013 10:26 AM, John Clark wrote:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 2:25 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
mailto:meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
Everybody has an opinion but nobody knows the true cost of CO2
emissions, and
nobody will know for decades and perhaps centuries.
That's
.
-Original Message-
From: meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tue, Nov 19, 2013 4:43 pm
Subject: Re: Nuclear power
On 11/19/2013 10:26 AM, John Clark wrote:
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 2:25 PM, meekerdb
On 20 November 2013 10:42, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 11/19/2013 10:26 AM, John Clark wrote:
Our grandparents didn't make huge sacrifices to their lifestyle to
solve some vague
I'm not a historian, but are you sure? Not even unintentionally? I'm not
arguing, because I don't
to all this loose talk about a pause.
Chris
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of spudboy...@aol.com
Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 3:34 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Nuclear power
The acidification issue must
It is, unfortunately, just wishful thinking. Some people want to deny
reality. In earlier ages they would be religious, I suppose, and would have
denied that the Earth orbits the Sun. In earlier times, people were burned
at the stake for causing cognitive dissonance; now we may see the world go
up
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 9:13 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
I can think of one thing that could dramatically not just slow but
reverse the growth of photovoltaics, removing the tax incentives and
subsidies. In effect government has been lying to the free market about the
true cost
On 11/18/2013 9:33 AM, John Clark wrote:
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 9:13 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
mailto:meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
I can think of one thing that could dramatically not just slow but
reverse the
growth of photovoltaics, removing the tax incentives and
Message-
From: LizR lizj...@gmail.com
To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sun, Nov 17, 2013 1:17 am
Subject: Re: Nuclear power
On 16 November 2013 19:54, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 11/15/2013 8:36 PM, Chris de Morsella wrote
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 4:12 PM, spudboy...@aol.com wrote:
Doesn't Thorium 232 need plutonium to initiate a fertile reaction into a
fissile one. That is converting Th232 into U233?
Yes, a LFTR needs a sort of spark plug, a strong source of neutrons to get
the cycle going. Only about 1000
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Chris de Morsella cdemorse...@yahoo.comwrote:
Perhaps you should read: The End of Cheap Uranium, by Dr Michael Dittmar,
of the Institute of Particle Physics (at CERN),
Dittmar wrote that in 2011, since then despite inflation the price of
Uranium has gone down
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Chris de Morsella cdemorse...@yahoo.comwrote:
A regular reactor produces lots of neutrons but a LFTR makes less of
them, so it needs all that U233 to keep the chain reaction going, if you
try stealing some the reactor will simply stop operating making the
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of John Clark
Sent: Sunday, November 17, 2013 9:31 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Nuclear power
On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Chris de Morsella cdemorse...@yahoo.com
wrote
On 11/16/2013 1:12 PM, spudboy...@aol.com wrote:
Doesn't Thorium 232 need plutonium to initiate a fertile reaction into a
fissile one.
No. It needs some seed of a neutron emitter to get the breeding cycle started, but U235
will work.
Brent
--
You received this message because you are
On 11/16/2013 10:17 PM, LizR wrote:
On 16 November 2013 19:54, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net mailto:meeke...@verizon.net
wrote:
On 11/15/2013 8:36 PM, Chris de Morsella wrote:
First, I think maybe we disagree as to what constitutes a police state. My
definition of it is one in
On 18 November 2013 03:29, spudboy...@aol.com wrote:
Perhaps I am raising the technology bar, way too high, but I have
suspected, that there is some sort of nuclear phenomena, be it fission or
fusion, that is usable for human civilization-some laboratory phenomena,
that never got looked at,
On 18 November 2013 11:13, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 11/16/2013 10:17 PM, LizR wrote:
On 16 November 2013 19:54, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 11/15/2013 8:36 PM, Chris de Morsella wrote:
First, I think maybe we disagree as to what constitutes a police
state.
On 11/17/2013 9:30 AM, John Clark wrote:
I can think of one thing that could dramatically not just slow but reverse the growth of
photovoltaics, removing the tax incentives and subsidies. In effect government has been
lying to the free market about the true cost to the economy of solar cells.
Cost-ways, I can see this.
-Original Message-
From: meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net
To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Fri, Nov 15, 2013 7:37 pm
Subject: Re: Nuclear power
On 11/15/2013 4:11 PM, spudboy...@aol.com wrote:
What about
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of meekerdb
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2013 10:55 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Nuclear power
On 11/15/2013 8:36 PM, Chris de Morsella wrote:
From: everything-list
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Russell Standish li...@hpcoders.com.auwrote:
For all the arguments pro and con nuclear fission, including an
impassioned speech by a 16 year old last night to a UN Youth Voice
competition, what never seems to be discussed is the elephant in the
room of how
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Chris de Morsella cdemorse...@yahoo.comwrote:
LFTR reactors would produce U233 – which is very nasty stuff.
Yes but nasty can be your friend. Proliferation is a vastly smaller problem
with a LFTR and its U-233 than with a conventional reactor and its
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of John Clark
Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2013 10:44 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Nuclear power
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Russell Standish li...@hpcoders.com.au
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of John Clark
Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2013 10:53 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Nuclear power
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Chris de Morsella cdemorse...@yahoo.com
Russell wrote:
*For all the arguments pro and con nuclear fission, including animpassioned
speech by a 16 year old last night to a UN Youth Voicecompetition, what
never seems to be discussed is the elephant in theroom of how much uranium
resources we have. IIUC, if all fossil fuelpower
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of John Mikes
Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2013 12:24 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Nuclear power
Russell wrote:
For all the arguments pro and con nuclear fission, including
To: everything-list everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Sat, Nov 16, 2013 1:44 pm
Subject: Re: Nuclear power
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Russell Standish li...@hpcoders.com.au wrote:
For all the arguments pro and con nuclear fission, including an
impassioned speech by a 16 year old last
On 16 November 2013 19:54, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 11/15/2013 8:36 PM, Chris de Morsella wrote:
First, I think maybe we disagree as to what constitutes a police state.
My definition of it is one in which the police can investigate and
interrogate anyone at anytime on any
On 17 November 2013 07:30, Chris de Morsella cdemorse...@yahoo.com wrote:
That is not what I intend when I mention police state. Security around a
dangerous facility is desirable. What I am referring to is the wholesale
erosion of civil liberties and the wide scale practice of eavesdropping on
On 17 November 2013 07:44, John Clark johnkcl...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Russell Standish
li...@hpcoders.com.auwrote:
For all the arguments pro and con nuclear fission, including an
impassioned speech by a 16 year old last night to a UN Youth Voice
competition,
I'm glad I brought up the subject of thorium reactors, I have learned a lot
more about them than I knew previously (most of it good).
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from
The resources are always the FIRST thing I think about, which is why I
advocate subcritical reactors (well, it's one reason).
Luckily we have a lot of thorium, or so I'm reliably informed, which is
what subcritical reactors use.
On 16 November 2013 10:19, Russell Standish li...@hpcoders.com.au
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Everything List group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to
On 11/15/2013 4:11 PM, spudboy...@aol.com wrote:
What about thorium schemes Dr. Standish? Also, are things such as hydroelectric
reservoirs built on the ocean, and lifting sea water as pumped storage workable, or is
it an energy sink, where we expend more energy then we produce to accomplish
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LizR
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2013 1:21 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Nuclear power
The resources are always the FIRST thing I think about, which is why I
advocate
-Original Message-
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of meekerdb
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2013 1:37 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Nuclear power
On 11/15/2013 1:19 PM, Russell Standish wrote:
On Fri, Nov
On 11/15/2013 6:48 PM, Chris de Morsella wrote:
LFTR reactors would produce U233 -- which is very nasty stuff.
But they breed only what they consume, none of it is 'waste'.
Still preferable to the fast neutron U-238 breeder types that would create the plutonium
economy, but it is very
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of meekerdb
Sent: Friday, November 15, 2013 7:52 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Nuclear power
On 11/15/2013 6:48 PM, Chris de Morsella wrote:
LFTR reactors would produce U233
On 11/15/2013 8:36 PM, Chris de Morsella wrote:
*From:*everything-list@googlegroups.com [mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] *On
Behalf Of *meekerdb
*Sent:* Friday, November 15, 2013 7:52 PM
*To:* everything-list@googlegroups.com
*Subject:* Re: Nuclear power
On 11/15/2013 6:48 PM, Chris
97 matches
Mail list logo